Accurate placement of the esophageal pH electrode for 24-hour pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe

OBJECTIVE:Accurate placement of a pH electrode requires manometric localization of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Combined manometry/pH devices using water-perfused tubes attached to pH catheters and the use of an electronic “LES locator” have been reported. We investigated whether accurate placement of pH probes can be achieved using such a probe, and whether this may reduce the need for the performance of the usual stepwise pull-back manometry.METHODS:Thirty consecutive patients (15 men, 15 women; median age, 56 yr; interquartile range, 42–68 yr) referred for manometry and pH testing were included in the study. The localization of the LES was determined with standard esophageal manometry. After that, a second 3-mm pH electrode with an internal perfusion port was passed into the stomach. Using this catheter, a single stepwise pull-through manometry was performed and the LES position was noted. LES location, mean pressure, and length obtained with standard manometry were compared to data from the combined pH/manometry catheter. Additionally the time necessary to perform each of the procedures was noted and the patient's discomfort caused by the catheter was evaluated using a standardized questionnaire.RESULTS:The LES location with the pH/manometry probe was proximal to that with standard manometry in 19 patients (63%), the same in nine patients (30%), and distal in two patients (7%). The differences were <2 cm in 29 of 30 (97%) patients. The LES location with the pH/manometry probe required a median of 6.5 min (interquartile range: 3.5–8.5 min) versus a median of 21.5 min (interquartile range: 14.5–26.5 min) for standard manometry (p < 0.0001). In addition, LES evaluation using the combined pH/manometry probe provided accurate data on the resting pressure, as well as overall and intraabdominal length of the LES. All patients tolerated the combination probe better than the standard manometry probe (p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS:Placement of the esophageal electrode for 24-h esophageal pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe is accurate. The technique is simple, time-saving, and convenient for the patients. Because it is possible to accurately evaluate the LES using this technique, it may even replace conventional manometry before pH probe placement.

[1]  R. Hinder,et al.  [Laparoscopic antireflux procedures]. , 1998, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[2]  G. Perdikis,et al.  The surgical option for gastroesophageal reflux disease. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  G. Wetscher,et al.  Tailored Antireflux Surgery for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Effectiveness and Risk of Postoperative Dysphagia , 1997, World Journal of Surgery.

[4]  G. Jamieson,et al.  Is motility impaired in the entire upper gastrointestinal tract in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease? , 1996, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[5]  H. Klein Esophageal transit scintigraphy. , 1995, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[6]  J. Richter,et al.  The LES locator: accurate placement of an electrode for 24-hour pH measurement with a combined solid state pressure transducer. , 1992, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[7]  A. Klauser,et al.  Esophageal 24-h pH monitoring: is prior manometry necessary for correct positioning of the electrode? , 1990, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[8]  R. Hinder,et al.  Clinical use of 24-hour gastric pH monitoring vs o-diisopropyl iminodiacetic acid (DISIDA) scanning in the diagnosis of pathologic duodenogastric reflux. , 1990, Archives of surgery.

[9]  A. Blum,et al.  Technical aspects of intraluminal pH-metry in man: current status and recommendations. , 1987, Gut.

[10]  J. Richter,et al.  Gastroesophageal Reflux: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy , 1982 .

[11]  T R DeMeester,et al.  Technique, indications, and clinical use of 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring. , 1980, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  M. Grossman,et al.  Detection of Gastro-Esophageal Reflux by Simultaneous Measurement of Intraluminal Pressure and pH , 1958, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[13]  R. Hinder,et al.  Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery – Experience and Outcomes , 1997 .

[14]  H. Feußner,et al.  Failure of antireflux surgery: causes and management strategies. , 1996, American journal of surgery.

[15]  D. Castell,et al.  A simplified technique for accurate placement of ambulatory pH probes. , 1991, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[16]  W. Schwizer,et al.  The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. , 1988, American journal of surgery.

[17]  M. Marples,et al.  Can an Oesophageal pH Electrode be Accurately Positioned Without Manometry , 1988 .

[18]  L. Johnson,et al.  Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. , 1974, The American journal of gastroenterology.