A tripartite approach to operator-error evaluation in ballast water management system operation

Abstract This paper presents a new methodology developed to quantitatively analyze and prioritize the contributions of Human Factors (HFs) in the human-machine-interaction (HMI) within a complex sociotechnical system such as a Ballast Water Management (BWM) System. The methodology is a combination of the Human Factor Analysis Classification System (HFACS), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and a modified version of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) known as the Radial Dynamics Model (RDM). The methodology (HFACS-AHP-RDM) is based on a five-step algorithm, with which data from experts’ judgment was analyzed. A human-error and system risk minimization hierarchy was subsequently proposed to improve human performance and minimize the likelihood of an unwanted event such as the discharge of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens (HAOPs). The result from the study in order of hierarchy showed fatigue, training and complex automation to be the HFs with the greatest impacts on BWM operations. Minimizing their impact, therefore, will have the greatest positive contribution on the performance of the system. Relevance to industry The study's outcome shall help decision makers in prioritizing limited resources (e.g. time and money) allocation to resolving only issues related to HFs with the greatest impact on BWM System's performance. The new methodology could also be applicable in assessing the relative impacts of subjective criteria like HFs in complex sociotechnical systems other than BWM Systems.

[1]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[2]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  A HUMAN ERROR APPROACH TO AVIATION ACCIDENT ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[3]  David S. Cochran,et al.  Reviewing TRIZ from the perspective of Axiomatic Design , 2000 .

[4]  D A Wiegmann,et al.  Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: application of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification system (HFACS). , 2001, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[5]  Christine Chauvin,et al.  Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Emre Akyuz,et al.  A marine accident analysing model to evaluate potential operational causes in cargo ships , 2017 .

[7]  Metin Celik,et al.  Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Michael Baldauf,et al.  Accident investigation reporting deficiencies related to organizational factors in machinery space fires and explosions. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Zaili Yang,et al.  A Human and Organisational Factors (HOFS) Analysis Method for Marine Casualties Using HFACS-Maritime Accidents (HFACS-MA) , 2013 .

[10]  P C Cacciabue,et al.  Human factors impact on risk analysis of complex systems. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[11]  J Reason,et al.  The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  Hongwei Zhang,et al.  A COMPARISON OF TRIZ AND AXIOMATIC DESIGN , 2000 .

[13]  Frank H Hawkins,et al.  Human Factors in Flight , 1987 .

[14]  Jonathan Histon,et al.  Identifying Emerging Human Factors Risks in North American Airline Operations , 2014 .

[15]  Masao Furusho,et al.  Relationship between latent conditions and the characteristics of holes in marine accidents based on the Swiss cheese model , 2016 .

[16]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Enhancing Robust Design with the Aid of TRIZ and Axiomatic Design , 2007 .

[17]  Aykut I. Ölçer,et al.  Technique selection and evaluation of ballast water management methods under an intuitionistic fuzzy environment: An information axiom approach , 2017 .