Simultaneous couch and gantry dynamic arc rotation (CG‐Darc) in the treatment of breast cancer with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI): a feasibility study

The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetry of CG‐Darc with three‐dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) and volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) in the treatment of breast cancer with APBI. CG‐Darc plans were generated using two tangential couch arcs combined with a simultaneous noncoplanar gantry arc. The dynamic couch arc was modeled by consecutive IMRT fields at 10° intervals. RapidArc plans used a single partial arc with an avoidance sector, preventing direct beam exit into the thorax. CG‐Darc and RapidArc plans were compared with 3D CRT in 20 patients previously treated with 3D CRT (group A), and in 15 additional patients who failed the dosimetric constraints of the Canadian trial and of NSABP B‐39/RTOG 0413 for APBI (group B). CG‐Darc resulted in superior target coverage compared to 3D CRT and RapidArc (V95%: 98.2% vs. 97.1% and 95.7%). For outer breast lesions, CG‐Darc and RapidArc significantly reduced the ipsilateral breast V50% by 8% in group A and 15% in group B (p<0.05) as compared with 3D CRT. For inner and centrally located lesions, CG‐Darc resulted in significant ipsilateral lung V10% reduction when compared to 3D CRT and RapidArc (10.7% vs. 12.6% and 20.7% for group A, and 15.1% vs. 25.2% and 27.3% for group B). Similar advantage was observed in the dosimetry of contralateral breast where the percent maximum dose for CG‐Darc, 3D CRT, and RapidArc were 3.9%, 6.3%, and 5.8% for group A and 4.3%, 9.2%, and 6.3% for group B, respectively (p<0.05). CG‐Darc achieved superior target coverage while decreasing normal tissue dose even in patients failing APBI dose constraints. Consequently, this technique has the potential of expanding the use of APBI to patients currently ineligible for such treatment. Modification of the RapidArc algorithm will be necessary to link couch and gantry rotation with variable dose rate and, therefore, enable the use of CG‐Darc in clinical practice. PACS number: 80

[1]  K. Hunter,et al.  Prospective trial of accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  I. Paddick,et al.  A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans , 2001 .

[3]  Margie Hunt,et al.  Choreographing couch and collimator in volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  L. Cozzi,et al.  Planning strategies in volumetric modulated arc therapy for breast. , 2011, Medical physics.

[5]  S. Zavgorodni,et al.  The impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans , 2010, Radiation oncology.

[6]  A. Recht,et al.  Lung dose-volume parameters and the risk of pneumonitis for patients treated with accelerated partial-breast irradiation using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Di Yan,et al.  Continuous arc rotation of the couch therapy for the delivery of accelerated partial breast irradiation: a treatment planning analysis. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Do-Hoon Kim,et al.  Three-year outcomes of a Canadian multicenter study of accelerated partial breast irradiation using conformal radiation therapy. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  L. Livi,et al.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation with IMRT: new technical approach and interim analysis of acute toxicity in a phase III randomized clinical trial. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  I. Paddick.  A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans. Technical note. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  W. Curran,et al.  OT2-06-02: A Randomized Phase III Study of Conventional Whole Breast Irradiation (WBI) vs Partial Breast Irradiation (PBI) for Women with Stage 0, 1, or 2 Breast Cancer: NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413. , 2011 .

[12]  L. Price,et al.  Toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Xin Wang.  Impact of volumetric modulated arc therapy technique on treatment with partial breast irradiation , 2011 .

[14]  F. Vicini,et al.  Initial efficacy results of RTOG 0319: three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) confined to the region of the lumpectomy cavity for stage I/ II breast carcinoma. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Impact of volumetric modulated arc therapy technique on treatment with partial breast irradiation. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  R. Jagsi,et al.  Unacceptable cosmesis in a protocol investigating intensity-modulated radiotherapy with active breathing control for accelerated partial-breast irradiation. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Karl Otto,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. , 2007, Medical physics.

[18]  Tae Hyun Kim,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of four different external beam partial breast irradiation techniques: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, helical tomotherapy, and proton beam therapy. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  Kyle E. Rusthoven,et al.  Accelerated partial-breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy results in improved dose distribution when compared with three-dimensional treatment-planning techniques. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.