Corneal confocal microscopy following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking procedures for keratoconus.

PURPOSE To compare early corneal healing following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) protocols. METHODS Twenty-four patients with progressive keratoconus were divided into three groups to receive conventional, transepithelial, or accelerated CXL. In vivo corneal confocal microscopy was performed on each patient preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS Closure of the epithelial wound was complete 3 days following conventional and accelerated CXL. The subbasal nerve plexus was essentially obliterated immediately following conventional and accelerated CXL, and virtually no nerve fibers had regenerated by 6 months. The anterior stroma showed significant changes 1 month following conventional CXL; these changes were similar but more pronounced following accelerated CXL. Observed stromal changes included complete obliteration of keratocytes, increased tissue reflectivity, a honeycomb-like appearance, and circular lacunae. Some recovery of keratocyte density was noted after 6 months. These changes were less pronounced in the mid-stroma, and there were no apparent changes to the posterior stroma or endothelium. The cornea appeared to be unaltered following transepithelial CXL. CONCLUSIONS In vivo corneal confocal microscopy analysis of the postoperative impact of CXL on the cornea revealed clear differences among conventional, accelerated, and transepithelial CXL protocols. Accelerated CXL had a greater impact than conventional CXL on the anterior cornea, whereas transepithelial CXL did not appear to alter corneal morphology.

[1]  C. Mazzotta,et al.  Morphological and functional correlations in riboflavin UV A corneal collagen cross‐linking for keratoconus , 2012, Acta ophthalmologica.

[2]  L. Mastropasqua,et al.  The effect of standard and transepithelial ultraviolet collagen cross-linking on human corneal nerves: an ex vivo study. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  David Touboul,et al.  Corneal collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus: Multicenter results from the French National Reference Center for Keratoconus , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  N. Gokhale Corneal Endothelial Damage After Collagen Cross-Linking Treatment , 2011, Cornea.

[5]  S. Greenstein,et al.  Corneal topography indices after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One‐year results , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  S. Sel,et al.  Interlamellar cohesion after corneal crosslinking using riboflavin and ultraviolet A light , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[7]  A. Leccisotti,et al.  Transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus. , 2010, Journal of refractive surgery.

[8]  J. Croxatto,et al.  Sequential in vivo confocal microscopy study of corneal wound healing after cross-linking in patients with keratoconus. , 2010, Journal of refractive surgery.

[9]  C. Mazzotta,et al.  Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in Italy: the Siena eye cross study. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  N. Sharma,et al.  Pseudomonas keratitis after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: case report and review of literature. , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  M. Tassignon,et al.  Keratitis and corneal scarring after UVA/riboflavin cross-linking for keratoconus. , 2009, Journal of refractive surgery.

[12]  C. McGhee,et al.  In vivo confocal microscopy of human corneal nerves in health, in ocular and systemic disease, and following corneal surgery: a review , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[13]  C. Mazzotta,et al.  Corneal crosslinking: Riboflavin concentration in corneal stroma exposed with and without epithelium , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[14]  R. Vinciguerra,et al.  Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[15]  C. Mazzotta,et al.  Corneal healing after riboflavin ultraviolet-A collagen cross-linking determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vivo: early and late modifications. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  C. Mazzotta,et al.  Stromal haze after combined riboflavin‐UVA corneal collagen cross‐linking in keratoconus: in vivo confocal microscopic evaluation , 2007, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[17]  R. Pini,et al.  Riboflavin and ultraviolet A collagen crosslinking: In vivo thermographic analysis of the corneal surface , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  Cristina Tommasi,et al.  Treatment of Progressive Keratoconus by Riboflavin-UVA-Induced Cross-Linking of Corneal Collagen: Ultrastructural Analysis by Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Humans , 2007, Cornea.

[19]  Teruo Nishida,et al.  Noninvasive corneal stromal collagen imaging using two‐photon‐generated second‐harmonic signals , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[20]  Farhad Hafezi,et al.  Corneal Cross-Linking-Induced Stromal Demarcation Line , 2006, Cornea.

[21]  N. Efron,et al.  Observations of Banding Patterns (Vogt Striae) in Keratoconus: A Confocal Microscopy Study , 2005, Cornea.

[22]  T. Seiler,et al.  Collagen Fiber Diameter in the Rabbit Cornea After Collagen Crosslinking by Riboflavin/UVA , 2004, Cornea.

[23]  T. Seiler,et al.  Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  E. Spoerl,et al.  Induction of cross-links in corneal tissue. , 1998, Experimental eye research.