Relative Risk Perception for Terrorism: Implications for Preparedness and Risk Communication

Terrorism presents a significant risk that is often approached at public policy, infrastructure, or emergency management level. Public perceptions of the likelihood of terrorist events, and how this may relate to individual preparedness, are not always extensively examined. The tendency to think that negative events are less likely to happen to oneself than to the average person is known as optimism bias. Optimism bias is relevant to perceptions of terrorism, because it is thought to be related to a reduction in precaution use. Using an online survey of 164 participants, this study aimed to determine whether Sydney residents thought they had a lower likelihood of experiencing terrorist events than other Australians. Significant optimism bias was observed for witnessing terrorist events, but not for personally experiencing terrorist events. In addition, Sydney residents tended to think that terrorist attacks were more likely to occur in Sydney than another major Australian city in the next five years. At the same time, household and workplace preparedness for terrorism was quite low, as was awareness of emergency strategies in the central business district. Perceptions of high likelihood of terrorism happening in one's own city, yet low preparedness present a challenge for risk communication and emergency management strategies. The diversity of possible terrorist targets, and the simple plans that can moderate the effects of a disaster may need to be emphasized in future anti-terrorism initiatives.

[1]  T. Rebmann,et al.  Occupational physician perceptions of bioterrorism. , 2005, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[2]  John-Paul Mulilis,et al.  The Effect of a Swarm of Local Tornados on Tornado Preparedness: A Quasi‐Comparable Cohort Investigation1 , 2003 .

[3]  Stanislav V. Kasl,et al.  Selected Psychosocial Models and Correlates of Individual Health‐Related Behaviors , 1977, Medical care.

[4]  P. Harris,et al.  Give ‘Em Enough Rope: Perception of Health and Safety Risks in Bungee Jumpers , 1996 .

[5]  Neal J. Roese,et al.  Twenty years of bogus pipeline research : a critical review and meta-analysis , 1993 .

[6]  D M DeJoy,et al.  The optimism bias and traffic accident risk perception. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Peter R. Harris,et al.  Sufficient grounds for optimism? The relationship between perceived controllability and optimistic bias , 1996 .

[8]  W. Klein,et al.  Unrealistic Optimism: Present and Future , 1996 .

[9]  Louise Lemyre,et al.  Terrorism threats and preparedness in Canada: the perspective of the Canadian public. , 2007, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[10]  Carlo Caponecchia,et al.  It Won't Happen to Me: An Investigation of Optimism Bias in Occupational Health and Safety , 2010 .

[11]  C. T. Salmon,et al.  Optimistic Bias and Perceptions of Bioterrorism in Michigan Corporate Spokespersons, Fall 2001 , 2003, Journal of health communication.

[12]  L. Sjöberg.  Editorial: Asking questions about risk and worry: dilemmas of the pollsters , 2004 .

[13]  C Peterson,et al.  The future of optimism. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[14]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  Consequences matter, ‘risk’ is marginal , 2000 .

[15]  Jennifer E. C. Lee,et al.  A Social‐Cognitive Perspective of Terrorism Risk Perception and Individual Response in Canada , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  C. Carver,et al.  Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[17]  Jennifer E. C. Lee,et al.  Qualitative analysis of cognitive and contextual determinants of Canadians’ individual response to terrorism , 2009 .

[18]  John McClure,et al.  Optimistic bias in relation to preparedness for earthquakes , 2005 .

[19]  C. Wold,et al.  Differences in individual-level terrorism preparedness in Los Angeles County. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  S. Kaplowitz,et al.  Terrorism Risk Perceptions and Proximity to Primary Terrorist Targets: How Close is Too Close? , 2008 .

[21]  N. Weinstein.  Unrealistic optimism about future life events , 1980 .

[22]  M. Helweg-Larsen.  (The Lack of) Optimistic Biases in Response to the 1994 Northridge Earthquake: The Role of Personal Experience , 1999 .

[23]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Reducing unrealistic optimism about illness susceptibility. , 1983 .

[24]  R. F. Soames Job,et al.  OPTIMISM BIAS ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION: THE ROLE OF THE RANGE OF IMPACT OF PRECAUTIONS , 2001 .

[25]  Martin Loosemore,et al.  Terrorism prevention, preparedness, and response in built facilities , 2006 .

[26]  M. Birnbaum.  Human research and data collection via the internet. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Judged Terror Risk and Proximity to the World Trade Center , 2003 .

[28]  D. Krewski,et al.  Public Perception of Terrorism Threats and Related Information Sources in Canada: Implications for the Management of Terrorism Risks , 2006 .