Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants.

Stress analysis of the cement fixation of orthopaedic implants to bone is frequently carried out using finite element analysis. However the stress distribution in the cement layer is usually intricate, and it is difficult to report it in a way that facilitates comparison of implants for pre-clinical testing. To study this problem, and make recommendations for stress reporting, a finite element analysis of a hip prosthesis implanted into a synthetic composite femur is developed. Three cases are analyzed: a fully bonded implant, a debonded implant, and a debonded implant where the cement is removed distal to the stem tip. In addition to peak stresses, and contour and vector plots, a stressed volume and probability-of-failure analysis is reported. It is predicted that the peak stress is highest for the debonded stem, and that removal of the distal cement more than halves this peak stress. This would suggest that omission of the distal cement is good for polished prostheses (as practiced for the Exeter design). However, if the percentage of cement stressed above a certain threshold (say 3 MPa) is considered, then the removal of distal cement is shown to be disadvantageous because a higher volume of cement is stressed to above the threshold. Vector plots clearly demonstrate the different load transfer for bonded and debonded prostheses: A bonded stem generates maximum tensile stresses in the longitudinal direction, whereas a debonded stem generates most tensile stresses in the hoop direction, except near the tip where tensile longitudinal stresses occur due to subsidence of the stem. Removal of the cement distal to the tip allows greater subsidence but alleviates these large stresses at the tip, albeit at the expense of increased hoop stresses throughout the mantle. It is concluded that a thorough analysis of cemented implants should not report peak stress, which can be misleading, but rather stressed volume, and that vector plots should be reported if a precise analysis of the load transfer mechanism is required.

[1]  N Verdonschot,et al.  The effects of cement-stem debonding in THA on the long-term failure probability of cement. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  M. J. Fagan,et al.  Material selection in the design of the femoral component of cemented total hip replacements , 1986 .

[3]  B P McNamara,et al.  Relationship between bone-prosthesis bonding and load transfer in total hip reconstruction. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Nico Verdonschot,et al.  Sensitivity of failure criteria of cemented total hip replacements to finite element mesh density , 1998 .

[5]  A. Cappello,et al.  Mechanical validation of whole bone composite tibia models. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Mechanical effects of stem cement interface characteristics in total hip replacement. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  R. Huiskes.  The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  Hwj Rik Huiskes,et al.  Strains in composite hip joint reconstructions obtained through FEA and experiments correspond closely , 2000 .

[10]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Microdamage accumulation in the cement layer of hip replacements under flexural loading. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  T P Harrigan,et al.  A finite element study of the initiation of failure of fixation in cemented femoral total hip components , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Finite element models in tissue mechanics and orthopaedic implant design. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  M.S.J. Hashmi,et al.  Material selection in the design of the femoral component of cemented total hip replacement , 2002 .

[14]  C. Ford,et al.  Applications of Bone Mechanics , 2001 .

[15]  R Huiskes,et al.  Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  K. McPherson,et al.  Pain levels after total hip replacement: their use as endpoints for survival analysis. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  E. Schneider,et al.  Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  H H Vichnin,et al.  Stress analysis and failure prediction in the proximal femur before and after total hip replacement. , 1986, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[19]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Patrick J. Prendergast,et al.  On the magnitude and variability of the fatigue strength of acrylic bone cement , 2000 .

[21]  W H Harris,et al.  Is It Advantageous to Strengthen the Cement‐Metal Interface and Use a Collar for Cemented Femoral Components of Total Hip Replacements? , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  D. Bartel,et al.  Cemented Femoral Stem Performance: Effects of Proximal Bonding, Geometry, and Neck Length , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.