Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking☆

[1]  S. Moscovici,et al.  Biased information search in group decision making. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  P. Goodman Designing effective work groups , 1999 .

[3]  Parks,et al.  Discussion and Decision: The Interrelationship between Initial Preference Distribution and Group Discussion Content. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[4]  Christine Hoffmann,et al.  The process of inductive inference in groups: The use of positive and negative hypothesis and target testing in sequential rule-discovery tasks. , 1998 .

[5]  Hart Preventing Groupthink Revisited: Evaluating and Reforming Groups in Government. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[6]  Esser,et al.  Alive and Well after 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[7]  van de Evert Vliert,et al.  Using Conflict in Organizations , 1997 .

[8]  Theresa S. Cho,et al.  The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves , 1996 .

[9]  C. Vlek,et al.  Effects on Decision Quality of Supporting Multi-attribute Evaluation in Groups , 1996, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[10]  A. Dennis Information Exchange and Use in Small Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[11]  R. Lawson,et al.  Groupthink: Deciding with the Leader and The Devil , 1996 .

[12]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. , 1996 .

[13]  Gary Katzenstein,et al.  The Debate on Structured Debate: Toward a Unified Theory , 1996 .

[14]  Aaron M. Brower,et al.  What's Social about Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups , 1996 .

[15]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry Effects on Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1995 .

[16]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Effects of Devil′s Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry on Individuals versus Groups , 1994 .

[17]  Steve Williams,et al.  Unanimous versus Majority Influences on Group Polarization in Business Decision Making , 1993 .

[18]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making☆ , 1992 .

[19]  Steve Williams,et al.  Does training in problem solving improve the quality of group decisions , 1991 .

[20]  W Q Judge,et al.  Antecedents and Outcomes of Decision Speed in Different Environmental Contexts , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[21]  Charles R. Schwenk Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis , 1990 .

[22]  Paula L. Rechner,et al.  Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making , 1989 .

[23]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[24]  R. Field Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management , 1989 .

[25]  Rebecca A. Henry,et al.  Accuracy and confidence in group judgment , 1989 .

[26]  M. Konovsky The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations , 1988 .

[27]  C. Nemeth,et al.  Minority Influence, Divergent Thinking and Detection of Correct Solutions , 1987 .

[28]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[29]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Solution Diversity and the Quality of Groups Decisions , 1986 .

[30]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .

[31]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effect of Concurrence, Controversy, and Consensus on Group Decision Making , 1985 .

[32]  N. Pennington,et al.  Inside the Jury. , 1985 .

[33]  Charles R. Schwenk DEVIL'S ADVOCACY IN MANAGERIAL DECISION-MAKING , 1984 .

[34]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[35]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of approach to controversy on superiors' incorporation of subordinates' information in decision making. , 1982 .

[36]  John Rohrbaugh,et al.  Improving the quality of group judgment: Social judgment analysis and the nominal group technique , 1981 .

[37]  Jacqueline V. Lerner,et al.  Effects of Affirmation and Acceptance on Incorporation of Opposing Information in Problem-Solving , 1981 .

[38]  M. Snyder,et al.  Testing Hypotheses about Other People , 1981 .

[39]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of controversy within a cooperative or competitive context on organizational decision making. , 1980 .

[40]  S. E. White,et al.  The effects of group decision-making process and problem-situation complexity on implementation attempts. , 1980, Administrative science quarterly.

[41]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Depolarization of attitudes in groups. , 1978 .

[42]  Theodore T. Herbert,et al.  Improving Executive Decisions by Formalizing Dissent: The Corporate Devil's Advocate , 1977 .

[43]  C. H. Castore,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of the Impact of Group Composition on Group Performance and Cohesion. , 1976 .

[44]  G. Strother The Moral Codes of Executives: A Watergate-inspired Look at Barnard's Theory of Executive Responsibility , 1976 .

[45]  S. Schulz-Hardt,et al.  The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the effects of pre-discussion dissent , 2002 .

[46]  R. Golembiewski Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[47]  S. Schulz-Hardt,et al.  Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  Joanie B. Connell,et al.  Improving Decision Making by Means of Dissent1 , 2001 .

[49]  J. Greenberg Behavior in organizations : understanding and managing the human side of work / Jerlad Greenberg and Robert A. Baron , 2000 .

[50]  C. Dreu,et al.  Introduction : Using conflict in organizations , 1997 .

[51]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Management of information in small groups. , 1996 .

[52]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Effects of Consensus and Devill's Advocacy On Strategic Decision‐Making , 1993 .

[53]  Susan E. Jackson,et al.  Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. , 1991 .

[54]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Agreement and thinking alike: ingredients for poor decisions , 1990 .

[55]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[56]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[57]  C. Nemeth Differential contributions of majority and minority influence , 1986 .

[58]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[60]  J. W. Graham,et al.  Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. , 1986 .

[61]  S. Robbins Essentials of Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[62]  R. Mason,et al.  Challenging strategic planning assumptions : theory, cases, and techniques , 1981 .

[63]  Jonathan D. Stanley Dissent in Organizations , 1981 .

[64]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[65]  Frederic E. Finch,et al.  Managerial decision making , 1975 .

[66]  I. Steiner Group process and productivity , 1972 .