Chirp excitation of ultrasonic guided waves.

Most ultrasonic guided wave methods require tone burst excitations to achieve some degree of mode purity while maintaining temporal resolution. In addition, it is often desirable to acquire data using multiple frequencies, particularly during method development when the best frequency for a specific application is not known. However, this process is inconvenient and time-consuming, particularly if extensive signal averaging at each excitation frequency is required to achieve a satisfactory signal-to-noise ratio. Both acquisition time and data storage requirements may be prohibitive if responses from many narrowband tone burst excitations are measured. Here chirp excitations are utilized to address the need to both test at multiple frequencies and achieve a high signal-to-noise ratio to minimize acquisition time. A broadband chirp is used to acquire data at a wide range of frequencies, and deconvolution is applied to extract multiple narrowband responses. After optimizing the frequency and duration of the desired tone burst excitation, a long-time narrowband chirp is used as the actual excitation, and the desired tone burst response is similarly extracted during post-processing. Results are shown that demonstrate the efficacy of both broadband and narrowband chirp excitations.

[1]  Michael L Oelze,et al.  Improved scatterer size estimation using backscatter coefficient measurements with coded excitation and pulse compression. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  H. Ermert,et al.  Chirp signal matching and signal power optimization in pulse-echo mode ultrasonic nondestructive testing , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Joanne Cowe,et al.  Improving performance of pulse compression in a Doppler ultrasound system using amplitude modulated chirps and Wiener filtering. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  D. Schindel,et al.  The use of broadband acoustic transducers and pulse-compression techniques for air-coupled ultrasonic imaging. , 2001, Ultrasonics.

[5]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Efficient Guided Wave SHM Baseline Capture and Selection , 2011 .

[6]  M. K. Andrews,et al.  Noncontact, high-resolution ultrasonic imaging of wood samples using coded chirp waveforms , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  Jennifer E. Michaels,et al.  Multi-mode and multi-frequency guided wave imaging via chirp excitations , 2011, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[8]  B. Koehler,et al.  Improvement of ultrasonic testing of concrete by combining signal conditioning methods, scanning laser vibrometer and space averaging techniques , 1998 .

[9]  V. Giurgiutiu Tuned Lamb Wave Excitation and Detection with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring , 2005 .

[10]  P. Cawley,et al.  The interaction of Lamb waves with defects , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  Akio Nagamune,et al.  Next Generation On-Line Ultrasonic Testing System, Using Real-Time Chirp Pulse Compression Processing , 1996 .

[12]  Sang Jun Lee,et al.  Chirp generated acoustic wavefield images , 2011, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[13]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  A Baseline and Vision of Ultrasonic Guided Wave Inspection Potential , 2002 .

[14]  T. Kundu,et al.  Efficient use of Lamb modes for detecting defects in large plates , 1998 .