Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score

Abstract Matched sampling is a method for selecting units from a large reservoir of potential controls to produce a control group of modest size that is similar to a treated group with respect to the distribution of observed covariates. We illustrate the use of multivariate matching methods in an observational study of the effects of prenatal exposure to barbiturates on subsequent psychological development. A key idea is the use of the propensity score as a distinct matching variable.

[1]  W. G. Cochran.  The Planning of Observational Studies of Human Populations , 1965 .

[2]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  The Computerized Construction of a Matched Sample , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  David R. Cox.  The analysis of binary data , 1970 .

[4]  A. Dempster.  An overview of multivariate data analysis , 1971 .

[5]  S. Mednick,et al.  Perinatal conditions and infant development in children with schizophrenic parents. , 1982, Social biology.

[6]  D. Cox.  The Analysis of Multivariate Binary Data , 1972 .

[7]  A. Dempster.  Aspects of the Multinomial Logit Model , 1973 .

[8]  D. Rubin.  Matched Sampling for Causal Effects: The Use of Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Remove Bias in Observational Studies , 1973 .

[9]  D. Rubin.  Matched Sampling for Causal Effects: Matching to Remove Bias in Observational Studies , 1973 .

[10]  W. G. Cochran,et al.  Controlling Bias in Observational Studies: A Review. , 1974 .

[11]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Multivariate matching methods that are equal percent bias reducing , 1974 .

[12]  M. Sheridan.  Babies: Human Development During the First Year, Bengt Zachan-Christiansen, E.M. Ross. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, Sussex (1975), 295, £10.75 , 1976 .

[13]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  MULTIVARIATE MATCHING METHODS THAT ARE EQUAL PERCENT BIAS REDUCING, I: SOME EXAMPLES , 1974 .

[14]  O S Miettinen,et al.  Stratification by a multivariate confounder score. , 1976, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  R. G. Carpenter,et al.  Matching when covariables are normally distributed , 1977 .

[16]  An Overview of Multivariate Analysis , 1978 .

[17]  D. Rubin,et al.  Using Multivariate Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Control Bias in Observational Studies , 1978 .

[18]  D. Rubin.  Bias Reduction Using Mahalanobis-Metric Matching , 1980 .

[19]  W. Raynor,et al.  Caliper pair-matching on a continuous variable in case-control studies , 1983 .

[20]  D. Rubin,et al.  Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Covariate in an Observational Study with Binary Outcome , 1983 .

[21]  An Evaluation of Model-Dependent and Probability-Sampling Inferences in Sample Surveys: Comment , 1983 .

[22]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[23]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .

[24]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Comment: Assessing the Fit of Logistic Regressions Using the Implied Discriminant Analysis , 1984 .

[25]  P. Rosenbaum.  The Consequences of Adjustment for a Concomitant Variable that Has Been Affected by the Treatment , 1984 .

[26]  P. Rosenbaum.  From Association to Causation in Observational Studies: The Role of Tests of Strongly Ignorable Treatment Assignment , 1984 .

[27]  P. Rosenbaum.  Conditional Permutation Tests and the Propensity Score in Observational Studies , 1984 .

[28]  D. Rubin,et al.  The Bias Due to Incomplete Matching , 1985 .