Mechanically unfolding proteins: The effect of unfolding history and the supramolecular scaffold

The mechanical resistance of a folded domain in a polyprotein of five mutant I27 domains (C47S, C63S I27)5is shown to depend on the unfolding history of the protein. This observation can be understood on the basis of competition between two effects, that of the changing number of domains attempting to unfold, and the progressive increase in the compliance of the polyprotein as domains unfold. We present Monte Carlo simulations that show the effect and experimental data that verify these observations. The results are confirmed using an analytical model based on transition state theory. The model and simulations also predict that the mechanical resistance of a domain depends on the stiffness of the surrounding scaffold that holds the domain in vivo, and on the length of the unfolded domain. Together, these additional factors that influence the mechanical resistance of proteins have important consequences for our understanding of natural proteins that have evolved to withstand force.

[1]  M. Rief,et al.  Single molecule force spectroscopy of spectrin repeats: low unfolding forces in helix bundles. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  R. Merkel,et al.  Energy landscapes of receptor–ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy , 1999, Nature.

[3]  I R Vetter,et al.  Solid-state synthesis and mechanical unfolding of polymers of T4 lysozyme. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Matthias Rief,et al.  Elastically Coupled Two-Level Systems as a Model for Biopolymer Extensibility , 1998 .

[5]  J. Fritz,et al.  Force-mediated kinetics of single P-selectin/ligand complexes observed by atomic force microscopy. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  W. Linke,et al.  Towards a molecular understanding of the elasticity of titin. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  A. Ikai,et al.  Mechanical unfolding of a2‐macroglobulin molecules with atomic force microscope , 1996 .

[8]  Wolfgang A. Linke,et al.  Reverse engineering of the giant muscle protein titin , 2002, Nature.

[9]  S. Smith,et al.  Folding-unfolding transitions in single titin molecules characterized with laser tweezers. , 1997, Science.

[10]  P. Hansma,et al.  Kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of titin unfolding , 2001 .

[11]  R. M. Simmons,et al.  Elasticity and unfolding of single molecules of the giant muscle protein titin , 1997, Nature.

[12]  H Li,et al.  Atomic force microscopy reveals the mechanical design of a modular protein. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. Toca-Herrera,et al.  A simple method for probing the mechanical unfolding pathway of proteins in detail , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  E. Evans,et al.  Strength of a weak bond connecting flexible polymer chains. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[15]  E. Evans,et al.  Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[16]  V. Daggett,et al.  Can non-mechanical proteins withstand force? Stretching barnase by atomic force microscopy and molecular dynamics simulation. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Siegfried Labeit,et al.  Titins: Giant Proteins in Charge of Muscle Ultrastructure and Elasticity , 1995, Science.

[18]  G. I. Bell.  Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[19]  S. Radford,et al.  The effect of core destabilization on the mechanical resistance of I27. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[20]  W. Linke,et al.  Nature of PEVK-titin elasticity in skeletal muscle. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Mario Viani,et al.  Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites , 1999, Nature.

[22]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Mechanical unfolding of a titin Ig domain: structure of unfolding intermediate revealed by combining AFM, molecular dynamics simulations, NMR and protein engineering. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  M. Rief,et al.  Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM. , 1997, Science.

[24]  A. Oberhauser,et al.  Multiple conformations of PEVK proteins detected by single-molecule techniques , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Clarke,et al.  Mechanical and chemical unfolding of a single protein: a comparison. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.