Prediction of Intrapartum Hypoxia from Cardiotocography Data Using Machine Learning

Uterine contractions produced during labor have the potential to damage a fetus by diminishing the maternal blood flow to the placenta, which can result in fetus hypoxia. In order to observe this phenomenon in practice, labor and delivery are routinely monitored using cardiotocography monitors. The cardiotocography recordings are used by obstetricians to help diagnosis fetus hypoxia. However, cardiotocography capture and interpretation is time consuming and subjective, often leading to misclassification that result in damage to the fetus and unnecessary cesarean sections. Therefore, correct classification is dependent on qualified and experienced obstetric and midwifery staff and their understanding of classification methods. As such, other, more objective measures may help to reduce misclassification among medical practitioners. For example, automatic detection of correlates between uterine contractions and fetal heart rate can be used to reduce unnecessary medical interventions, such as hypoxia and cesarean section, during the first stage of labor and can be instrumental in vaginal delivery in the second. The challenge is to develop predictive algorithms capable of detecting, with high accuracy, when a child is genuinely compromised before medical intervention is considered. This chapter aims to provide a discussion of the requirements for such an approach and discuss a methodology for objectively identifying intrapartum hypoxia.

[1]  C. Marque,et al.  Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  J. Tukey The Future of Data Analysis , 1962 .

[3]  R. Garfield,et al.  Uterine contractility as assessed by abdominal surface recording of electromyographic activity in rats during pregnancy. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  Aly Chkeir,et al.  A multisensor data fusion approach for improving the classification accuracy of uterine EMG signals , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems.

[5]  J. P. Marques de Sá,et al.  The Porto system for automated cardiotocographic signal analysis , 1991, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[6]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[7]  Ping He,et al.  Protein localization prediction using random walks on graphs , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[8]  Rik Vullings,et al.  Reliability of spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Using nonlinear features for fetal heart rate classification , 2012, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[10]  M. Moulden,et al.  A computer system for the numerical analysis of nonstress tests. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[12]  D. Chaffin,et al.  The dimension of chaos in the fetal heart rate. , 1991 .

[13]  Catherine Marque,et al.  Classification of multichannel uterine EMG signals , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  I. Verdenik,et al.  Uterine electrical activity as predictor of preterm birth in women with preterm contractions. , 2001, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[15]  Frank van Bel,et al.  Safe oxygen saturation targeting and monitoring in preterm infants: can we avoid hypoxia and hyperoxia? , 2014, Acta paediatrica.

[16]  B. N. Krupa,et al.  The application of empirical mode decomposition for the enhancement of cardiotocograph signals , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[17]  R. Garfield,et al.  Electrical Activity of the Human Uterus During Pregnancy as Recorded from the Abdominal Surface , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[19]  M. P. Griffin,et al.  Sample entropy analysis of neonatal heart rate variability. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[20]  G. Magenes,et al.  Complexity analysis of the fetal heart rate for the identification of pathology in fetuses , 2005, Computers in Cardiology, 2005.

[21]  João Bernardes,et al.  Complexity-loss in fetal heart rate dynamics during labor as a potential biomarker of acidemia. , 2014, Early human development.

[22]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Open access intrapartum CTG database , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[23]  Paulo Gonçalves,et al.  Adaptive Multiscale Complexity Analysis of Fetal Heart Rate , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Automatic Evaluation of FHR Recordings from CTU-UHB CTG Database , 2013, ITBAM.

[25]  D. Moster,et al.  Delay in intervention increases neonatal morbidity in births monitored with cardiotocography and ST‐waveform analysis , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[26]  Maria G. Signorini,et al.  Monitoring Fetal Heart Rate during Pregnancy: Contributions from Advanced Signal Processing and Wearable Technology , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[27]  Maria Romano,et al.  Outliers Detection and Processing in CTG Monitoring , 2014 .

[28]  G. M. Taylor,et al.  The development and validation of an algorithm for real‐time computerised fetal heart rate monitoring in labour , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[29]  João Bernardes,et al.  Comparison of fetal heart rate baseline estimation by SisPorto 2.01 and a consensus of clinicians. , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[30]  H. Deutsch Principle Component Analysis , 2004 .

[31]  G. Fele-Zorz,et al.  A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[32]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Discriminating Normal from "Abnormal" Pregnancy Cases Using an Automated FHR Evaluation Method , 2014, SETN.

[33]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Can the reproducibility of fetal heart rate baseline estimation be improved? , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[34]  Doina Precup,et al.  Identification of the Dynamic Relationship Between Intrapartum Uterine Pressure and Fetal Heart Rate for Normal and Hypoxic Fetuses , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Asphyxia from the eyes of the obstetrician , 2014 .

[36]  J A Crowe,et al.  Detrended fluctuation analysis: a suitable method for studying fetal heart rate variability? , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[37]  C. Rabotti,et al.  Accuracy of Frequency-Related Parameters of the Electrohysterogram for Predicting Preterm Delivery: A Review of the Literature , 2009, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[38]  J. V. van Laar,et al.  Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability for fetal surveillance: review of the literature , 2008, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[39]  Chrysostomos D. Stylios,et al.  Predicting the risk of metabolic acidosis for newborns based on fetal heart rate signal classification using support vector machines , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  William L. Maner,et al.  Identification of Human Term and Preterm Labor using Artificial Neural Networks on Uterine Electromyography Data , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[41]  José Francisco Martínez Trinidad,et al.  An Empirical Study of Oversampling and Undersampling Methods for LCMine an Emerging Pattern Based Classifier , 2013, MCPR.

[42]  Hasan Ocak,et al.  A Medical Decision Support System Based on Support Vector Machines and the Genetic Algorithm for the Evaluation of Fetal Well-Being , 2013, Journal of Medical Systems.

[43]  Sandra Rees,et al.  Fetal and neonatal origins of altered brain development. , 2005, Early human development.

[44]  G. Bogdanovic,et al.  Cardiotocography in the Prognosis of Perinatal Outcome , 2014, Medical archives.

[45]  Akihiko Kikuchi,et al.  Nonlinear analyses of heart rate variability in normal and growth-restricted fetuses. , 2006, Early human development.

[46]  Miha Lucovnik,et al.  Accuracy of frequency-related parameters of the electrohysterogram for predicting preterm delivery. , 2010, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[47]  Petr Gajdos,et al.  Human Fetus Health Classification on Cardiotocographic Data Using Random Forests , 2014, ECC.

[48]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Development and evaluation of an algorithm for computer analysis of maternal heart rate during labor , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[49]  Yao-Sheng Lu,et al.  Fetal heart rate analysis using a non-linear baseline and variability estimation method , 2012, 2012 5th International Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics.

[50]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  Automated detection of perinatal hypoxia using time–frequency-based heart rate variability features , 2013, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[51]  Paolo Bifulco,et al.  Computerized Cardiotocography: A Software to Generate Synthetic Signals , 2014 .

[52]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[53]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[54]  Doina Precup,et al.  Classification of Normal and Hypoxic Fetuses From Systems Modeling of Intrapartum Cardiotocography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[55]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[56]  Xiuhua Guo,et al.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Early-Stage Lung Cancer Based on Longitudinal and Balanced Data , 2013, PloS one.

[57]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Classification of foetal heart rate sequences based on fractal features , 1998, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[58]  K. Simpson Labor Management Evidence Update: Potential to Minimize Risk of Cesarean Birth in Healthy Women , 2014, The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing.

[59]  Shuang Song,et al.  Influence of Electrode Placement on Signal Quality for Ambulatory Pregnancy Monitoring , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[60]  A. Ugwumadu,et al.  Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[61]  David C. Hoaglin,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis , 2005 .

[62]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 1996 .

[63]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[64]  Denis Kouame,et al.  New Estimators and Guidelines for Better Use of Fetal Heart Rate Estimators with Doppler Ultrasound Devices , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[65]  Kazuo Maeda,et al.  Modalities of fetal evaluation to detect fetal compromise prior to the development of significant neurological damage , 2014, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[66]  A. Ghaffari,et al.  Performance comparison of neural network training algorithms in modeling of bimodal drug delivery. , 2006, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[67]  James J. Chen,et al.  Class-imbalanced classifiers for high-dimensional data , 2013, Briefings Bioinform..

[68]  H. Abdi,et al.  Principal component analysis , 2010 .

[69]  Philip A. Warrick,et al.  Subspace detection of the impulse response function from intrapartum uterine pressure and fetal heart rate variability , 2013, Computing in Cardiology 2013.

[70]  Maria Romano,et al.  PSD modifications of FHRV due to interpolation and CTG storage rate , 2011, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[71]  Sandra Rees,et al.  An adverse intrauterine environment: implications for injury and altered development of the brain , 2008, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[72]  Declan Devane,et al.  Expert systems for fetal assessment in labour , 2015 .

[73]  Sergio Cerutti,et al.  Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysisof fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[74]  Hasan Ocak,et al.  Prediction of fetal state from the cardiotocogram recordings using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems , 2012, Neural Computing and Applications.

[75]  Virginia Lowe,et al.  Intrapartum fetal surveillance , 2005 .

[76]  Edmond Zahedi,et al.  Antepartum fetal heart rate feature extraction and classification using empirical mode decomposition and support vector machine , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[77]  Cristian Rotariu,et al.  Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability associated with fetal acidosis and base deficit values , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Development and Application Systems (DAS).

[78]  Joakim Andén,et al.  Scattering Transform for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Variability Fractal Analysis: A Case-Control Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[79]  A. B. M. Shawkat Ali,et al.  Computational intelligence for microarray data and biomedical image analysis for the early diagnosis of breast cancer , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[80]  Lee-Ing Tong,et al.  Determining the optimal re-sampling strategy for a classification model with imbalanced data using design of experiments and response surface methodologies , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[81]  Abdulhamit Subasi,et al.  Classification of Fetal State from the Cardiotocogram Recordings using ANN and Simple Logistic , 2010 .

[82]  Neil Salkind,et al.  Statistics for People Who (Think They) Hate Statistics. Third Edition. , 2006 .

[83]  K. Rosen,et al.  Change in heart rate variability in relation to a significant ST‐event associates with newborn metabolic acidosis , 2007 .

[84]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Linear and nonlinear fetal heart rate analysis of normal and acidemic fetuses in the minutes preceding delivery , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[85]  Suzanne Kieffer,et al.  Feature extraction and selection for objective gait analysis and fall risk assessment by accelerometry , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[86]  Joyce A. Mitchell,et al.  Countering imbalanced datasets to improve adverse drug event predictive models in labor and delivery , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[87]  Aly Chkeir,et al.  Combining multiple support vector machines for boosting the classification accuracy of uterine EMG signals , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems.

[88]  Janusz Jezewski,et al.  Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate signals as the predictor of neonatal acidemia , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[89]  Chelsea Dobbins,et al.  Prediction of Preterm Deliveries from EHG Signals Using Machine Learning , 2013, PloS one.

[90]  J. M. Swartjes,et al.  Computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate: 2. Detection of accelerations and decelerations. , 1990, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[91]  G S Dawes,et al.  Baseline in human fetal heart‐rate records , 1982, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[92]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Multifractal analysis of fetal heart rate variability in fetuses with and without severe acidosis during labor. , 2011, American journal of perinatology.

[93]  David W Walker,et al.  Creatine supplementation during pregnancy: summary of experimental studies suggesting a treatment to improve fetal and neonatal morbidity and reduce mortality in high-risk human pregnancy , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[94]  Fay Rycyna Rn Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring , 2006 .

[95]  J. Richman,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[96]  J. Perlin,et al.  Recognition and response to electronic fetal heart rate patterns: impact on newborn outcomes and primary cesarean delivery rate in women undergoing induction of labor. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[97]  Rongwei Fu,et al.  Global neonatal and perinatal mortality: a review and case study for the Loreto Province of Peru , 2012 .

[98]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Comparison of real beat-to-beat signals with commercially available 4 Hz sampling on the evaluation of foetal heart rate variability , 2013, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[99]  Philip A. Warrick,et al.  Discrimination of normal and at-risk populations from fetal heart rate variability , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.

[100]  James F. Antaki,et al.  Prognosis of Right Ventricular Failure in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device Based on Decision Tree With SMOTE , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[101]  G. Saade,et al.  Predicting Term and Preterm Delivery With Transabdominal Uterine Electromyography , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[102]  Rok Blagus,et al.  SMOTE for high-dimensional class-imbalanced data , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[103]  Maria Romano,et al.  Time-frequency analysis of CTG signals , 2009 .

[104]  Cristian Rotariu,et al.  Automatic analysis of the fetal heart rate variability and uterine contractions , 2014, 2014 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical and Power Engineering (EPE).

[105]  Muriel Doret,et al.  Uterine Electromyography Characteristics for Early Diagnosis of Mifepristone-Induced Preterm Labor , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[106]  William McGuire,et al.  Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[107]  Matthew Hogg,et al.  ST analysis for intrapartum fetal monitoring , 2015 .

[108]  Jayawan H. B. Wijekoon,et al.  Continuous objective recording of fetal heart rate and fetal movements could reliably identify fetal compromise, which could reduce stillbirth rates by facilitating timely management. , 2014, Medical hypotheses.

[109]  Holger Maul,et al.  Use of uterine EMG and cervical LIF in monitoring pregnant patients , 2005, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[110]  G. Saade,et al.  Uterine activity during pregnancy and labor assessed by simultaneous recordings from the myometrium and abdominal surface in the rat. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[111]  Miha Lucovnik,et al.  Use of uterine electromyography to diagnose term and preterm labor , 2011, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[112]  S. Donn,et al.  Medico-legal implications of hypoxic-ischemic birth injury. , 2014, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.