Perspectives on the Global Disparity in Ecological Science

Currently, countries with the highest human development index (HDI) dominate the production of ecological research. This is problematic because ecology is a discipline that is highly relevant to the challenges facing countries with lower indices. We characterize the full state of current inequity at the authorship and editorial levels, investigating the relative role of gross domestic product (GDP) versus research investment in driving publication patterns. We find that the representation of low HDI countries decreases dramatically from authorship to editorial levels. GDP was the best predictor of publication rate for high HDI countries, whereas research investment was an equal or better predictor for low HDI countries. In light of our results, we propose an alternative model of knowledge sharing and production that emphasizes (a) increasing equity in the communication of ecological science at a global scale, (b) expanding ecology funding in low HDI countries, and (c) prioritizing ecological science in low HDI regions.

[1]  I. Wallerstein,et al.  The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. , 1975 .

[2]  G. Palma.  Dependency: A formal theory of underdevelopment or a methodology for the analysis of concrete situations of underdevelopment? , 1978 .

[3]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[4]  R. May.  The Scientific Investments of Nations , 1998, Science.

[5]  Davies.  The increasing divide between First and Third Worlds: science, collaboration and conservation of Third World aquatic ecosystems , 1998 .

[6]  V. Toledo,et al.  Applying Ecology in the Third World: The Case of Mexico , 2000 .

[7]  W. Morris,et al.  POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS IN ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY PLANS: PAST USE AND FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS , 2002 .

[8]  M. B. Cahill.  Diminishing returns to GDP and the Human Development Index , 2002 .

[9]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Human Development Index , 2003 .

[11]  W. Easterly,et al.  Can Foreign Aid Buy Growth , 2003 .

[12]  F. Danielsen,et al.  Biodiversity monitoring in developing countries: what are we trying to achieve? , 2003, Oryx.

[13]  S. F. Alatas.  Academic Dependency and the Global Division of Labour in the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[14]  D. King.  The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[15]  P. Altbach.  GLOBALIZATION AND THE UNIVERSITY: MYTHS AND REALITIES IN AN UNEQUAL WORLD , 2004 .

[16]  M. Holmgren,et al.  Science on the Rise in Developing Countries , 2004, PLoS biology.

[17]  R. Kostoff.  The (scientific) wealth of nations , 2004 .

[18]  R. Norgaard,et al.  Practicing Interdisciplinarity , 2005 .

[19]  Ulrike Groemping,et al.  Relative Importance for Linear Regression in R: The Package relaimpo , 2006 .

[20]  C. Stephens,et al.  Indigenous health in Latin America and the Caribbean , 2006, The Lancet.

[21]  Aparna Basu,et al.  Using ISI's 'Highly Cited Researchers' to obtain a country level indicator of citation excellence , 2006, Scientometrics.

[22]  R. Dirzo,et al.  The evolution of ecology in Mexico: facing challenges and preparing for the future , 2006 .

[23]  J. Canadell,et al.  Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  T. Benton,et al.  Microcosm experiments can inform global ecological problems. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  Robert J. W. Tijssen,et al.  Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity , 2008, Scientometrics.

[26]  A. Packer,et al.  Is there science beyond English? , 2007, EMBO reports.

[27]  Matthew E Falagas,et al.  Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[28]  A. Packer,et al.  Articles by Latin American Authors in Prestigious Journals Have Fewer Citations , 2008, PloS one.

[29]  E. Bruna,et al.  The Geographical and Institutional Distribution of Ecological Research in the Tropics , 2008 .

[30]  Ricardo B. Duque,et al.  Internet practice and professional networks in Chilean science: Dependency or progress? , 2009, Scientometrics.

[31]  S. Solomon,et al.  Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  J. Laborde.  Evaluation of research and national scientific journals , 2009 .

[33]  Javier Laborde.  LA EVALUACIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y LAS REVISTAS NACIONALES , 2009 .

[34]  James A. Evans,et al.  Open Access and Global Participation in Science , 2009, Science.

[35]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Characterizing a scientific elite: the social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology , 2010, Scientometrics.

[36]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Biodiversity conservation and livelihoods in human-dominated landscapes: Forest commons in South Asia , 2010 .

[37]  L. Mengoni,et al.  Human Development Index , 2016 .

[38]  T. Pieber,et al.  Women underrepresented on editorial boards of 60 major medical journals. , 2011, Gender medicine.

[39]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Intervention Ecology: Applying Ecological Science in the Twenty-first Century , 2011 .

[40]  E. Gudynas.  Buen vivir: Germinando alternativas al desarrollo , 2011 .

[41]  S. Harmon.  Ambition and Ambivalence: Encouraging a "Sci-Tech Culture" in Argentina through Engagement and Regulatory Reform , 2011 .

[42]  J. Hanspach,et al.  Academia's obsession with quantity. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  R. Cowan,et al.  Global Excellence at the Expense of Local Diffusion, or a Bridge between Two Worlds? Research in Science and Technology in the Developing World , 2012 .

[44]  Alexander Oettl.  Sociology: Honour the helpful , 2012, Nature.

[45]  B. Büscher,et al.  Towards a Synthesized Critique of Neoliberal Biodiversity Conservation , 2012 .

[46]  Jonathan Adams.  Collaborations: The rise of research networks , 2012, Nature.

[47]  Matthew B Jones,et al.  Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  K. Cranston,et al.  Science Incubators: Synthesis Centers and Their Role in the Research Ecosystem , 2013, PLoS biology.

[50]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Predicting Publication Success for Biologists , 2013 .

[51]  C. Kelty,et al.  Disentangling Public Participation In Science and Biomedicine , 2014, Genome Medicine.

[52]  Academic Work at the Periphery: Why Argentine Scholars Are Satisfied, Despite All , 2013 .

[53]  J. Qiu.  China goes back to basics on research funding , 2014, Nature.

[54]  S. Morse,et al.  Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Mustafa F. Özbilgin.  International Human Resource Management , 2014 .

[56]  Cody J. Weinberger,et al.  The Scientific Impact of Nations: Journal Placement and Citation Performance , 2014, PloS one.

[57]  W. Laurance,et al.  Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.