Measuring the leanness of manufacturing systems-A case study of Ford Motor Company and General Motors

In spite of the vast research published on lean manufacturing systems in several disciplines in the last decade, the concept remains underdeveloped for two reasons. First, it lacks a generally accepted definition. Different authors define lean in terms of its objectives, which vary, overlap and differ in different firms. Second, no study has developed a systematic and relative measure of lean production systems. With the lack of such a measure, two companies cannot be rated objectively on their progress toward becoming lean. This paper has two goals: first, to define manufacturing leanness as a unifying concept, and, second, to develop a systematic, long-term measure of leanness. Manufacturing leanness is a strategy to incur less input to better achieve the organization's goals through producing better output. The systematic measure of leanness has seven characteristics: relative, dynamic, long-term fuzzy logical, objective, integrative and comprehensive. The leanness measure utilizes the fuzzy-logic methodology since lean is a matter of degree. Applying the measure to compare the production leanness of Ford Motor Company and General Motors, the paper selects Honda Motor Company as the benchmarking firm. Selecting just-in-time (JIT), Kaizen, and quality controls as lean attributes, the paper uses surrogates for these attributes extracted from audited financial statements over the years 2001-2003. The results show that Ford's system is more than 17% leaner than GM's system vis-a-vis the benchmarked company's system.

[1]  S. M. James‐Moore,et al.  Is lean manufacture universally relevant? An investigative methodology , 1997 .

[2]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information , 1988 .

[3]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  Creating Lean Suppliers: Diffusing Lean Production through the Supply Chain , 1997 .

[4]  Peter Kolesar,et al.  The relevance of research on statistical process control to the total quality movement , 1993 .

[5]  P. Drucker The Effective Executive , 2016 .

[6]  O. N. Garcia,et al.  Knowledge and Data Engineering: An Outlook , 1989 .

[7]  L. A. Zedeh Knowledge representation in fuzzy logic , 1989 .

[8]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance , 2003 .

[9]  Max Allway,et al.  Shifting to lean service: Stealing a page from manufacturers' playbooks , 2002 .

[10]  Yasuhiro Monden Toyota Management System: Linking the Seven Key Functional Areas , 1993 .

[11]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  PRUF—a meaning representation language for natural languages , 1978 .

[12]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[13]  John Y. Shook,et al.  Bringing the Toyota Production System to the United States: A Personal Perspective , 1997 .

[14]  William G. Sullivan,et al.  EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DECISIONS AND LEAN MANUFACTURING , 2002 .

[15]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  Cracking the code of business , 2000 .

[16]  Christian Berggren Alternatives to Lean Production: Work Organization in the Swedish Auto Industry , 1993 .

[17]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  THE ROLE OF INFRASTRUCTURE PRACTICES IN THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JIT PRACTICES: IMPLICATIONS FOR PLANT COMPETITIVENESS , 2003 .

[18]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .