Developmental differences in schema dependency for temporally ordered story events

This research project was undertaken to investigate whether temporally ordered story events would be recalled in logical sequence as opposed to presentation order by various ages and under various task conditions. A 24-hour delayed condition was used as well as immediate recall. Six-year-olds, 8-year-olds, and adults were asked to recall four narratives. Instructions given were either vague or specifically required subjects to recall events exactly as they had been presented. Following the delayed recall, a picture-sequencing task was adminstered to assess whether picture cues would enable subjects to demonstrate awareness of input order even though they had reordered events in recall. All subjects reordered more during the delayed recall than during the immediate recall. Age differences (p<0003) occurred in the ability of subjects to demonstrate verbatim memory on the picture-sequencing task. Findings suggest that in contrast to adults, once children have reordered narrative events in memory, they no longer have an alternative verbatim version available. Results also suggest a greater schema dependency in children than in adults in recall tasks.

[1]  J. Piaget.  The Language and Thought of the Child , 1927 .

[2]  R. Watson,et al.  Psychology of the child , 1959 .

[3]  G. Spache,et al.  Good Reading for Poor Readers , 1966 .

[4]  Paul, the hero of the fire , 1969 .

[5]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Psychology of the Child , 1969 .

[6]  D. Sherman,et al.  Review of Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation. , 1970 .

[7]  S. Barrie-Blackley.  Six-year-old children's understanding of sentences adjoined with time adverbs , 1973, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[8]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  The development of memory: knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. , 1975, Advances in child development and behavior.

[9]  Ann L. Brown.  Recognition, Reconstruction, and Recall of Narrative Sequences by Preoperational Children. , 1975 .

[10]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Sandra L. Aivano,et al.  Developmental changes in memory: The effects of processing time and rehearsal instructions☆ , 1977 .

[12]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Technical Report No. 41. , 1977 .

[13]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Summarizing scrambled stories , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[14]  P. Thorndyke.  Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  R. Kail,et al.  Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition , 1977 .

[16]  Linda Baker,et al.  Processing Temporal Relationships in Simple Stories: Effects of Input Sequence. Technical Report No. 84. , 1978 .

[17]  J M Mandler,et al.  Developmental changes in picture recognition. , 1978, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  Mandler JeanM..  A code in the node: The use of a story schema in retrieval , 1978 .

[19]  Nancy L. Stein,et al.  The effects of organization and instructional set on story memory , 1978 .

[20]  Jana M. Mason,et al.  An exploratory study of story structure and age effects on children's ability to sequence stories∗ , 1979 .

[21]  Ray R. Buss.  Development of Children's Use of a Story Schema to Retrieve Information. , 1983 .

[22]  Katherine Nelson,et al.  Effects of script structure on children's story recall. , 1983 .