Variation in the Effect of Communities That Care on Community Adoption of a Scientific Approach to Prevention

Tested and effective approaches are available to prevent mental, emotional, and behavioral problems in youth, but such approaches are underused. Communities That Care (CTC) is a coalition-based strategy that aims to increase the use of tested and effective programs by combining the use of scientific evidence and stakeholder consensus to support the community adoption of a scientific approach to preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral problems in youth. A community-randomized trial of CTC was conducted with a sample of 24 communities, with the communities matched in pairs and assigned randomly to a control or an intervention condition. The findings demonstrate that CTC significantly increases the community-wide adoption of a science-based approach to prevention. Using a meta-analysis technique, this study shows that despite uniformly high fidelity implementation of CTC in intervention communities, the effect of CTC on the adoption of a scientific approach to prevention varies significantly across the 12 community pairs. Understanding the extent of variation in the effect of CTC on adopting a science-based approach to prevention lays a foundation for identifying aspects of coalition structure, functioning, or capacity that not only may help explain variation in adoption, but may in turn be targeted to strengthen the effect of CTC on the adoption of a science-based approach to prevention within communities.

[1]  Valerie B. Shapiro,et al.  Prevention System Mediation of Communities That Care Effects on Youth Outcomes , 2014, Prevention Science.

[2]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2013 .

[3]  R. Abbott,et al.  The Application of Meta-analysis within a Matched-pair Randomized Control Trial: An Illustration Testing the Effects of Communities That Care on Delinquent Behavior , 2013, Prevention Science.

[4]  P. Layde,et al.  A model to translate evidence-based interventions into community practice. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[5]  J. Higgins.  Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[6]  S. Ennett,et al.  The Prevalence of Evidence-based Drug Use Prevention Curricula in U.S. Middle Schools in 2008 , 2011, Prevention Science.

[7]  Valerie B. Shapiro,et al.  Disseminating Effective Community Prevention Practices: Opportunities for Social Work Education , 2010, Research on social work practice.

[8]  J David Hawkins,et al.  Implementation of the Communities That Care Prevention System by Coalitions in the Community Youth Development Study. , 2010, Journal of community psychology.

[9]  L. Hedges.  Effect sizes in nested designs , 2009 .

[10]  Michael W. Arthur,et al.  Translational Research in Action: Implementation of the Communities That Care Prevention System in 12 Communities. , 2009, Journal of community psychology.

[11]  T. Boat,et al.  Preventing Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders Among Young People: Progress and Possibilities , 2009 .

[12]  Robert D. Abbott,et al.  Design and Analysis of the Community Youth Development Study Longitudinal Cohort Sample , 2009, Evaluation review.

[13]  S. Ennett,et al.  The Prevalence of Evidence-Based Drug Use Prevention Curricula in U.S. Middle Schools in 2005 , 2009, Prevention Science.

[14]  Jennifer Duffy,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Prevention Research and Practice: The Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation , 2008, American journal of community psychology.

[15]  Robert D. Abbott,et al.  Testing Communities That Care: The Rationale, Design and Behavioral Baseline Equivalence of the Community Youth Development Study , 2008, Prevention Science.

[16]  Michael W. Arthur,et al.  Installing the communities that care prevention system: implementation progress and fidelity in a randomized controlled trial , 2008 .

[17]  Jacob Z. Hess,et al.  A Qualitative Study of the Activities and Outcomes of Domestic Violence Coordinating Councils , 2008, American journal of community psychology.

[18]  C. Helfrich,et al.  Introduction and conceptual model for utilization of prevention research. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[19]  R. Abbott,et al.  Effects of Communities That Care on Prevention Services Systems: Findings From the Community Youth Development Study at 1.5 Years , 2007, Prevention Science.

[20]  Michael W. Arthur,et al.  Measuring risk and protection in communities using the Communities That Care Youth Survey. , 2007, Evaluation and program planning.

[21]  Knowlton W. Johnson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Direct and Mediating Effects of Community Coalitions That Implemented Science-Based Substance Abuse Prevention Interventions , 2007, Substance use & misuse.

[22]  W. Compton,et al.  Mental Health and Substance Abuse Innovations: Issues of Diffusion and Adoption , 2006 .

[23]  Michael W. Arthur,et al.  Mobilizing Communities To Reduce Risk for Drug Abuse: A Comparison of Two Strategies , 2006 .

[24]  Amy E. Chadwick,et al.  Community capacity building in CDC's Community Coalition Partnership Programs for the Prevention of Teen Pregnancy. , 2005, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[25]  Michael W. Arthur,et al.  Measurement Properties of the Communities That Care® Youth Survey Across Demographic Groups , 2005 .

[26]  M. Holmila.  Helping Adolescents At Risk. Prevention of Multiple Problem Behaviors , 2005 .

[27]  B. Leadbeater,et al.  Resilience in children, families, and communities: Linking context to practice and policy. , 2005 .

[28]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Charles Kadushin,et al.  Fighting back against substance abuse: are community coalitions winning? , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[30]  Bill Berkowitz.  Studying the Outcomes of Community-Based Coalitions , 2001, American journal of community psychology.

[31]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[32]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Predicting intermediate outcomes for prevention coalitions: a developmental perspective , 2000 .

[33]  D. Gavaghan,et al.  An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data , 2000, Pain.

[34]  S. Fawcett,et al.  A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. , 2000, Annual review of public health.

[35]  R. Yin,et al.  Outcomes from CSAP's community partnership program: Findings from the national cross-site evaluation☆ , 1997 .

[36]  D. Chavis,et al.  Communities That Care: Action for Drug Abuse Prevention , 1994 .

[37]  R. Kessler,et al.  Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. , 1994, Archives of general psychiatry.

[38]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. Confirmation from meta-analysis. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[39]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach. , 1993, Health education research.

[40]  R M Goodman,et al.  Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. , 1993, Health education research.

[41]  S G West,et al.  The Science of Prevention: A Conceptual Framework and Some Directions for a National Research Program , 1993 .

[42]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[43]  I. Weiner.  Child and Adolescent Psychopathology , 1982 .

[44]  L. Hedges.  Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect size and Related Estimators , 1981 .

[45]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .