One more tool for the food aid toolbox? Experimental evidence on food aid packaging

Abstract International food assistance reaches more than 90 million people per year, much of it through in-kind programs that distribute food. Several key aspects of in-kind programs—what food is shipped, when and from where it is sourced—have been changed to improve program effectiveness and efficiency, becoming helpful tools in the modernized in-kind food assistance toolbox. Packaging—in what food is shipped—remains an unstudied and underused tool despite more than 50 million bags per year passing through in-kind supply chains, affecting program effectiveness and efficiency. We conduct an experiment with 46 shipments using different packaging materials and sizes to measure the effect of packaging on shipment quality, cost, and timeliness. Analyzing the data with randomization tests, we find that, relative to the current materials, new materials maintain shipment quality and cost while improving timeliness and in some cases may reduce cost. One promising material that balances cost and effectiveness is a bag with a biopesticide applied, designed to prevent insects from reproducing. We also find that, relative to the current size, larger bags may improve costs at least in the domestic portion of the supply chain. Donors and their partners should consider packaging as one more tool in the modernized food assistance toolbox. As the toolbox continues to fill, the coming opportunity and challenge to identify situations where the various tools work in complementary ways.

[1]  Polly J. Diven The domestic determinants of US food aid policy , 2001 .

[2]  Erin C. Lentz,et al.  Recipients' Satisfaction with Locally Procured Food Aid Rations: Comparative Evidence from a Three Country Matched Survey , 2013 .

[3]  M. Fisher What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product , 1997 .

[4]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Strategic Supplier Segmentation: The Next “Best Practice” in Supply Chain Management , 1998 .

[5]  Abby Day,et al.  Pathways to Customers: Reducing Complexity in the Logistics Pipeline , 1991 .

[6]  Erin C. Lentz,et al.  Tradeoffs or Synergies? Assessing Local and Regional Food Aid Procurement Through Case Studies in Burkina Faso and Guatemala , 2013 .

[7]  M. Christopher,et al.  Developing Market Specific Supply Chain Strategies , 2002 .

[8]  C. Karakochuk,et al.  Treatment of moderate acute malnutrition with ready-to-use supplementary food results in higher overall recovery rates compared with a corn-soya blend in children in southern Ethiopia: an operations research trial. , 2012, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[9]  T. Marchione Foods provided through U.S. Government Emergency Food Aid Programs: policies and customs governing their formulation, selection and distribution. , 2002, The Journal of nutrition.

[10]  F. Arthur,et al.  Efficacy of Methoprene Applied at Different Temperatures and Rates on Surface Substrates to Control Eggs and Fifth Instars of Plodia interpunctella , 2009, Journal of economic entomology.

[11]  P. Kolsteren,et al.  The Effect of Adding Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food to a General Food Distribution on Child Nutritional Status and Morbidity: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[12]  Martin Christopher,et al.  DESIGNING AND MANAGING MULTIPLE PIPELINES , 2005 .

[13]  J. Parker,et al.  What Drives Program Choice in Food Security Crises? Examining the “Response Analysis” Question , 2013 .

[14]  Christopher B. Barrett,et al.  Food Aid After Fifty Years Recasting Its Role , 2005 .

[15]  Cheryl Christensen The new policy environment for food aid: the challenge of sub-Saharan Africa. , 2000 .

[16]  Luca Alinovi,et al.  Food security in complex emergencies: enhancing food system resilience. , 2005, Disasters.

[17]  L. Wein,et al.  Assessing the Impact of U.S. Food Assistance Delivery Policies on Child Mortality in Northern Kenya , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  S. Pagliusi,et al.  Vaccines, inspiring innovation in health , 2018, Vaccine.

[19]  R. Grais,et al.  Reducing Wasting in Young Children With Preventive Supplementation: A Cohort Study in Niger , 2010, Pediatrics.

[20]  Conor M. McDonald,et al.  Integrating packaging and supply chain decisions: Selection of economic handling unit quantities , 2016 .

[21]  Erin C. Lentz,et al.  The Timeliness and Cost-Effectiveness of the Local and Regional Procurement of Food Aid , 2013 .

[22]  J. Hoddinott,et al.  Cash, Food, or Vouchers? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Northern Ecuador , 2012 .

[23]  F. Soares,et al.  Targeting effectiveness of social cash transfer programmes in three African countries , 2012 .

[24]  D. Holland,et al.  Public nutrition in complex emergencies , 2004, The Lancet.

[25]  Annika Olsson,et al.  Managing Packaging Design for Sustainable Development: A Compass for Strategic Directions , 2016 .

[26]  Christopher B. Barrett,et al.  FOOD SECURITY AND FOOD ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS , 2001 .

[27]  G. d’Agostino,et al.  Addressing Food Insecurity in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Role of Cash Transfers , 2016 .

[28]  Erin C. Lentz,et al.  The Economics and Nutritional Impacts of Food Assistance Policies and Programs , 2013 .

[29]  D. Towill,et al.  Analysis and design of focused demand chains , 2002 .

[30]  Erin C. Lentz,et al.  On the Choice and Impacts of Innovative International Food Assistance Instruments , 2013 .