Flax look‐alikes: Pitfalls of ancient plant fibre identification

Plant fibres have been used since ancient times in numerous applications ranging from nets and basketry to textiles for clothing. A proper identification of plant fibre remains in archaeological excavations provides important information about resource exploitation and agriculture. In order to identify plant fibres, a series of fibre features—cross-section diameter, lumen diameter, dislocations (nodes), cross markings, cross-section shape and lumen shape—have been defined and characteristic traits of these features for different fibre types established. How suitable these traits really are for fibre identification has been a matter of debate. To resolve this issue, we have performed a systematic investigation of typical textile bast fibres: flax, nettle and hemp. We have investigated cross-section diameter, lumen diameter, dislocations (nodes) and cross markings using standard compound, white light transmission microscopy. Our investigations show that all the traits that are considered characteristic for one type of plant fibre can also, on occasion, be found in other types. This demonstrates that an investigation of the traits listed above is not sufficient to ensure a correct identification of the plant fibre material; in particular, when only a small amount of material is available. This is often the case in archaeological excavations.

[1]  B. Holst,et al.  Determining the fibrillar orientation of bast fibres with polarized light microscopy: the modified Herzog test (red plate test) explained , 2013, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  J. Heinemeier,et al.  Nettle as a distinct Bronze Age textile plant , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Margarita Gleba,et al.  Textiles and Textile Production in Europe: From Prehistory to Ad 400 , 2012 .

[4]  B. Holst,et al.  A procedure for identifying textile bast fibres using microscopy: flax, nettle/ramie, hemp and jute. , 2010, Ultramicroscopy.

[5]  B. Holst,et al.  Comment on “30,000-Year-Old Wild Flax Fibers” , 2010, Science.

[6]  Ofer Bar-Yosef,et al.  30,000-Year-Old Wild Flax Fibers , 2009, Science.

[7]  T. Murphy,et al.  DNA Analysis of Natural Fiber Rope * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  I. Burgert,et al.  Dislocations in single hemp fibres—investigations into the relationship of structural distortions and tensile properties at the cell wall level , 2007 .

[9]  Irina Snigireva,et al.  Identification of single archaeological textile fibres from the cave of letters using synchrotron radiation microbeam diffraction and microfluorescence , 2006 .

[10]  N. Petraco,et al.  Color Atlas and Manual of Microscopy for Criminalists, Chemists, and Conservators , 2003 .

[11]  B. Pettersson,et al.  Fibernodes in flax and other bast fibers , 2002 .

[12]  I. Good Archaeological Textiles: A Review of Current Research , 2001 .

[13]  L. B. Jørgensen North European Textiles until AD. 1000 , 1992 .

[14]  Martha Goodway,et al.  Fiber Identification in Practice , 1987 .

[15]  H. M. Appleyard,et al.  Identification of textile materials , 1985 .

[16]  John Grayson,et al.  Identification of Vegetable Fibres , 1982 .

[17]  Bruno Luniak The identification of textile fibres : qualitative and quantitative analysis of fibre blends , 1953 .

[18]  F. Tobler Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie , 1922, Nature.