Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking☆
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Moscovici,et al. Biased information search in group decision making. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[2] P. Goodman. Designing effective work groups , 1999 .
[3] Parks,et al. Discussion and Decision: The Interrelationship between Initial Preference Distribution and Group Discussion Content. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[4] Christine Hoffmann,et al. The process of inductive inference in groups: The use of positive and negative hypothesis and target testing in sequential rule-discovery tasks. , 1998 .
[5] Hart. Preventing Groupthink Revisited: Evaluating and Reforming Groups in Government. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[6] Esser,et al. Alive and Well after 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[7] van de Evert Vliert,et al. Using Conflict in Organizations , 1997 .
[8] Theresa S. Cho,et al. The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves , 1996 .
[9] C. Vlek,et al. Effects on Decision Quality of Supporting Multi-attribute Evaluation in Groups , 1996, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[10] A. Dennis. Information Exchange and Use in Small Group Decision Making , 1996 .
[11] R. Lawson,et al. Groupthink: Deciding with the Leader and The Devil , 1996 .
[12] Edward E. Smith,et al. A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. , 1996 .
[13] Gary Katzenstein,et al. The Debate on Structured Debate: Toward a Unified Theory , 1996 .
[14] Aaron M. Brower,et al. What's Social about Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups , 1996 .
[15] Charles R. Schwenk,et al. Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry Effects on Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1995 .
[16] Joseph S. Valacich,et al. Effects of Devil′s Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry on Individuals versus Groups , 1994 .
[17] Steve Williams,et al. Unanimous versus Majority Influences on Group Polarization in Business Decision Making , 1993 .
[18] Janet A. Sniezek,et al. Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making☆ , 1992 .
[19] Steve Williams,et al. Does training in problem solving improve the quality of group decisions , 1991 .
[20] W Q Judge,et al. Antecedents and Outcomes of Decision Speed in Different Environmental Contexts , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.
[21] Charles R. Schwenk. Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis , 1990 .
[22] Paula L. Rechner,et al. Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making , 1989 .
[23] W. P. Barnett,et al. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .
[24] R. Field. Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management , 1989 .
[25] Rebecca A. Henry,et al. Accuracy and confidence in group judgment , 1989 .
[26] M. Konovsky. The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations , 1988 .
[27] C. Nemeth,et al. Minority Influence, Divergent Thinking and Detection of Correct Solutions , 1987 .
[28] J. Klayman,et al. Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .
[29] J. P. Wanous,et al. Solution Diversity and the Quality of Groups Decisions , 1986 .
[30] D. Schweiger,et al. Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .
[31] Dean Tjosvold,et al. Effect of Concurrence, Controversy, and Consensus on Group Decision Making , 1985 .
[32] N. Pennington,et al. Inside the Jury. , 1985 .
[33] Charles R. Schwenk. DEVIL'S ADVOCACY IN MANAGERIAL DECISION-MAKING , 1984 .
[34] L. James,et al. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .
[35] Dean Tjosvold,et al. Effects of approach to controversy on superiors' incorporation of subordinates' information in decision making. , 1982 .
[36] John Rohrbaugh,et al. Improving the quality of group judgment: Social judgment analysis and the nominal group technique , 1981 .
[37] Jacqueline V. Lerner,et al. Effects of Affirmation and Acceptance on Incorporation of Opposing Information in Problem-Solving , 1981 .
[38] M. Snyder,et al. Testing Hypotheses about Other People , 1981 .
[39] Dean Tjosvold,et al. Effects of controversy within a cooperative or competitive context on organizational decision making. , 1980 .
[40] S. E. White,et al. The effects of group decision-making process and problem-situation complexity on implementation attempts. , 1980, Administrative science quarterly.
[41] A. Vinokur,et al. Depolarization of attitudes in groups. , 1978 .
[42] Theodore T. Herbert,et al. Improving Executive Decisions by Formalizing Dissent: The Corporate Devil's Advocate , 1977 .
[43] C. H. Castore,et al. A Longitudinal Field Investigation of the Impact of Group Composition on Group Performance and Cohesion. , 1976 .
[44] G. Strother. The Moral Codes of Executives: A Watergate-inspired Look at Barnard's Theory of Executive Responsibility , 1976 .
[45] S. Schulz-Hardt,et al. The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the effects of pre-discussion dissent , 2002 .
[46] R. Golembiewski. Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .
[47] S. Schulz-Hardt,et al. Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[48] Joanie B. Connell,et al. Improving Decision Making by Means of Dissent1 , 2001 .
[49] J. Greenberg. Behavior in organizations : understanding and managing the human side of work / Jerlad Greenberg and Robert A. Baron , 2000 .
[50] C. Dreu,et al. Introduction : Using conflict in organizations , 1997 .
[51] Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al. Management of information in small groups. , 1996 .
[52] Charles R. Schwenk,et al. Effects of Consensus and Devill's Advocacy On Strategic Decision‐Making , 1993 .
[53] Susan E. Jackson,et al. Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. , 1991 .
[54] Charles R. Schwenk,et al. Agreement and thinking alike: ingredients for poor decisions , 1990 .
[55] Alice H. Eagly,et al. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .
[56] J. Hackman,et al. The design of work teams , 1987 .
[57] C. Nemeth. Differential contributions of majority and minority influence , 1986 .
[58] D. A. Kenny,et al. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[59] Dieter Frey,et al. Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.
[60] J. W. Graham,et al. Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. , 1986 .
[61] S. Robbins. Essentials of Organizational Behavior , 1984 .
[62] R. Mason,et al. Challenging strategic planning assumptions : theory, cases, and techniques , 1981 .
[63] Jonathan D. Stanley. Dissent in Organizations , 1981 .
[64] I. Janis,et al. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .
[65] Frederic E. Finch,et al. Managerial decision making , 1975 .
[66] I. Steiner. Group process and productivity , 1972 .