This report examines the economic feasibility of underground mining for crushed rock aggregates in the UK, but particularly in the London, South East and East of England regions (the South East area of England). These regions import substantial volumes of crushed rock, primarily from the East Midlands and South West regions, requiring relatively long transport distances to market for this bulk commodity. A key part of the research was to determine whether or not aggregate could be produced and delivered to a local market from an underground aggregates operation at a cost comparable with that for production and transport of the commodity from traditional surface quarries located further afield. In essence the investigation asked – could the reduced transport costs compensate for the higher production costs underground so that underground crushed rock aggregates producers can compete with the established Leicestershire and Somerset surface quarries exporting to the South East?
Work Programme
The research effort involved establishing and verifying cost models for aggregates production, stone processing (sizing and sorting), haulage of product to market, environmental impact mitigation, health and safety, decommissioning and restoration. Another major element of the work was the re-examination of the BGS exploratory borehole and geophysical databases to identify potential areas of crushed rock aggregates resource at depth in the South East area of England. Land use pressure is typically higher in this area of England than elsewhere so another major part of the research was the identification of potential concurrent uses of land around the surface facilities of underground aggregates mines. The value, development costs for specific developments and determination of yields expected, from these uses were estimated. These were also used to investigate potential economic benefits associated with after uses of remediated surface land above potential underground aggregates mines and also for the new underground space that would be created. Key technical issues such as subsidence within relatively heavily populated areas of the South East area of England were also addressed.
Economic Results
The discounted cost of aggregate delivered at a discount rate of 10% was the metric used to appraise the options. This is the price of aggregate that leads to a zero net present value of project cash flows realised over the aggregates project life. The results show that the discounted costs of aggregate delivered to a local South East area of England market from an underground mine producing 3.5 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) of crushed rock aggregates, are in the range of £13.03 per tonne to £13.93 per tonne for the top six prospect locations. These are greater than the corresponding cost for a “reference” quarry in Leicestershire producing 3.5 MTPA (£10.95 per tonne), but lower than a “reference” quarry in Leicestershire producing 1.25 MTPA (£16.48 per tonne). These figures indicate that underground crushed rock aggregate mines located within the South East area of England may be able to compete for a share in the overall market by replacing / displacing aggregate imported from the quarries in Leicestershire and Somerset producing around or less than 1.25 MTPA. The surprise in these figures is not really that the more remote surface quarry has a lower discounted cost of aggregate delivered, but that the values for the quarry and underground mine are so close. The capital intensity for the development of underground aggregates mines was found to be higher than that required for surface quarries of comparable scale, by a factor ranging from 1.33 to 1.65 and thus may represent a disincentive for aggregates operators.
Carbon Emissions
The total carbon emissions of the ‘reference’ 3.5 MTPA quarry in Leicestershire were estimated at 9.28 kg CO2/tonne aggregate delivered and this is to be compared with carbon emissions for the 150 metre deep underground mines serving the local market which were estimated at 9.31 kg CO2/tonne delivered for a Bletchley prospect using an adit to access the sub-surface and 14.25 kg CO2/tonne delivered for a prospect based on the Chitty bore hole using a shaft. Depth of the mine is a key factor in determination of the relative carbon emissions from each of the underground mining operations considered as electricity consumption for ventilation, pumping and winding is proportional to depth.
Recommendations
The current research generated seven principal recommendations which are discussed in detail in the concluding section of the report. These are:
Appraise policy incentives for underground aggregates mining.
Conduct an industry-wide consultation on findings from the current research.
Obtain public and stakeholder opinion on new uses for underground space.
Conduct research to reducing the energy intensity of mine services.
Develop a deep level aggregates-specific drilling campaign.
Investigate underground aggregates mines developed from existing surface quarries.
Investigate underground aggregates as co-products of industrial minerals mining.
[1]
William Leith,et al.
Geologic and engineering constraints on the feasibility of clandestine nuclear testing by decoupling in large underground cavities
,
2000
.
[2]
W. Maybee,et al.
PILLAR DESIGN IN HARD BRITTLE ROCKS
,
2000
.
[3]
Karlheinz Spitz,et al.
Mining and the Environment: From Ore to Metal
,
2008
.
[4]
Michael H. Stephenson,et al.
The present and future use of ‘land’ below ground
,
2009
.
[5]
F. M. McEvoy,et al.
Digging the backyard: Mining and quarrying in the UK and their impact on future land use
,
2009
.
[6]
Kari Rauhala,et al.
Underground space in land-use planning
,
1998
.
[7]
D. E. Highley,et al.
Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) and future aggregate extraction : in the East Midlands region
,
2004
.
[8]
C. Hansen,et al.
Table 2
,
2002,
Equality and Non-Discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights.
[9]
P J Lunder,et al.
Determination of the strength of hard-rock mine pillars
,
1997
.
[10]
Nilay Shah,et al.
The need for indigenous aggregates production in England
,
2008
.
[11]
John Stocks.
The production of aggregates by underground mining methods-development of a simulation technique for prefeasibility analysis
,
1979
.
[12]
F. Tagwerker.
Vitamin Supply and Its Influence on the Resistance of Poultry to Infectious Diseases, Parasite Infestation, and Other Stresses.
,
1962
.
[13]
Kermit Allen,et al.
Eminence Dome - Natural-Gas Storage In Salt Comes of Age
,
1972
.
[14]
A. Davies,et al.
On Two Deep Borings at Calvert Station (North Buckinghamshire) and on the Palæozoic Floor north of the Thames
,
1913,
Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London.
[15]
B. O'brien,et al.
Willingness to Pay
,
1994,
Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[16]
D. J. Evans,et al.
A review of underground fuel storage events and putting risk into perspective with other areas of the energy supply chain
,
2009
.
[17]
Chuan Yi Tang,et al.
A 2.|E|-Bit Distributed Algorithm for the Directed Euler Trail Problem
,
1993,
Inf. Process. Lett..
[18]
N. Smith.
The deep geology of central England; the prospectivity of the Palaeozoic rocks
,
1987
.
[19]
R. Stewart.
3 – Waste management
,
2010
.
[20]
M. Mitchell.
The age of the Dinantian (Lower Carboniferous) rocks proved beneath the Kent Coalfield
,
1981,
Geological Magazine.
[21]
Dimitris Kaliampakos,et al.
Underground aggregate mining in Athens: a promising investment plan
,
2001
.
[22]
Pierre Berest,et al.
A salt cavern abandonment test
,
2001
.
[23]
Raymond L. Sterling,et al.
Geoengineering Considerations In The Optimum Use Of Underground Space
,
2000
.
[24]
K. Ambrose,et al.
New data on the stratigraphy and geophysics in the area around Hollowell, Northamptonshire, provided by a coal exploration borehole
,
1987
.
[25]
W. A. Hustrulid,et al.
Underground mining methods : engineering fundamentals and international case studies
,
2001
.
[26]
R. A. Chadwick,et al.
Underground gas storage : worldwide experiences and future development in the UK and Europe
,
2009
.
[27]
Charles Hansen.
Table A.3
,
2007
.
[28]
D. Kaliampakos,et al.
Construction, storage capacity and economics of an underground warehousing – logistics center in Athens, Greece
,
2004
.
[29]
S. F. Hobbs,et al.
Collation of the results of the 2005 Aggregate Minerals Survey for England and Wales
,
2007
.