Childrearing and fertility.

The authors of this book chapter argue that fertility may increase if there is any relaxation or easing of the tension between work responsibilities and child rearing in industrialized countries. This article identifies a variety of factors that are likely to influence the extent to which mother and worker roles are compatible. The review suggests that improved child care arrangements may mediate between work and fertility but may not always result in increased fertility. Costs of child care average in the US about 10% of gross family income for families with children aged under 5 years and 20% for poor single parent families. The emotional costs of relying on an alternative caretaker may be high. Women in the US may be sensitive to the negative attitudes toward working mothers. Comprehensive maternal leave policies and cash benefits do not directly encourage fertility. Both men and women work for a variety of reasons. The article presents empirical evidence largely from the US although there are examples from Germany and France. There are methodological and data availability gaps in childbearing motivation that account for the limited analysis on US fertility-related effects of changes in the social organization of work and child care. It is assumed that there is a motivation to have children and that it varies with changes in the social organization of work and child care. Three types of work-child rearing contexts are distinguished: simultaneous work and child rearing tasks; incompatible work roles and child rearing; and simultaneous market work and other child care arrangements. The coordination of these roles and the impact on fertility are discussed in terms of job characteristics the sequencing of work and family roles costs access to child care attitudes toward working mothers norms on child care and diffusion.

[1]  R. Rindfuss,et al.  Women work and children: behavioral and attitudinal change in the United States. , 1996 .

[2]  James R. Walker The effect of public policies on recent Swedish fertility behavior , 1995 .

[3]  J. Witte,et al.  Declining Fertility in East Germany After Unification: A Demographic Response to Socioeconomic Change , 1995 .

[4]  R. Rindfuss,et al.  The divorce of marriage and childbearing: changing attitudes and behavior in the United States. , 1993 .

[5]  D. J. Hernandez America's Children: Resources from Family, Government, and the Economy. A Census Monograph Series. , 1993 .

[6]  D. Blau The Economics of Child Care. , 1992 .

[7]  I. Wallerstein,et al.  Creating and Transforming Households: The Constraints of the World-Economy , 1992 .

[8]  S. Hofferth National Child Care Survey, 1990 , 1991 .

[9]  Linda J. Waite,et al.  Women's Employment During Pregnancy and After the First Birth: Occupational Characteristics and Work Commitment , 1991 .

[10]  L. Waite,et al.  What Parents Pay For: Child Care Characteristics, Quality, and Costs , 1991 .

[11]  J. Hoem Social policy and recent fertility change in Sweden. , 1990 .

[12]  W. Lutz,et al.  Measuring fertility responses to policy measures in the German Democratic Republic. , 1990 .

[13]  S. Bianchi America's children: mixed prospects. , 1990, Population bulletin.

[14]  S. Mintz,et al.  Domestic Revolutions: A Social History of American Family Life , 1988 .

[15]  M. Hout,et al.  Gender and work : a comparative analysis of industrial societies , 1986 .

[16]  O. Ekert-Jaffé Effets et limites des aides financières aux familles : une expérience et un modèle , 1986 .

[17]  J. Caldwell Theory of Fertility Decline , 1982 .

[18]  C. Degler At Odds: Women and the Family in America from the Revolution to the Present , 1980 .

[19]  J. Cramer Fertility and female employment: problems of causal direction. , 1980, American sociological review.

[20]  T. Ho Time Costs of Child Rearing in the Rural Philippines , 1979 .

[21]  L. Hoffman,et al.  The Value of Children in the United States: A New Approach to the Study of Fertility. , 1979 .

[22]  C. Westoff Marriage and fertility in the developed countries. , 1978, Scientific American.

[23]  C. John,et al.  A fertility reaction to a historical event: southern white birthrates and the 1954 desegregation ruling. , 1978, Science.

[24]  L. Hoffman,et al.  The value of children to parents in the United States , 1978 .

[25]  R. Rindfuss,et al.  Postwar Fertility Trends and Differentials in the United States , 1978 .

[26]  Linda J. Waite,et al.  Age, Fertility Expectations and Plans for Employment , 1977 .

[27]  J. Sweet Women in the Labor Force , 1975 .

[28]  J. Huber,et al.  Changing women in a changing society , 1974 .

[29]  J. T. Fawcett,et al.  Psychological Perspectives on Population. , 1974 .

[30]  M. C. Sheps,et al.  Public health and population change : current research issues , 1967 .

[31]  J. Blake Demographic science and the redirection of population policy. , 1965, Journal of chronic diseases.

[32]  Philippe Ariès,et al.  Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life (L'Enfant et la vie familiale sous l'ancien regime) , 1964, History of Education Quarterly.

[33]  A. Leibowitz,et al.  The Work-Employment Distinction Among New Mothers , 1994 .

[34]  A. Monnier,et al.  The demographic situation of Europe and the developed countries overseas: an annual report. , 1993, Population. English selection.

[35]  F. Stafford,et al.  Female labor force participation fertility and public policy. , 1991 .

[36]  James R. Walker PUBLIC POLICY AND THE SUPPLY OF CHILD CARE SERVICES , 1990 .

[37]  D. Blanchet Les effets démographiques de différentes mesures de politique familiale : un essai d'évaluation , 1987 .

[38]  R. Rindfuss,et al.  Those ubiquitous fertility trends: United States, 1945-1979. , 1983, Social biology.

[39]  Froma Walsh,et al.  Normal family processes. , 1982 .

[40]  A. Oakley Woman's Work: The Housewife, Past and Present , 1975 .

[41]  Hoffman Lw,et al.  The value of children to parents. , 1973 .