AKERS WHILE A DOPTING I NTEGRATION T ECHNOLOGIES

Over the years, the emergence of innovative and revolutionary integration technologies (e.g. Enterprise Application Integration [EAI], Service Oriented Architecture [SOA] and more recently – Cloud Computing) has highly influenced the top management in their decision-making process – decisions that are imperative to transform Local Government Authorities (LGAs). LGAs that plan to adopt such integration technologies may consider this as a serious investment. Advocates however claim that such integration technologies have emerged to overcome the integration problems at all levels (e.g. data, object and process) and offer the opportunity to achieve competitive advantage through integrated Information Technology (IT) infrastructure operations resulting in quality service delivery. With the emergence of electronic government (e-Government) service provisioning, LGAs have turned to integration technologies to fully automate and offer their services on-line and integrate their IT infrastructures. While earlier research on the adoption of integration technologies has considered several factors (e.g. pressure, technological, support, and financial), inadequate attention and resources have been applied in investigating the individual, decision and organisational context factors, influencing top management’s decisions for adopting integration technologies in LGAs. It is a highly considered phenomenon that the success of an organisation’s operations, relies heavily on understanding an individual’s attitudes and behaviours, the surrounding context and the type of decisions taken. Given this increasing importance, this paper attempts to investigate factors influencing decision makers while adopting integration technologies, using two case studies. The findings illustrate two different doctrines – one inclined and receptive towards taking risky decisions, the other disinclined. Several underlying rationales can be attributed to such mind-sets in local government. The authors aim to contribute to the body of knowledge by exploring the factors influencing top management’s decision-making process while adopting integration technologies vital for facilitating LGAs’ operational reforms.

[1]  K. Walshe,et al.  Comprehensive spending review and the NHS , 2015, British medical journal.

[2]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Investigating factors influencing local government decision makers while adopting integration technologies (IntTech) , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Eric A. Marks Service-Oriented Architecture Governance for the Services Driven Enterprise: Marks/Service-Oriented , 2012 .

[4]  M. Brian Blake,et al.  Service-Oriented Computing and Cloud Computing: Challenges and Opportunities , 2010, IEEE Internet Computing.

[5]  Giuseppe Moro,et al.  Evaluation of an e-government project: which are the barriers to e-government integration? , 2010 .

[6]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Evaluating and modelling constructs for e-government decision making , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Justifying the Decisions for EAI Adoption in LGAs: A Validated Proposition of Factors, Adoption Lifecycle Phases, Mapping and Prioritisation of Factors , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Moving from E-Government to T-Government: A Study of Process Reengineering Challenges in a UK Local Authority Context , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[9]  Calvin Meng Lai Chan,et al.  User engagement in e-government systems implementation: A comparative case study of two Singaporean e-government initiatives , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Learning lessons from evaluating eGovernment: Reflective case experiences that support transformational government , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  E-government implementation: A macro analysis of Singapore's e-government initiatives , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Jose M. Cruz,et al.  Dynamics of supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Yaozhong Wu,et al.  Behavioral Operations Management , 2007, Found. Trends Technol. Inf. Oper. Manag..

[14]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Interorganizational information integration: A key enabler for digital government , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Electronic transformation of government in the U.K.: a research agenda , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[17]  Sarah Cotterill,et al.  Transformational Government? The role of information technology in delivering citizen-centric local public services , 2007 .

[18]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  Collaborative e-Government: impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Raymond Wu,et al.  Enterprise integration in e‐government , 2007 .

[20]  Uday M. Apte,et al.  Operations Management in the Information Economy: Information Products, Processes, and Chains , 2007 .

[21]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions , 2006 .

[22]  Perri,et al.  Institutional Shaping of Interagency Working: Managing Tensions between Collaborative Working and Client Confidentiality , 2006 .

[23]  M. M. Kamal,et al.  IT innovation adoption in the government sector: identifying the critical success factors , 2006, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[24]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  An enterprise application integration methodology for e-government , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[25]  Wing Lam,et al.  Barriers to e-government integration , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Wing Lam,et al.  Investigating success factors in enterprise application integration: a case-driven analysis , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Chenhui Wu,et al.  A readiness model for adopting Web services , 2004, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[28]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Local government information technology capacity: an exploratory theory , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[29]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Managing e-transformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Nick Devas,et al.  Local government decision‐making—citizen participation and local accountability: some evidence from Kenya and Uganda , 2003 .

[31]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[32]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Evaluating electronic local government in the UK , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Alfred Kieser,et al.  The Complexity of Rule Systems, Experience and Organizational Learning , 2003 .

[34]  Mark Bevir,et al.  Traditions of Governance: Interpreting the Changing Role of the Public Sector in Comparative and Historical Perspective - eScholarship , 2003 .

[35]  J. Hudson,et al.  Digitising the Structures of Government: The UK's Information Age Government Agenda. , 2002 .

[36]  Derek J. Rollinson,et al.  Organisational Behaviour and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 2002 .

[37]  R. McIvor,et al.  Internet technologies: supporting transparency in the public sector , 2002 .

[38]  Suzanne Beaumaster,et al.  Local government IT implementation issues: a challenge for public administration , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[39]  D. R. Dixon,et al.  The behavioral side of information technology , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[40]  Mark Bailey,et al.  Local government reorganisation in the UK , 1999 .

[41]  D. Chambers,et al.  Strategic decision-making processes: the role of management and context , 1998 .

[42]  R. Lipshitz,et al.  Coping with Uncertainty: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Analysis , 1997 .

[43]  Erwin Schwella,et al.  Decision‐making in local government: selected theoretical perspectives , 1996 .

[44]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  R. Ford,et al.  Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature , 1994 .

[46]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[47]  B. Burrows Culture and organisations. Software of the mind , 1992 .

[48]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[49]  Michael Bommer,et al.  A behavioral model of ethical and unethical decision making , 1987 .

[50]  J. Bernard Keys,et al.  Managerial Decision Making:Japan vs. the US , 1985 .

[51]  Jeffrey Gandz,et al.  The Experience of Workplace Politics , 1980 .

[52]  John E. Dittrich,et al.  Managerial Problem Solving Models: A Review and a Proposal , 1978 .

[53]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[54]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 2017 .

[55]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Journal of Enterprise Information Management Justifying the decisions for EAI implementations : a validated proposition of influential factors , 2016 .

[56]  Julia Kluge,et al.  Corporate Cultures The Rites And Rituals Of Corporate Life , 2016 .

[57]  Susan Sutherland,et al.  CONVERGENCE OF CLOUD COMPUTING, SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE AND ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE , 2013 .

[58]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-Government implementation Challenges: A Case study , 2010, AMCIS.

[59]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Government Value Paradigms - Bureaucracy, New Public Management, and E-Government , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Mark Walport,et al.  Data sharing review. , 2008, Journal.

[61]  Andrew M. Parker,et al.  Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[62]  Arnaldo Oliveira,et al.  A Discussion of Rational and Psychological Decision-Making Theories and Models : The Search for a Cultural-Ethical Decision-Making Model Decision-Making Theories and Models , 2006 .

[63]  J. Ramon Gil-Garcia,et al.  E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[64]  M. Brown,et al.  Learning Organizations in the Public Sector? A Study of Police Agencies Employing Information and Technology To Advance Knowledge. , 2003 .

[65]  Josie Kelly,et al.  Labour's modernization of local government , 2000 .

[66]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  People and computers : the impacts of computing on end users in organizations , 1985 .