Variations of microstructure, mineral density and tissue elasticity in B6/C3H mice.

200-MHz scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) and synchrotron radiation microCT (SR-microCT) were used to assess microstructural parameters, acoustic impedance Z and tissue degree of mineralization of bone (DMB) in site-matched regions of interest in femoral bone of two inbred strains. Transverse femoral sections taken from 5 C57BL/6J@Ico (B6) and 5 C3H/HeJ@Ico (C3H) mice (5.5 months old) were explored. Mass density rho, elastic coefficient c(11) and Young's modulus E(1) were locally derived in the distal epiphysis, distal metaphysis for trabecular bone and mid-diaphysis for cortical bone using a rule-of-mixture model. Structural parameter estimations obtained from X-ray tomographic and acoustic images were almost identical. Both strains had the same bone diameter, but the C3H mice had greater cortical thickness and smaller cancellous diameter than did B6 mice. The average DMB and impedance values were in the range between 1.13 and 1.33 g cm(-3) and 5.8 and 7.8 Mrayl, respectively. All tissue parameters were lower in B6 mice than in C3H mice. However, interstrain differences of DMB were much less (up to 3.8%) than differences of Z (up to 13.2%). SAM and SR-microCT fulfill the requirement for a simultaneous evaluation of cortical bone microstructure and material properties at the tissue level. However, SAM provides a quantitative estimate of elastic properties at the tissue level that cannot be captured by SR-microCT. The strong differences in the measured acoustic impedances among the two inbred strains indicate that the impedance is a good parameter to detect genetic variations of the skeletal phenotype in small animal models.

[1]  F Peyrin,et al.  A method for the automatic characterization of bone architecture in 3D mice microtomographic images. , 2003, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.

[2]  C. Ackert-Bicknell,et al.  Genetic variation in femur extrinsic strength in 29 different inbred strains of mice is dependent on variations in femur cross-sectional geometry and bone density. , 2005, Bone.

[3]  C. Slemenda,et al.  The genetics of proximal femur geometry, distribution of bone mass and bone mineral density , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[4]  R Müller,et al.  Variation in Bone Biomechanical Properties, Microstructure, and Density in BXH Recombinant Inbred Mice , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  G. Pharr,et al.  Microstructural elasticity and regional heterogeneity in human femoral bone of various ages examined by nano-indentation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  M. Lafage-Proust,et al.  Lower bone cellular activities in male and female mature C3H/HeJ mice are associated with higher bone mass and different pyridinium crosslink profiles compared to C57BL/6J mice , 2003, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[7]  R. Recker,et al.  Genetic Variations in Bone Density, Histomorphometry, and Strength in Mice , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.

[8]  J. M. Somerville,et al.  Growth of C57Bl/6 Mice and the Material and Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone from the Tibia , 2004, Calcified Tissue International.

[9]  K. Raum,et al.  Multilayer analysis: quantitative scanning acoustic microscopy for tissue characterization at a microscopic scale , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  F Peyrin,et al.  Site-matched assessment of structural and tissue properties of cortical bone using scanning acoustic microscopy and synchrotron radiation μCT , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Kay Raum,et al.  Assessment of composition and anisotropic elastic properties of secondary osteon lamellae. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  M. Brodt,et al.  Accuracy of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) for assessing area and density of mouse cortical bone. , 2003, Calcified tissue international.

[13]  P Cloetens,et al.  A synchrotron radiation microtomography system for the analysis of trabecular bone samples. , 1999, Medical physics.

[14]  Kay Raum,et al.  Frequency and resolution dependence of the anisotropic impedance estimation in cortical bone using time-resolved scanning acoustic microscopy. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[15]  Robin O Cleveland,et al.  Derivation of elastic stiffness from site-matched mineral density and acoustic impedance maps , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  A. Laib,et al.  The use of micro-CT to evaluate cortical bone geometry and strength in nude rats: correlation with mechanical testing, pQCT and DXA. , 2006, Bone.

[17]  F. Peyrin,et al.  Assessment of bone structure and acoustic impedance in C3H and BL6 mice using high resolution scanning acoustic microscopy. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[18]  G. Pharr,et al.  The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar: results from two microscopic measurement techniques. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Quantification of the degree of mineralization of bone in three dimensions using synchrotron radiation microtomography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[21]  Laurence Vico,et al.  Tail Suspension Induces Bone Loss in Skeletally Mature Mice in the C57BL/6J Strain but Not in the C3H/HeJ Strain , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Beam theory strongly underestimates bone tissue properties in a murine model of bone genetics , 2006 .

[23]  R Müller,et al.  Genetic Regulation of Cortical and Trabecular Bone Strength and Microstructure in Inbred Strains of Mice , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[24]  J. Rho,et al.  Bone Intrinsic Material Properties in Three Inbred Mouse Strains , 2004, Calcified Tissue International.

[25]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Bone microstructure and elastic tissue properties are reflected in QUS axial transmission measurements. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  C. Slemenda,et al.  Long-Term Bone Loss in Men: Effects of Genetic and Environmental Factors , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[27]  Stefan Judex,et al.  Genetically Based Influences on the Site‐Specific Regulation of Trabecular and Cortical Bone Morphology , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[28]  R. Recker,et al.  Bone Response to In Vivo Mechanical Loading in Two Breeds of Mice , 1998, Calcified Tissue International.

[29]  C. Slemenda,et al.  Genetic determinants of bone mass in adult women: A reevaluation of the twin model and the potential importance of gene interaction on heritability estimates , 1991, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[30]  J. Hopper,et al.  Genetic determinants of bone mass in adults. A twin study. , 1987, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[31]  L. Donahue,et al.  Genetic variability in adult bone density among inbred strains of mice. , 1996, Bone.

[32]  J. Rho,et al.  Atomic force microscopy and nanoindentation characterization of human lamellar bone prepared by microtome sectioning and mechanical polishing technique. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.