Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention

Recent research has demonstrated a striking role for intertrial priming in visual search. When searching for a discrepant target, repetition of the target feature speeds search, an effect known as Priming of Pop-out (PoP). In two experiments involving color singletons, we identified two independent components of PoP, target activation and distractor inhibition. Each component was reflected by two measures, a repetition benefit and a switching cost, that were highly correlated. Large individual differences on each component were observed and persisted when test and retest were separated by one week. The results suggest that PoP may be a reliable tool for assessing individual differences on target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention.

[1]  E. Fox,et al.  Attentional bias in anxiety: A defective inhibition hypothesis , 1994 .

[2]  H. Pashler,et al.  Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Satoru Suzuki,et al.  Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and “retrieval” , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of popout: II. Role of position , 1996 .

[5]  H J Müller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  J. Nigg.  On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Yves Bestgen,et al.  Is negative priming a reliable measure for studying individual differences in inhibition , 2000 .

[10]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[12]  G. Lautenschlager,et al.  Mediators of long-term memory performance across the life span. , 1996, Psychology and aging.

[13]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Priming in Macaque Frontal Cortex during Popout Visual Search: Feature-Based Facilitation and Location-Based Inhibition of Return , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Determinants of negative priming. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection , 2000 .

[16]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[17]  A. Miyake,et al.  The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  S. Tipper,et al.  Impaired distractor inhibition in patients with schizophrenia on a negative priming task , 2002, Psychological Medicine.

[20]  A. Beech,et al.  Reduced cognitive inhibition in obsessive-compulsive disorder. , 1993, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[21]  W. Neill.  Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. , 1997 .

[22]  E. Macaluso,et al.  Neural basis for priming of pop-out during visual search revealed with fMRI. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[24]  H. Egeth,et al.  The role of within-dimension singleton priming in visual search. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  K. Nakayama,et al.  On the Functional Role of Implicit Visual Memory for the Adaptive Deployment of Attention Across Scenes , 2000 .

[26]  S. Tipper.  The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[27]  A. Treisman,et al.  Visual memory for novel shapes: implicit coding without attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  H. Koshino,et al.  Activation and inhibition of stimulus features in conjunction search , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Where Memory Meets Attention: Neural Substrates of Negative Priming , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  A. Hillstrom.  Repetition effects in visual search , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Attention and Priming: Inhibitory and Facilitatory Effects of Ignored Primes , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Emotional priming of pop-out in visual search. , 2008, Emotion.

[33]  E. Fox.  Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  H. Müller,et al.  Cross-trial priming in visual search for singleton conjunction targets: Role of repeated target and distractor features , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  A E Seiffert,et al.  Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. , 1998, Psychological review.