Analysis of commercial mini-bus accidents.

This paper presents a study of mini-bus traffic accidents aimed at gaining insight into the factors affecting accident occurrence and severity. Understanding these factors can help to bring forth realistic strategies to improve the safety of these buses. Two disaggregate models related to the time until accident occurrence and the number of accident injuries were specified and estimated. The models were estimated using data collected from 438 mini-bus drivers in Jordan. The estimated models yielded significant associations between the independent variables and both the time until accident occurrence (first, second and third accidents) and their corresponding number of injuries (accident severity). Higher accident rates were associated with drivers who were unmarried, took too few rest breaks and had short time intervals since previous accidents. Lower accident rates were associated with drivers who had long bus-driving and private vehicle-driving experience. The results indicate that the longer a mini-bus driver goes without an accident, the less likely it is that he will have an accident. The results also indicate that previous accident type affects the duration of the upcoming traffic accident. Greater accident severity was associated with single-vehicle accidents, rural intercity routes and speeding. Accident severity decreased and the time between two accidents increased when the previous accident was severe. The results seem to indicate that post- and immediate accident history affect the severity of upcoming accidents. Seven recommendations based on these findings are made in an attempt to improve mini-bus safety.

[1]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[2]  N Stamatiadis,et al.  Trends in highway safety: effects of an aging population on accident propensity. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[4]  Lung-fei Lee,et al.  Specification Test for Poisson Regression Models , 1986 .

[5]  William R. Black,et al.  HIGHWAY ACCIDENTS: A SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[6]  F L Mannering,et al.  Male/female driver characteristics and accident risk: some new evidence. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  N. Kiefer Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions , 1988 .

[8]  Thomas L. Traynor The Peltzman hypothesis revisited: An isolated evaluation of offsetting driver behavior , 1993 .

[9]  G D Jacobs,et al.  A STUDY OF BUS SAFETY IN DELHI , 1982 .

[10]  R B Noland,et al.  Perceived risk and modal choice: risk compensation in transportation systems. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  D C Andreassen SOME ASPECTS OF ACCIDENT COSTING AND COSTS IN AUSTRALIA , 1989 .

[12]  Sarath C. Joshua,et al.  Estimating truck accident rate and involvements using linear and poisson regression models , 1990 .

[13]  Eric Rodgman,et al.  COMMERCIAL BUS ACCIDENT CHARACTERISTICS AND ROADWAY TREATMENTS , 1994 .

[14]  Herman F Huang,et al.  Recommendations for reducing noncollision bus passenger injuries , 1994 .

[15]  Tzuoo-Ding Lin,et al.  TIME OF DAY MODELS OF MOTOR CARRIER ACCIDENT RISK , 1994 .

[16]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  ACCIDENTS, CONVICTIONS, AND DEMERIT POINTS: AN ONTARIO DRIVER RECORDS STUDY , 1989 .

[17]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  Negative binomial analysis of intersection accident frequencies , 1996 .

[18]  A J Courtney,et al.  An analysis of accident data for franchised public buses in Hong Kong. , 1985, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  P P Jovanis,et al.  ANALYSIS OF BUS TRANSIT ACCIDENTS: EMPIRICAL, METHODOLOGICAL AND POLICY ISSUES. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY , 1989 .

[20]  P P Jovanis,et al.  Disaggregate model of highway accident occurrence using survival theory. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  James D Brogan,et al.  USING ACCIDENT RECORDS TO PRIORITIZE ROADSIDE OBSTACLE IMPROVEMENTS IN NEW MEXICO , 1985 .