HER-2-positive breast carcinomas as a particular subset with peculiar clinical behaviors.

PURPOSE The association between HER-2-positivity, and prognostic variables and survival have been addressed in many studies with still controversial results because of the small series analyzed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A series of 1928 primary breast carcinomas was analyzed for the prognostic potential of HER-2 overexpression. RESULTS In our series, HER-2-positivity was not associated with nodal status, unless the number of infiltrated nodes was considered, whereas it was strongly associated with large tumors (P < 10(-4)), grade III tumors (P < 10(-4)), lymphoid infiltration (P < 10(-4)), and absence of hormone receptor expression (P < 10(-4)). HER-2 overexpression was a strong prognostic indicator in N+ patients (P < 10(-7)), whereas its prognostic impact was weak and not statistically significant in the N- patients. Analysis of the hazard ratio of relapse in relation to time from surgery indicates that the poor prognosis associated with HER-2 positivity in N+ patients was found to be attributable to a peak of relapses in the first 3-4 years from surgery. Multivariate analysis of different prognostic factors in HER-2+ and HER-2- subsets indicated that grade is the most important factor followed by nodal status, lymphoid infiltration, and tumor size in HER-2-negative breast carcinomas, whereas nodal status was the most important prognostic factor, with tumor size showing only borderline significance, in the HER-2-positive group. CONCLUSIONS Together, the results indicate that HER-2-positive breast carcinomas represent a particular subset of tumors with peculiar clinical and pathological behaviors. Thus, conclusions drawn from clinical trials, which serve as the basis for clinical management of breast carcinomas, might not always be valid for this low-frequency subset.

[1]  O. Nanni,et al.  Prognostic significance of biologic markers in node-negative breast cancer patients: a prospective study , 2000, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[2]  G. Corrao Pathobiologic identification of two distinct breast carcinoma subsets with diverging clinical behaviors. , 2001, Breast cancer research and treatment.

[3]  P. Stanton,et al.  The value of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) as a prognostic marker. , 2001, European journal of cancer.

[4]  F. Spyratos,et al.  Relationship between c-erbB-2 and other tumor characteristics in breast cancer prognosis. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[5]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[6]  E Biganzoli,et al.  Time-dependent relevance of steroid receptors in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[8]  J. Fletcher,et al.  HER-2/neu (c-erb-B2) gene and protein in breast cancer. , 1999, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  C. Bartoli,et al.  c-erbB2/neu gene and chromosome 17 analysis in breast cancer by FISH on archival cytological fine-needle aspirates , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  D A Berry,et al.  erbB-2, p53, and efficacy of adjuvant therapy in lymph node-positive breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  J. Ross,et al.  The HER‐2/neu Oncogene in Breast Cancer: Prognostic Factor, Predictive Factor, and Target for Therapy , 1998, Stem cells.

[12]  D. Slamon,et al.  HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  M. Gerretsen,et al.  A phase III randomised trial of cisplatinum, methotrextate, cisplatinum + methotrexate and cisplatinum + 5-FU in end stage squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Liverpool Head and Neck Oncology Group. , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  R. Blamey,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long‐term follow‐up , 1992, Histopathology.

[15]  S. Ménard,et al.  Prognostic significance of her‐2/neu expression in breast cancer and its relationship to other prognostic factors , 1991, International journal of cancer.

[16]  A. Testori,et al.  Comparison of long‐term survival of 1986 consecutive patients with breast cancer treated at the national cancer institute of milano, italy (1971 to 1972 and 1977 to 1978) , 1991, Cancer.

[17]  M. Fernö,et al.  ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer with a high rate of proliferation. , 1991, Oncogene.

[18]  W Godolphin,et al.  Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. , 1989, Science.

[19]  M. Berger,et al.  Expression of the c‐erbB‐2 protein in normal and transformed cells , 1987, International journal of cancer.

[20]  M. Pike,et al.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.