Metabolomics and the Detection of Unintended Effects in Genetically Modified Crops

The chapter describes current procedures for the safety assessment of genetically modified crops and foods. The concepts of substantial equivalence, the conventional comparator, and intended and unintended effects are introduced. Most published examples of substantial equivalence testing deal with crops that have been modified for insect resistance or herbicide tolerance. A standard procedure has developed based on broadly similar field trial designs, sampling schemes and targeted analyses of a consensus set of compounds for each crop. The main characteristics of the procedure are summarised with reference to published analyses of this type of crop and different statistical approaches to judging ‘equivalence’ are discussed.

[1]  R. Herman,et al.  Compositional assessment of event DAS-59122-7 maize using substantial equivalence. , 2007, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  Yves Gibon,et al.  GMD@CSB.DB: the Golm Metabolome Database , 2005, Bioinform..

[3]  F. Mellon,et al.  Dihydrocaffeoyl polyamines (kukoamine and allies) in potato (Solanum tuberosum) tubers detected during metabolite profiling. , 2005, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[4]  G. Le Gall,et al.  Metabolite profiling of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) using 1H NMR spectroscopy as a tool to detect potential unintended effects following a genetic modification. , 2003, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[5]  M. Defernez,et al.  NMR and HPLC-UV profiling of potatoes with genetic modifications to metabolic pathways. , 2004, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[6]  E. K. Kemsley,et al.  Multivariate techniques and their application in nutrition: a metabolomics case study , 2007, British Journal of Nutrition.

[7]  A. Fernie,et al.  Metabolic profiling and biochemical phenotyping of plant systems , 2002, Plant Cell Reports.

[8]  M. Sjöström,et al.  Design of experiments: an efficient strategy to identify factors influencing extraction and derivatization of Arabidopsis thaliana samples in metabolomic studies with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. , 2004, Analytical biochemistry.

[9]  A. Segre,et al.  Strong increase of foliar inulin occurs in transgenic lettuce plants (Lactuca sativa L.) overexpressing the Asparagine Synthetase A gene from Escherichia coli. , 2007, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[10]  Serge Rudaz,et al.  UPLC-TOF-MS for plant metabolomics: a sequential approach for wound marker analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[11]  M. Roberfroid,et al.  Functional food properties of non-digestible oligosaccharides: a consensus report from the ENDO project (DGXII AIRII-CT94-1095) , 1999, British Journal of Nutrition.

[12]  Søren Bak,et al.  Metabolic engineering of dhurrin in transgenic Arabidopsis plants with marginal inadvertent effects on the metabolome and transcriptome. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Oliver Fiehn,et al.  Quality control for plant metabolomics: reporting MSI-compliant studies. , 2008, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[14]  H. Li,et al.  Comparison of nutritional quality between Chinese indica rice with sck and cry1Ac genes and its nontransgenic counterpart. , 2007, Journal of food science.

[15]  M. Beckmann,et al.  Detecting a difference – assessing generalisability when modelling metabolome fingerprint data in longer term studies of genetically modified plants , 2007, Metabolomics.

[16]  Mariusz Kowalczyk,et al.  Biosynthesis, conjugation, catabolism and homeostasis of indole-3-acetic acid in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2002, Plant Molecular Biology.

[17]  O. Fiehn.  Metabolomics – the link between genotypes and phenotypes , 2004, Plant Molecular Biology.

[18]  Erik Millstone,et al.  Beyond ‘substantial equivalence’ , 1999, Nature.

[19]  R. Dobert,et al.  Glyphosate-tolerant soybeans remain compositionally equivalent to conventional soybeans (Glycine max L.) during three years of field testing. , 2005, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[20]  J. Keurentjes,et al.  Untargeted large-scale plant metabolomics using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[21]  A. Fernie,et al.  Metabolite profiling: from diagnostics to systems biology , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[22]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Comparative safety assessment of plant-derived foods. , 2008, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[23]  D. Schomburg,et al.  GC–MS libraries for the rapid identification of metabolites in complex biological samples , 2005, FEBS letters.

[24]  J. Astwood,et al.  Composition of grain and forage from corn rootworm-protected corn event MON 863 is equivalent to that of conventional corn (Zea mays l.). , 2004, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[25]  Sarah Oehlschlager,et al.  NMR profiling of transgenic peas. , 2004, Plant biotechnology journal.

[26]  R. Dixon.  Engineering of plant natural product pathways. , 2005, Current opinion in plant biology.

[27]  S. Kanaya,et al.  Summary , 1940, Intellectual Property in the Conflict of Laws.

[28]  S. Verrall,et al.  Potato metabolomics by GC–MS: what are the limiting factors? , 2007, Metabolomics.

[29]  M. Galceran,et al.  Modern developments in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based environmental analysis. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[30]  C. Manetti,et al.  A metabonomic study of transgenic maize (Zea mays) seeds revealed variations in osmolytes and branched amino acids. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[31]  M. Taylor,et al.  Assessing the potential for unintended effects in genetically modified potatoes perturbed in metabolic and developmental processes. Targeted analysis of key nutrients and anti-nutrients , 2006, Transgenic Research.

[32]  Joachim Schiemann,et al.  Guidance document of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed: (Question No EFSA-Q-2003-005) , 2004 .

[33]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. , 2008, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[34]  K. Engel,et al.  Metabolite profiling--a fractionation method for analysis of major and minor compounds in rice grains , 2002 .

[35]  A G Renwick.  Risk characterisation of chemicals in food. , 2004, Toxicology letters.

[36]  I. Colquhoun.  Use of NMR for metabolic profiling in plant systems , 2007 .

[37]  M. Orešič,et al.  Data processing for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[38]  R. Fuchs,et al.  Compositional analysis of tubers from insect and virus resistant potato plants. , 2000, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[39]  I Kimber,et al.  Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops. , 2004, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[40]  S. Kanaya,et al.  Clarification of Pathway-Specific Inhibition by Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance/Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolic Phenotyping Studies1[W] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[41]  E J Kok,et al.  Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops. , 2004, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[42]  O. Fiehn,et al.  Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  M. Bizzarri,et al.  NMR-based metabonomic study of transgenic maize. , 2004, Phytochemistry.

[44]  A. Lovegrove,et al.  A metabolomic study of substantial equivalence of field-grown genetically modified wheat. , 2006, Plant biotechnology journal.

[45]  U. Roessner,et al.  The impact of constitutive heterologous expression of a moss Na+ transporter on the metabolomes of rice and barley , 2007, Metabolomics.

[46]  Fumio Matsuda,et al.  High-level tryptophan accumulation in seeds of transgenic rice and its limited effects on agronomic traits and seed metabolite profile. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[47]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis , 2007, Metabolomics.

[48]  L. Tagliani,et al.  Compositional equivalency of Cry1F corn event TC6275 and conventional corn (Zea mays L.). , 2004, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[49]  Elaine Holmes,et al.  The assessment of plant metabolite profiles by NMR-based methodologies. , 2006, Planta medica.

[50]  A. Fernie,et al.  Gas chromatography mass spectrometry–based metabolite profiling in plants , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[51]  G. Harrigan,et al.  Chemical composition of glyphosate-tolerant soybean 40-3-2 grown in Europe remains equivalent with that of conventional soybean (Glycine max L.). , 2007, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[52]  A. Segre,et al.  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy-Based Metabolite Profiling of Transgenic Tomato Fruit Engineered to Accumulate Spermidine and Spermine Reveals Enhanced Anabolic and Nitrogen-Carbon Interactions1[W][OA] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[53]  H. Steiner,et al.  Development of the International Life Sciences Institute Crop Composition Database , 2004 .

[54]  Giselle Limentani,et al.  Beyond the t-test: statistical equivalence testing. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[55]  L. Hothorn,et al.  Statistical analysis used in the nutritional assessment of novel food using the proof of safety. , 2006, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[56]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Hierarchical metabolomics demonstrates substantial compositional similarity between genetically modified and conventional potato crops. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  N. Kruger,et al.  Metabolite fingerprinting and profiling in plants using NMR. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[58]  L. Holden,et al.  Glyphosate-tolerant corn: the composition and feeding value of grain from glyphosate-tolerant corn is equivalent to that of conventional corn (Zea mays L.). , 2000, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[59]  J. Astwood,et al.  The composition of grain and forage from glyphosate tolerant wheat MON 71800 is equivalent to that of conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). , 2004, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[60]  H. Miyagawa,et al.  Characterization of tryptophan-overproducing potato transgenic for a mutant rice anthranilate synthase α-subunit gene (OASA1D) , 2005, Planta.

[61]  Oliver Fiehn,et al.  Metabolomic database annotations via query of elemental compositions: Mass accuracy is insufficient even at less than 1 ppm , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[62]  R. Shillito,et al.  Rice (Oryza sativa L.) containing the bar gene is compositionally equivalent to the nontransgenic counterpart. , 2005, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[63]  D. Goodenowe,et al.  Nontargeted metabolome analysis by use of Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Mass Spectrometry. , 2002, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[64]  R. Sidhu,et al.  Comparison of the nutritional profile of glyphosate-tolerant corn event NK603 with that of conventional corn (Zea mays L.). , 2002, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[65]  M. Rychlik,et al.  Safety testing of GM-rice expressing PHA-E lectin using a new animal test design. , 2007, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.