Application of trace-norm and low-rank matrix decomposition for computational anatomy

We propose a generative model to distinguish normal anatomical variations from abnormal deformations given a group of images with normal and abnormal subjects. We assume that abnormal subjects share common factors which characterize the abnormality. These factors are hard to discover due to large variance of normal anatomical differences. Assuming that the deformation fields are parametrized by their stationary velocity fields, these factors constitute a low-rank subspace (abnormal space) that is corrupted by high variance normal anatomical differences. We assume that these normal anatomical variations are not correlated. We form an optimization problem and propose an efficient iterative algorithm to recover the low-rank subspace. The algorithm iterates between image registration and the decomposition steps and hence can be seen as a group-wise registration algorithm. We apply our method on synthetic and real data and discover abnormality of the population that cannot be recovered by some of the well-known matrix decompositions (e.g. Singular Value Decomposition).

[1]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Symmetric Log-Domain Diffeomorphic Registration: A Demons-Based Approach , 2008, MICCAI.

[2]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  The optimal template effect in hippocampus studies of diseased populations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[3]  Yi Ma,et al.  The Augmented Lagrange Multiplier Method for Exact Recovery of Corrupted Low-Rank Matrices , 2010, Journal of structural biology.

[4]  Yi Ma,et al.  Robust principal component analysis? , 2009, JACM.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Identifying Global Anatomical Differences: Deformation-Based Morphometry , 1998, NeuroImage.

[6]  Gary E. Christensen,et al.  Consistent image registration , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Pablo A. Parrilo,et al.  Rank-Sparsity Incoherence for Matrix Decomposition , 2009, SIAM J. Optim..

[8]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  John Wright,et al.  Robust Principal Component Analysis: Exact Recovery of Corrupted Low-Rank Matrices via Convex Optimization , 2009, NIPS.

[10]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  A Log-Euclidean Framework for Statistics on Diffeomorphisms , 2006, MICCAI.

[11]  Ben Taskar,et al.  Posterior vs Parameter Sparsity in Latent Variable Models , 2009, NIPS.

[12]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Unbiased diffeomorphic atlas construction for computational anatomy , 2004, NeuroImage.

[13]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Rank minimization and applications in system theory , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[14]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Multivariate Statistics of the Jacobian Matrices in Tensor Based Morphometry and Their Application to HIV/AIDS , 2006, MICCAI.

[15]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  A Singular Value Thresholding Algorithm for Matrix Completion , 2008, SIAM J. Optim..

[16]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Large Deformation Diffeomorphism and Momentum Based Hippocampal Shape Discrimination in Dementia of the Alzheimer type , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Terence Tao,et al.  The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when P is much larger than n , 2005, math/0506081.

[18]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Image-driven population analysis through mixture modeling , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[19]  John Wright,et al.  Robust Principal Component Analysis: Exact Recovery of Corrupted Low-Rank Matrices via Convex Optimization , 2009, NIPS.

[20]  Jean Meunier,et al.  Average Brain Models: A Convergence Study , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[21]  A. Ng Feature selection, L1 vs. L2 regularization, and rotational invariance , 2004, Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Identifying global anatomical differences: Deformation‐based morphometry , 1998 .