Bioeffects caused by changes in acoustic cavitation bubble density and cell concentration: a unified explanation based on cell-to-bubble ratio and blast radius.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Mark R Prausnitz | M. Prausnitz | A. McNamara | H. R. Guzmán | D. X. Nguyen | Héctor R Guzmán | Andrew J McNamara | Daniel X Nguyen | H. Guzmán
[1] A. R. Williams. Ultrasound : biological effects and potential hazards , 1983 .
[2] H. Saunders,et al. Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications , 1984 .
[3] S. Zimmer,et al. Transfection of mammalian cells with plasmid DNA by scrape loading and sonication loading. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[4] R. Roemer,et al. Heat transfer in bioengineering and medicine , 1987 .
[5] J. Ellwart,et al. Cell membrane damage by ultrasound at different cell concentrations. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[6] J. Seifert,et al. The mechanisms of stone disintegration by shock waves. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[7] R. Apfel,et al. Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[8] J. Weaver,et al. A quantitative study of electroporation showing a plateau in net molecular transport. , 1993, Biophysical journal.
[9] T. Leighton. The Acoustic Bubble , 1994 .
[10] R. M. Thomas,et al. Ultrasound contrast agents nucleate inertial cavitation in vitro. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[11] S. Kaul,et al. Hemodynamic characteristics, myocardial kinetics and microvascular rheology of FS-069, a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent capable of producing myocardial opacification from a venous injection. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[12] Morton W. Miller,et al. A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[13] T J Flotte,et al. Physical characteristics and biological effects of laser-induced stress waves. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[14] M. Miller,et al. Hemolysis of albunex-supplemented, 40% hematocrit human erythrocytes in vitro by 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound: acoustic pressure and pulse length dependence. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[15] E. Balcer-Kubiczek,et al. In vitro mechanisms of chemopotentiation by tone-burst ultrasound. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[16] Douglas L. Miller,et al. Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[17] D. Miller,et al. Ultrasonically induced hemolysis at high cell and gas body concentrations in a thin-disc exposure chamber. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[18] K. Takayama,et al. Dynamic behavior of bubbles during extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[19] J F Greenleaf,et al. Artificial cavitation nuclei significantly enhance acoustically induced cell transfection. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[20] J. Morris,et al. Sonoporation of cultured cells in the rotating tube exposure system. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[21] A. Brayman,et al. Transient poration and cell surface receptor removal from human lymphocytes in vitro by 1 MHz ultrasound. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[22] Douglas L. Miller,et al. Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast‐agent gas bodies , 1999 .
[23] L A Crum,et al. Effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound on whole blood with and without microbubble contrast agent. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[24] J D Thomas,et al. Ten-fold augmentation of endothelial uptake of vascular endothelial growth factor with ultrasound after systemic administration. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[25] Junru Wu,et al. Experimental study of the effects of Optison concentration on sonoporation in vitro. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[26] W L Nyborg,et al. Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part II: general review. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[27] M. Dake,et al. High-efficiency endovascular gene delivery via therapeutic ultrasound. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[28] E. Unger,et al. Gene Delivery Using Ultrasound Contrast Agents , 2001, Echocardiography.
[29] M. Prausnitz,et al. Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. II. Heterogeneous effects on cells. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] M. Prausnitz,et al. Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. I. Quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] M. Prausnitz,et al. Sonoluminescence as an indicator of cell membrane disruption by acoustic cavitation. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[32] Junru Wu,et al. Theoretical study on shear stress generated by microstreaming surrounding contrast agents attached to living cells. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[33] M. Prausnitz,et al. Equilibrium loading of cells with macromolecules by ultrasound: effects of molecular size and acoustic energy. , 2002, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.
[34] A. D'emanuele,et al. The Use of Sonication for the Efficient Delivery of Plasmid DNA into Cells , 1997, Pharmaceutical Research.
[35] M. Prausnitz,et al. Intracellular Drug Delivery Using Low-Frequency Ultrasound: Quantification of Molecular Uptake and Cell Viability , 2001, Pharmaceutical Research.