Inter-rater reliability of manual and automated region-of-interest delineation for PiB PET

A major challenge in positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid imaging studies of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the reliable detection of early amyloid deposition in human brain. Manual region-of-interest (ROI) delineation on structural magnetic resonance (MR) images is generally the reference standard for the extraction of count-rate data from PET images, as compared to automated MR-template(s) methods that utilize spatial normalization and a single set of ROIs. The goal of this work was to assess the inter-rater reliability of manual ROI delineation for PiB PET amyloid retention measures and the impact of CSF dilution correction (CSF) on this reliability for data acquired in elderly control (n=5) and AD (n=5) subjects. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure reliability. As a secondary goal, ICC scores were also computed for PiB outcome measures obtained by an automated MR-template ROI method and one manual rater; to assess the level of reliability that could be achieved using different processing methods. Fourteen ROIs were evaluated that included anterior cingulate (ACG), precuneus (PRC) and cerebellum (CER). The PiB outcome measures were the volume of distribution (V(T)), summed tissue uptake (SUV), and corresponding ratios that were computed using CER as reference (DVR and SUVR). Substantial reliability (ICC≥0.932) was obtained across 3 manual raters for V(T) and SUV measures when CSF correction was applied across all outcomes and regions and was similar in the absence of CSF correction. The secondary analysis revealed substantial reliability in primary cortical areas between the automated and manual SUV [ICC≥0.979 (ACG/PRC)] and SUVR [ICC≥0.977/0.952 (ACG/PRC)] outcomes. The current study indicates the following rank order among the various reliability results in primary cortical areas and cerebellum (high to low): 1) V(T) or SUV manual delineation, with or without CSF correction; 2) DVR or SUVR manual delineation, with or without CSF correction; 3) SUV automated delineation, with CSF correction; and 4) SUVR automated delineation, with or without CSF correction. The high inter-rater reliability of PiB outcome measures in primary cortical areas (ACG/PRC) is important as reliable methodology is needed for the detection of low levels of amyloid deposition on a cross-sectional basis and small changes in amyloid deposition on a longitudinal basis.

[1]  Colin L. Masters,et al.  IMAGING β-AMYLOID BURDEN IN AGING AND DEMENTIA. Authors' reply , 2008 .

[2]  Yvette I. Sheline,et al.  Potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease , 2006 .

[3]  Olaf B. Paulson,et al.  MR-based automatic delineation of volumes of interest in human brain PET images using probability maps , 2005, NeuroImage.

[4]  P. Shrout Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry , 1998, Statistical methods in medical research.

[5]  S Minoshima,et al.  An automated method for rotational correction and centering of three-dimensional functional brain images. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality image registration techniques , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Comparative evaluation of MR-based partial-volume correction schemes for PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Bedda L. Rosario,et al.  Basal Cerebral Metabolism May Modulate the Cognitive Effects of Aβ in Mild Cognitive Impairment: An Example of Brain Reserve , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  S. DeKosky,et al.  Kinetic Modeling of Amyloid Binding in Humans using PET Imaging and Pittsburgh Compound-B , 2005, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[10]  H. Mayberg,et al.  Correction of PET Data for Partial Volume Effects in Human Cerebral Cortex by MR Imaging , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[12]  W. Jagust,et al.  The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative positron emission tomography core , 2010, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[13]  Jeffrey A. James,et al.  Frequent amyloid deposition without significant cognitive impairment among the elderly. , 2008, Archives of neurology.

[14]  Kristen A Lindgren,et al.  Thalamic metabolic rate predicts EEG alpha power in healthy control subjects but not in depressed patients , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[15]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  I. Liberzon,et al.  Serotonin 1A receptor messenger RNA regulation in the hippocampus after acute stress , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[17]  Bedda L. Rosario,et al.  Consideration of Optimal Time Window for Pittsburgh Compound B PET Summed Uptake Measurements , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Simon A. Moss,et al.  b -amyloid imaging and memory in non-demented individuals: evidence for preclinical Alzheimer’s disease , 2007 .

[20]  M. Viitanen,et al.  PET amyloid ligand [11C]PIB uptake is increased in mild cognitive impairment , 2007, Neurology.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  MRI and PET Coregistration—A Cross Validation of Statistical Parametric Mapping and Automated Image Registration , 1997, NeuroImage.

[22]  Carolyn C. Meltzer,et al.  Exaggerated 5-HT1A but Normal 5-HT2A Receptor Activity in Individuals Ill with Anorexia Nervosa , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[23]  Lisheng Cai,et al.  Imaging and In Vivo Quantitation of β-Amyloid: An Exemplary Biomarker for Alzheimer’s Disease? , 2006, Biological Psychiatry.

[24]  Lisa A. Weissfeld,et al.  Assessment of parameter settings for SPM5 spatial normalization of structural MRI data: Application to type 2 diabetes , 2008, NeuroImage.

[25]  Alan A. Wilson,et al.  A rapid one-step radiosynthesis of the β-amyloid imaging radiotracer N-methyl-[11C]2-(4′-methylaminophenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazole ([11C]-6-OH-BTA-1) , 2004 .

[26]  Patrick M. Fisher,et al.  FEATURE ARTICLE Medial Prefrontal Cortex 5-HT2A Density Is Correlated with Amygdala Reactivity, Response Habituation, and Functional Coupling , 2009 .

[27]  Gina N. LaRossa,et al.  [11C]PIB in a nondemented population , 2006, Neurology.

[28]  Carolyn C. Meltzer,et al.  xaggerated 5-HT 1 A but Normal 5-HT 2 A Receptor ctivity in Individuals Ill with Anorexia Nervosa , 2007 .

[29]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[30]  A. Fagan,et al.  APOE predicts amyloid‐beta but not tau Alzheimer pathology in cognitively normal aging , 2010, Annals of neurology.

[31]  M. Weiner,et al.  Relationships between biomarkers in aging and dementia , 2009, Neurology.

[32]  David J. Schlyer,et al.  Graphical Analysis of Reversible Radioligand Binding from Time—Activity Measurements Applied to [N-11C-Methyl]-(−)-Cocaine PET Studies in Human Subjects , 1990, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[33]  S. DeKosky,et al.  Simplified quantification of Pittsburgh Compound B amyloid imaging PET studies: a comparative analysis. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[35]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  W. Klunk,et al.  Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound‐B , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[37]  G. Small,et al.  Reliability of drawing regions of interest for positron emission tomographic data , 1992, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[38]  P A Turski,et al.  Six‐month test–retest reliability of MRI‐defined PET measures of regional cerebral glucose metabolic rate in selected subcortical structures , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[39]  Jeffrey A. James,et al.  Amyloid imaging in mild cognitive impairment subtypes , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[40]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[41]  Makoto Inoue,et al.  Template-Based Method for Multiple Volumes of Interest of Human Brain PET Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[42]  Shitij Kapur,et al.  An automated method for the extraction of regional data from PET images , 2006, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[43]  M N Cantwell,et al.  Does cerebral blood flow decline in healthy aging? A PET study with partial-volume correction. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.