Towards a systematic assessment of assay interference: Identification of extensively tested compounds with high assay promiscuity
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. How Frequently Are Pan-Assay Interference Compounds Active? Large-Scale Analysis of Screening Data Reveals Diverse Activity Profiles, Low Global Hit Frequency, and Many Consistently Inactive Compounds. , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[2] B. Shoichet,et al. A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[3] Jonathan Bisson,et al. Can Invalid Bioactives Undermine Natural Product-Based Drug Discovery? , 2015, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[4] Christopher P Austin,et al. Quantitative analyses of aggregation, autofluorescence, and reactivity artifacts in a screen for inhibitors of a thiol protease. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[5] Michael J. Keiser,et al. Complementarity Between a Docking and a High-Throughput Screen in Discovering New Cruzain Inhibitors† , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[6] Daniel J. Warner,et al. Matched molecular pairs as a medicinal chemistry tool. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[7] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Highly Promiscuous Small Molecules from Biological Screening Assays Include Many Pan-Assay Interference Compounds but Also Candidates for Polypharmacology. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[8] Evan Bolton,et al. PubChem's BioAssay Database , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..
[9] B. Shoichet. Screening in a spirit haunted world. , 2006, Drug discovery today.
[10] J. Baell,et al. Chemistry: Chemical con artists foil drug discovery , 2014, Nature.
[11] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Activity profiles of analog series containing pan assay interference compounds , 2017 .
[12] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Determining the Degree of Promiscuity of Extensively Assayed Compounds , 2016, PloS one.
[13] G. V. Paolini,et al. Global mapping of pharmacological space , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.
[14] Kenneth M Merz,et al. The Ecstasy and Agony of Assay Interference Compounds. , 2017, ACS chemical neuroscience.
[15] Thorsten Meinl,et al. KNIME: The Konstanz Information Miner , 2007, GfKl.
[16] J. Baell,et al. New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[17] Alexander Tropsha,et al. Phantom PAINS: Problems with the Utility of Alerts for Pan-Assay INterference CompoundS , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[18] J. Bajorath,et al. Compound promiscuity: what can we learn from current data? , 2013, Drug discovery today.
[19] John P. Overington,et al. ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..
[20] J. Bajorath,et al. Local structural changes, global data views: graphical substructure-activity relationship trailing. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[21] R. Iyengar,et al. Systems approaches to polypharmacology and drug discovery. , 2010, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[22] J. Irwin,et al. An Aggregation Advisor for Ligand Discovery. , 2015, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[23] Jayme L. Dahlin,et al. Post-HTS case report and structural alert: Promiscuous 4-aroyl-1,5-disubstituted-3-hydroxy-2H-pyrrol-2-one actives verified by ALARM NMR. , 2015, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.
[24] Christopher P Austin,et al. A high-throughput screen for aggregation-based inhibition in a large compound library. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[25] Jameed Hussain,et al. Computationally Efficient Algorithm to Identify Matched Molecular Pairs (MMPs) in Large Data Sets , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[26] A. C. Krueger,et al. Novel hepatitis C virus replicon inhibitors: synthesis and structure-activity relationships of fused pyrimidine derivatives. , 2012, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters.
[27] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. MMP-Cliffs: Systematic Identification of Activity Cliffs on the Basis of Matched Molecular Pairs , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[28] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Entering the ‘big data’ era in medicinal chemistry: molecular promiscuity analysis revisited , 2017, Future science OA.
[29] Jayme L. Dahlin,et al. The Essential Medicinal Chemistry of Curcumin , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[30] Jayme L. Dahlin,et al. PAINS in the Assay: Chemical Mechanisms of Assay Interference and Promiscuous Enzymatic Inhibition Observed during a Sulfhydryl-Scavenging HTS , 2015, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[31] A. Linden,et al. A simple approach for the regioselective synthesis of imidazo[1,2 -a ]pyrimidiones and pyrimido[1,2 -a]pyrimidinones , 2006 .
[32] Michael M. Hann,et al. RECAP-Retrosynthetic Combinatorial Analysis Procedure: A Powerful New Technique for Identifying Privileged Molecular Fragments with Useful Applications in Combinatorial Chemistry , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[33] John J. Irwin,et al. ZINC 15 – Ligand Discovery for Everyone , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[34] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Matched molecular pairs derived by retrosynthetic fragmentation , 2014 .
[35] Jonathan B Baell,et al. Feeling Nature's PAINS: Natural Products, Natural Product Drugs, and Pan Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS). , 2016, Journal of natural products.