Comparative study on quality of scanned images from varying materials and surface conditions of standardized model for dental scanner evaluation

The article 'Comparative study on quality of scanned images from varying materials and surface conditions of standardized model for dental scanner evaluation' authored by Ju-Hee Park, Jeong-Hwan Seol, Jun Jae Lee, Seung-Pyo Lee, Young-Jun Lim, published in June issue [Vol 34, No 2] of Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (2018), has an erratum. The author's affiliation was mistakenly given as Jun Jae Lee (Vol 34, No 2, page 115). It should be corrected as Jun Jae Lee.

[1]  Takashi Miyazaki,et al.  A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. , 2009, Dental materials journal.

[2]  I. Naert,et al.  Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. , 2016, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  Wael Att,et al.  The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. , 2014, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[4]  E. Yuzbasioglu,et al.  Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes , 2014, BMC oral health.

[5]  Richard van Noort,et al.  The future of dental devices is digital. , 2012 .

[6]  Jong-Hoon Choi,et al.  Review of recent developments for intra-oral scanners , 2015 .

[7]  R. Nedelcu,et al.  Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  T K Schleyer.  Digital dentistry in the computer age. , 1999, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[9]  Ji-Hwan Kim,et al.  Three-dimensional evaluation on the repeatability and reproducibility of dental scanner-based digital models , 2012 .

[10]  Sebastian B. M. Patzelt,et al.  Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners , 2014, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[11]  Tamer Abdelazim Mellik,et al.  Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  Andreas Syrek,et al.  Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[13]  Jae-Hong Kim,et al.  Reliability and Accuracy of Digital Impression Obtained from CS-3500 Intraoral Scanner , 2015 .

[14]  Ki-Baek Kim,et al.  Evaluation of Dimensional Stability of Digital Dental Model Fabricated by Impression Scanning Method , 2014 .

[15]  Gary Davidowitz,et al.  The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. , 2011, Dental clinics of North America.

[16]  J. Güth,et al.  Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[17]  Wael Att,et al.  Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. , 2013, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[18]  M. Cune,et al.  Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  M. Jeffcoat,et al.  A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  Jin-Hun Jeon,et al.  Evaluation of the Model Accuracy according to Three Types of Dental Scanner , 2015 .