Clustering of Auto Supplier Plants in the U.S.: GMM Spatial Logit for Large Samples

A linearized version of Pinkse and Slade’s (1998) spatial probit estimator is used to account for the tendency of auto supplier plants to cluster together. By reducing estimation to two steps – standard probit or logit followed by two-stage least squares – linearization produces a model that can be estimated using large datasets. Our results imply significant clustering among older plants. Supplier plants are more likely to be in counties that are near assembly plants, that include interstate highways, and that are near other counties with supplier plants. New plants show no additional tendency toward clustering beyond that shown by older plants.

[1]  Jan K. Brueckner,et al.  Testing for Strategic Interaction Among Local Governments: The Case of Growth Controls , 1998 .

[2]  Douglas P. Woodward Locational Determinants of Japanese Manufacturing Start-Ups in the United States , 1992 .

[3]  Federico Revelli,et al.  Reaction or interaction? Spatial process identification in multi-tiered government structures , 2003 .

[4]  Federico Revelli,et al.  In Search for Yardstick Competition: Property Tax Rates and Electoral Behavior in Italian Cities , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  Luz A. Saavedra,et al.  A Model of Welfare Competition with Evidence from AFDC , 2000 .

[6]  Richard Florida,et al.  Agglomeration and Industrial Location: An Econometric Analysis of Japanese-Affiliated Manufacturing Establishments in Automotive-Related Industries , 1994 .

[7]  Jan K. Brueckner,et al.  Do Local Governments Engage in Strategic Property-Tax Competition? , 2000 .

[8]  Gadi Barlevy,et al.  Characterizations in a Random Record Model with a Non-Identically Distributed Initial Record , 2005 .

[9]  Joris Pinkse,et al.  Contracting in space: An application of spatial statistics to discrete-choice models , 1998 .

[10]  J. LeSage Spatial Econometrics , 1998 .

[11]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  J. Pinkse,et al.  The determinants of municipal tax rates in British Columbia , 2000 .

[13]  Thomas H. Klier Challenges to the U.S. auto industry , 2004 .

[14]  Federico Revelli,et al.  In search of yardstick competition: a spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting , 2003 .

[15]  Harvey S. Rosen,et al.  Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states , 1993 .

[16]  H. Kelejian,et al.  A Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances , 1998 .

[17]  A. Case Neighborhood influence and technological change , 1992 .

[18]  Where the Headquarters are - Evidence from Large Public Companies 1990-2000 , 2003 .

[19]  Daniel L. Millimet,et al.  Strategic Interaction and the Determination of Environmental Policy across U.S. States , 2002 .

[20]  D. McMillen PROBIT WITH SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION , 1992 .