Influences on students’ assistive technology use at school: the views of classroom teachers, allied health professionals, students with cerebral palsy and their parents

Abstract Purpose: This study explored how classroom teachers, allied health professionals, students with cerebral palsy, and their parents view high-tech assistive technology service delivery in the classroom. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with six classroom teachers and six parents and their children were conducted. Additionally, two focus groups comprising 10 occupational therapists and six speech pathologists were carried out. Ethical and confidentiality considerations meant that the groups were not matched. Results: Results revealed that it is often untrained staff member who determine students’ educational needs. The participants’ experiences suggested that, particularly in mainstream settings, there is a need for support and guidance from a professional with knowledge of assistive technology who can also take a lead and guide classroom teachers in how to meet students’ needs. Students’ motivation to use the technology was also found to be critical for its successful uptake. Conclusions: The study points to the need for classroom teachers to be given sufficient time and skill development opportunities to enable them to work effectively with assistive technology in the classroom. The participants’ experiences suggest that such opportunities are not generally forthcoming. Only in this way can it be ensured that students with disabilities receive the education that is their right. Implications for Rehabilitation Classroom teachers, allied health professionals, students, parents need ongoing support and opportunities to practise operational, strategic and linguistic skills with the assistive technology equipment. System barriers to the uptake of assistive technology need to be addressed. To address the lack of time available for training, programing and other support activities around assistive technology, dedicated administrative support is crucial. Professional development around the use of the quality low cost ICF-CY checklist is recommended for both school and allied health staff.

[1]  Thomas A. Schwandt,et al.  Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation , 2007 .

[2]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[3]  S. Kvale,et al.  InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing , 1996 .

[4]  L. Bown.  World Education Report 2000. The Right To Education Towards Education For All Throughout Life , 2001 .

[5]  Lynda H. Webb,et al.  A provision framework and data logging tool to aid the prescription of electronic assistive technology , 2002 .

[6]  S. Nochajski.  Collaboration Between Team Members in Inclusive Educational Settings , 2002, Occupational therapy in health care.

[7]  Janice C Light,et al.  General Education Teachers' Experiences with Inclusion of Students who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2003 .

[8]  T. B. Üstün,et al.  Development of ICF Core Sets for patients with chronic conditions. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[9]  J. Ziviani,et al.  Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. , 2004, Occupational therapy international.

[10]  J. Jones,et al.  A description of how three occupational therapists train children in using the scanning access technique , 2004 .

[11]  P. Rosenbaum,et al.  The World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: a model to guide clinical thinking, practice and research in the field of cerebral palsy. , 2004, Seminars in pediatric neurology.

[12]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Multiple Case Study Analysis , 2005 .

[13]  Jodie Copley,et al.  Use of a Team-Based Approach to Assistive Technology Assessment and Planning for Children With Multiple Disabilities: A Pilot Study , 2007, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[14]  Bernard M O'Keefe,et al.  Research priorities in augmentative and alternative communication as identified by people who use AAC and their facilitators , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[15]  H. Hemmingsson,et al.  Students with disabilities participating in mainstream schools: policies that promote and limit teacher and therapist cooperation , 2007 .

[16]  E. Skarakis-Doyle,et al.  School-aged children with SLI: the ICF as a framework for collaborative service delivery. , 2007, Journal of communication disorders.

[17]  Janice C Light,et al.  “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies , 2008, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[18]  P. Rosenbaum,et al.  Assistive devices for children with functional impairments: impact on child and caregiver function , 2008, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[19]  Julie M. McMillan,et al.  Teachers Make it Happen: From Professional Development to Integration of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Technologies in the Classroom , 2008 .

[20]  S. Murchland,et al.  Using assistive technology for schoolwork: the experience of children with physical disabilities , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[21]  J. L. Mory.  Characterizing functional limitations in children using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY) , 2010 .

[22]  M. Law,et al.  Level of motivation in mastering challenging tasks in children with cerebral palsy , 2010, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[23]  S. Balandin,et al.  Where are teachers' voices? A research agenda to enhance the communicative interactions of students with multiple and severe disabilities at school , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation.

[24]  I. Novak,et al.  Cerebral palsy--don't delay. , 2011, Developmental disabilities research reviews.

[25]  M. Granlund,et al.  Using content analysis to link texts on assessment and intervention to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health - version for Children and Youth (ICF-CY). , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[26]  Sandra A. M. Steiner,et al.  Developing the ICF-CY for AAC Profile and Code Set for Children Who Rely on AAC , 2012, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[27]  P. Raghavendra,et al.  School Participation and Social Networks of Children with Complex Communication Needs, Physical Disabilities, and Typically Developing Peers , 2012, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[28]  D. Prasad.  Data Collection Strategies in Mixed Method Research , 2012 .

[29]  A. Williams,et al.  International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF-CY World Health Organization , 2013 .

[30]  T. Falkmer,et al.  Improving computer usage for students with physical disabilities through a collaborative approach: A pilot study , 2013, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.