Coevolving advances in animal flight and aerial robotics

Our understanding of animal flight has inspired the design of new aerial robots with more effective flight capacities through the process of biomimetics and bioinspiration. The aerodynamic origin of the elevated performance of flying animals remains, however, poorly understood. In this themed issue, animal flight research and aerial robot development coalesce to offer a broader perspective on the current advances and future directions in these coevolving fields of research. Together, four reviews summarize and 14 reports contribute to our understanding of low Reynolds number flight. This area of applied aerodynamics research is challenging to dissect due to the complicated flow phenomena that include laminar–turbulent flow transition, laminar separation bubbles, delayed stall and nonlinear vortex dynamics. Our mechanistic understanding of low Reynolds number flight has perhaps been advanced most by the development of dynamically scaled robot models and new specialized wind tunnel facilities: in particular, the tiltable Lund flight tunnel for animal migration research and the recently developed AFAR hypobaric wind tunnel for high-altitude animal flight studies. These world-class facilities are now complemented with a specialized low Reynolds number wind tunnel for studying the effect of turbulence on animal and robot flight in much greater detail than previously possible. This is particular timely, because the study of flight in extremely laminar versus turbulent flow opens a new frontier in our understanding of animal flight. Advancing this new area will offer inspiration for developing more efficient high-altitude aerial robots and removes roadblocks for aerial robots operating in turbulent urban environments.

[1]  Mirko Kovač,et al.  Aerodynamic evaluation of wing shape and wing orientation in four butterfly species using numerical simulations and a low-speed wind tunnel, and its implications for the design of flying micro-robots , 2017, Interface Focus.

[2]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Flies compensate for unilateral wing damage through modular adjustments of wing and body kinematics , 2017, Interface Focus.

[3]  David Lentink,et al.  Nature-inspired flight—beyond the leap , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[4]  G. Spedding,et al.  On the possibility (or lack thereof) of agreement between experiment and computation of flows over wings at moderate Reynolds number , 2017, Interface Focus.

[5]  Pakpong Chirarattananon,et al.  Dynamics and flight control of a flapping-wing robotic insect in the presence of wind gusts , 2017, Interface Focus.

[6]  Robert Dudley,et al.  Biomechanics of aerial righting in wingless nymphal stick insects , 2017, Interface Focus.

[7]  Cameron Tropea,et al.  Reynolds number influence on the formation of vortical structures on a pitching flat plate , 2017, Interface Focus.

[8]  David Lentink,et al.  Touchdown to take-off: at the interface of flight and surface locomotion , 2017, Interface Focus.

[9]  Roi Gurka,et al.  Flow pattern similarities in the near wake of three bird species suggest a common role for unsteady aerodynamic effects in lift generation , 2017, Interface Focus.

[10]  Anders Hedenström,et al.  Wake analysis of drag components in gliding flight of a jackdaw (Corvus monedula) during moult , 2017, Interface Focus.

[11]  M Di Luca,et al.  Bioinspired morphing wings for extended flight envelope and roll control of small drones , 2017, Interface Focus.

[12]  Kevin Knowles,et al.  Petiolate wings: effects on the leading-edge vortex in flapping flight , 2017, Interface Focus.

[13]  N. Rattenborg,et al.  Sleeping on the wing , 2017, Interface Focus.

[14]  Andrew A Biewener,et al.  Rules to fly by: pigeons navigating horizontal obstacles limit steering by selecting gaps most aligned to their flight direction , 2017, Interface Focus.

[15]  S A Combes,et al.  Foraging in an unsteady world: bumblebee flight performance in field-realistic turbulence , 2017, Interface Focus.

[16]  M. Kovač,et al.  Wind and water tunnel testing of a morphing aquatic micro air vehicle , 2017, Interface Focus.

[17]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. , 1999, Science.

[18]  H. Wagner,et al.  Features of owl wings that promote silent flight , 2017, Interface Focus.

[19]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Energetics in robotic flight at small scales , 2017, Interface Focus.

[20]  D. Lentink Bioinspired flight control , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[21]  C. Pennycuick,et al.  A new low-turbulence wind tunnel for bird flight experiments at Lund University, Sweden , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  Sharon M Swartz,et al.  The influence of aspect ratio and stroke pattern on force generation of a bat-inspired membrane wing , 2017, Interface Focus.

[23]  W. Shyy,et al.  Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flyers , 2007 .