Peer review: Is Giving Corrective Feedback Better than Receiving it in L2 Writing?☆

Abstract The effect of peer review on L2 writing has already been established. The benefit of peer review to the feedback giver, however, remains to be explored. This quasi-experimental study intends to examine the effect of giving peer corrective feedback on the writing of givers against the effect of receiving it from peers. The study was conducted in an EFL classroom setting with 45 learners of English in three writing classes who were labelled as the “givers”, the “receivers”, and the comparison group. Over four sessions of treatment, the givers reviewed the writing of the receivers with two functions of English articles (a/an as the first mention and the as the anaphoric reference) and simple past tense (regular and irregular) as the features in focus without receiving any comments from others on their writing. The receivers received feedback from peers but were deprived of giving any feedback to others. The comparison group, however, neither gave nor received any peer feedback. The study followed a pretest, posttest, delayed posttest design. Analyses run on the data obtained from a picture description task and a grammaticality judgment test indicated that the givers made significantly more improvements than the receivers and the receivers, in turn, made significantly more improvements than the comparison group in terms of the forms targeted.

[1]  Trena M. Paulus,et al.  The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing , 1999 .

[2]  Hui-Tzu Min,et al.  Training students to become successful peer reviewers , 2005 .

[3]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections , 2005 .

[4]  A. Tsui,et al.  Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments , 2000 .

[5]  Wei Zhu,et al.  INTERACTION AND FEEDBACK IN MIXED PEER RESPONSE GROUPS , 2001 .

[6]  Hui-Tzu Min.  Why peer comments fail , 2003 .

[7]  Nuwar Mawlawi Diab,et al.  Effects of peer- versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts , 2010 .

[8]  Hui-Tzu Min,et al.  The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality , 2006 .

[9]  Practical Tips for Implementing Peer Editing Tasks in the Foreign Language Classroom. , 2003 .

[10]  D. Schunk.  Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective , 1991 .

[11]  Olga S. Villamil,et al.  Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. , 1994 .

[12]  Karen E. Johnson,et al.  Peer Review Negotiations: Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction , 1994 .

[13]  Kristi Lundstrom,et al.  To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing , 2009 .

[14]  John M. Murphy,et al.  An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions , 1992 .

[15]  Hsien-Chin Liou,et al.  Training Effects on Computer-Mediated Peer Review. , 2009 .

[16]  Jun Liu,et al.  Guiding principles for effective peer response , 2005 .

[17]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Competence perceptions and academic functioning , 2005 .

[18]  Harry C. Denny.  Dangerous liaisons: Reflections on a pilot project for state-mandated outcomes assessment of written communication , 2008 .

[19]  Mrudula Patri,et al.  The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer-assessment of oral skills , 2002 .

[20]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Student revision with peer and expert reviewing , 2010 .

[21]  Guangwei Hu,et al.  Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers , 2005 .

[22]  E. Berg,et al.  The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality , 1999 .

[23]  Paul Rollinson,et al.  Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class , 2005 .