Bioeffects caused by changes in acoustic cavitation bubble density and cell concentration: a unified explanation based on cell-to-bubble ratio and blast radius.

[1]  A. R. Williams Ultrasound : biological effects and potential hazards , 1983 .

[2]  H. Saunders,et al.  Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications , 1984 .

[3]  S. Zimmer,et al.  Transfection of mammalian cells with plasmid DNA by scrape loading and sonication loading. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  R. Roemer,et al.  Heat transfer in bioengineering and medicine , 1987 .

[5]  J. Ellwart,et al.  Cell membrane damage by ultrasound at different cell concentrations. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  J. Seifert,et al.  The mechanisms of stone disintegration by shock waves. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  R. Apfel,et al.  Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  J. Weaver,et al.  A quantitative study of electroporation showing a plateau in net molecular transport. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[9]  T. Leighton The Acoustic Bubble , 1994 .

[10]  R. M. Thomas,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents nucleate inertial cavitation in vitro. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  S. Kaul,et al.  Hemodynamic characteristics, myocardial kinetics and microvascular rheology of FS-069, a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent capable of producing myocardial opacification from a venous injection. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  T J Flotte,et al.  Physical characteristics and biological effects of laser-induced stress waves. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  M. Miller,et al.  Hemolysis of albunex-supplemented, 40% hematocrit human erythrocytes in vitro by 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound: acoustic pressure and pulse length dependence. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  E. Balcer-Kubiczek,et al.  In vitro mechanisms of chemopotentiation by tone-burst ultrasound. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  D. Miller,et al.  Ultrasonically induced hemolysis at high cell and gas body concentrations in a thin-disc exposure chamber. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  K. Takayama,et al.  Dynamic behavior of bubbles during extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  J F Greenleaf,et al.  Artificial cavitation nuclei significantly enhance acoustically induced cell transfection. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  J. Morris,et al.  Sonoporation of cultured cells in the rotating tube exposure system. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  A. Brayman,et al.  Transient poration and cell surface receptor removal from human lymphocytes in vitro by 1 MHz ultrasound. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast‐agent gas bodies , 1999 .

[23]  L A Crum,et al.  Effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound on whole blood with and without microbubble contrast agent. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[24]  J D Thomas,et al.  Ten-fold augmentation of endothelial uptake of vascular endothelial growth factor with ultrasound after systemic administration. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  Junru Wu,et al.  Experimental study of the effects of Optison concentration on sonoporation in vitro. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  W L Nyborg,et al.  Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part II: general review. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[27]  M. Dake,et al.  High-efficiency endovascular gene delivery via therapeutic ultrasound. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  E. Unger,et al.  Gene Delivery Using Ultrasound Contrast Agents , 2001, Echocardiography.

[29]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. II. Heterogeneous effects on cells. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. I. Quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Sonoluminescence as an indicator of cell membrane disruption by acoustic cavitation. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[32]  Junru Wu,et al.  Theoretical study on shear stress generated by microstreaming surrounding contrast agents attached to living cells. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[33]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Equilibrium loading of cells with macromolecules by ultrasound: effects of molecular size and acoustic energy. , 2002, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[34]  A. D'emanuele,et al.  The Use of Sonication for the Efficient Delivery of Plasmid DNA into Cells , 1997, Pharmaceutical Research.

[35]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Intracellular Drug Delivery Using Low-Frequency Ultrasound: Quantification of Molecular Uptake and Cell Viability , 2001, Pharmaceutical Research.