Influence of Packing Phase Parameters in the Optimization of Mechanical, Weight Reduction and Dimensional Properties of Microcellular Foaming Injection Molding of Polypropilene

Microcellular foaming of injected plastics offers the possibility to manufacture parts with reductions in costs and weight if compared with conventional injection molding. For this reason there is an increasing interest in challenging applications such as HEV (hybrid and electrical vehicles) and lightweight material applications in general. Complexity of microcellular injection molding is very high because the final properties of the material obtained depend largely on the processing conditions and these in turn unalterable factors such as mold design and manufacturing. The shrinkage of the molded part must be applied as an oversize of the mold cavity in the design phase. Shrinkage of a microcellular foam depends on the reduction of foam density. Moreover, the piece is designed to get a mechanical performance and meet the dimensional tolerances. Knowing that the reduction of foam density implies a reduction of the mechanical properties and influences the final piece dimensions the conclusion is that the microcellular injection process has a very small process window to fit all these factors. This research focuses on two objectives. First is the variation of post-molding shrinkage in terms of reduction of weight to determine the process window. Second is the determination of mechanical properties which do not show a proportional reduction but exponentially with weight reduction components. The results obtained with a 750 Tons. injection moulding machine equipped with a MuCell plastication unit and a large spiral mold have shown small variations in the dimensions for a predetermined process window and smaller reduction of mechanical properties with weight reductions for 20% talc filled polypropylene. The goal of this applied research is that all experiments have been developed with scaled-industry tools (large injection molding machine, Mucell unit and mold and test parts) comparing with conventional injection molding.