Renewable hydrogen: carbon formation on Ni and Ru catalysts during ethanol steam-reforming

Biomass is probably the only realistic green and sustainable carbonaceous alternative to fossil fuels. By degradation and fermentation, it can be converted into bioethanol, which is a chemical with a range of possible applications. In this study, the catalytic steam-reforming of ethanol for the production of hydrogen is investigated, along with quantitative and qualitative determinations of carbon formation on the catalysts by TPO and TEM experiments. A Ru/MgAl2O4 catalyst, a Ni/MgAl2O4 catalyst as well as Ag- and K-promoted Ni/MgAl2O4 catalysts were studied. The operating temperature was between 673 and 873 K, and a 25 vol% ethanol–water mixture was employed. Deactivation of the catalysts by carbon formation is the main obstacle for industrial use of this process. Carbon formation was found to be highly affected by the operating temperature and the choice of catalyst. The effect of Ag addition was a rapid deactivation of the catalyst due to an enhanced gum carbon formation on the Ni crystals. Contrary to this, the effect of K addition was a prolonged resistance against carbon formation and therefore against deactivation. The Ru catalyst operates better than all the Ni catalysts, especially at lower temperatures.

[1]  G. Bonura,et al.  H2 production for MC fuel cell by steam reforming of ethanol over MgO supported Pd, Rh, Ni and Co catalysts , 2004 .

[2]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Controlling the catalytic bond-breaking selectivity of Ni surfaces by step blocking , 2005, Nature materials.

[3]  L. Schmidt,et al.  Steam reforming and water–gas shift of ethanol on Rh and Rh–Ce catalysts in a catalytic wall reactor , 2004 .

[4]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Insight into steam reforming of ethanol to produce hydrogen for fuel cells , 2006 .

[5]  Jens R. Rostrup-Nielsen,et al.  CO2-Reforming of Methane over Transition Metals , 1993 .

[6]  Hakan Bayraktar,et al.  Experimental and theoretical investigation of using gasoline–ethanol blends in spark-ignition engines , 2005 .

[7]  Xenophon E. Verykios,et al.  Production of hydrogen for fuel cells by steam reforming of ethanol over supported noble metal catalysts , 2003 .

[8]  X. Verykios,et al.  Renewable Hydrogen from Ethanol by Autothermal Reforming , 2004, Science.

[9]  Agus Haryanto,et al.  Current status of hydrogen production techniques by steam reforming of ethanol : A review , 2005 .

[10]  C. A. Bernardo,et al.  Carbon deposition and methane steam reforming on silica-supported NiCu catalysts , 1985 .

[11]  G. Bonura,et al.  Steam reforming of bio-ethanol on alkali-doped Ni/MgO catalysts: hydrogen production for MC fuel cell , 2004 .

[12]  Clausen,et al.  Design of a surface alloy catalyst for steam reforming , 1998, Science.

[13]  C. Mirodatos,et al.  On-board hydrogen production in a hybrid electric vehicle by bio-ethanol oxidative steam reforming over Ni and noble metal based catalysts , 2003 .

[14]  S. Cavallaro,et al.  Ethanol steam reforming on Rh/Al2O3 catalysts , 2000 .

[15]  Jens R. Rostrup-Nielsen.  Conversion of hydrocarbons and alcohols for fuel cells , 2001 .

[16]  L. F. Brown.  A comparative study of fuels for on-board hydrogen production for fuel-cell-powered automobiles , 2001 .

[17]  A. Züttel,et al.  Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications , 2001, Nature.

[18]  D. Duprez,et al.  Ethanol steam reforming over MgxNi1−xAl2O3 spinel oxide-supported Rh catalysts , 2005 .

[19]  Daniel Duprez,et al.  Bio-ethanol catalytic steam reforming over supported metal catalysts , 2002 .