Selecting projects in a portfolio using risk and ranking

There are three dimensions in project management: time, cost and performance. Risk is a characteristic related to the previous dimensions and their relationships. A risk equation is proposed based on the nature of the uncertainty associated to each dimension as well as the relationship between the uncertainties. A ranking equation that is able to prioritise projects is proposed and discussed. The problem solved here is which projects to select in a given portfolio of projects. The model is implemented in a group decision support system (GDSS) which can guide decisionmakers in their decision process. However, the system is not intended as a substitution of the decisionmaker task, but merely as an aid. The methodology used is analysis of the equations proposed and trial and error based on examples. This paper’s main contribution is the risk equation and the ranking equation. There are three dimensions in project management: time, cost and performance. Risk is a characteristic related to the previous dimensions and their relationships. A risk equation is proposed based on the nature of the uncertainty associated to each dimension as well as the relationship between the uncertainties. A ranking equation that is able to prioritise projects is proposed and discussed. The problem solved here is which projects to select in a given portfolio of projects. The model is implemented in a group decision support system (GDSS) which can guide decisionmakers in their decision process. However, the system is not intended as a substitution of the decisionmaker task, but merely as an aid. The methodology used is analysis of the equations proposed and trial and error based on examples. This paper’s main contribution is the risk equation and the ranking equation. There are three dimensions in project management: time, cost and performance. Risk is a characteristic related to the previous dimensions and their relationships. A risk equation is proposed based on the nature of the uncertainty associated to each dimension as well as the relationship between the uncertainties. A ranking equation that is able to prioritise projects is proposed and discussed. The problem solved here is which projects to select in a given portfolio of projects. The model is implemented in a group decision support system (GDSS) which can guide decisionmakers in their decision process. However, the system is not intended as a substitution of the decisionmaker task, but merely as an aid. The methodology used is analysis of the equations proposed and trial and error based on examples. This paper’s main contribution is the risk equation and the ranking equation. There are three dimensions in project management: time, cost and performance. Risk is a characteristic related to the previous dimensions and their relationships. A risk equation is proposed based on the nature of the uncertainty associated to each dimension as well as the relationship between the uncertainties. A ranking equation that is able to prioritise projects is proposed and discussed. The problem solved here is which projects to select in a given portfolio of projects. The model is implemented in a group decision support system (GDSS) which can guide decisionmakers in their decision process. However, the system is not intended as a substitution of the decisionmaker task, but merely as an aid. The methodology used is analysis of the equations proposed and trial and error based on examples. This paper’s main contribution is the risk equation and the ranking equation.

[1]  T. L. Saaty.  A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[2]  Ray Dawson,et al.  Practical proposals for managing uncertainty and risk in project planning , 1998 .

[3]  Fereidoun Ghasemzadeh,et al.  A zero-one model for project portfolio selection and scheduling , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  Sipke Wadman,et al.  Project and portfolio planning cycle: Project-based management for the multiproject challenge , 1994 .

[5]  George E. Baram,et al.  Concurrent Delays—What Are They and How to Deal With Them? , 2000 .

[6]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Project time risk analysis through simulation , 2001 .

[7]  Luís Valadares Tavares,et al.  On the optimal management of project risk , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Daniel E. Geer,et al.  Risk Aversion , 2012, IEEE Secur. Priv..

[9]  Norman P. Archer,et al.  A decision support system for project portfolio selection , 2007 .

[10]  Frank Lefley,et al.  Approaches to risk and uncertainty in the appraisal of new technology capital projects , 1997 .

[11]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Project Management: A Managerial Approach , 1989 .

[12]  Antony Powell,et al.  Strategies for lifecycle concurrency and iteration - A system dynamics approach , 1999, J. Syst. Softw..

[13]  Jonathan H. Klein,et al.  Modelling Risk Trade-Off , 1993 .

[14]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Measuring the Effectiveness of Overlapping Development Activities , 1999 .

[15]  Fereidoun Ghasemzadeh,et al.  An integrated framework for project portfolio selection , 1999 .

[16]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Planning Concurrency and Managing Iteration in Projects , 2001 .