Bareroot Seedling Culture

seed-extraction manager, nursery manager, regeneration Abstract practices that will maximize seed efficiency. Another duty of the regeneration forester is to choose the The attributes of the ideal seedling (ideotype) depend seedling ideotype - or ideal seedling (see 6.2). SUvicul­ on whether the regeneration forester is concerned with turists, the nursery manager, and field foresters together short-term or long-term reforestation goals. Once the should ascertain the best seedling characteristics for the regeneration forester specifies the ideotype, the nursery particular soils (Mountain, Piedmont, or Coastal Plain), manager can proceed to convert'seeds into as many sites (upland or flood plain), method of planting (machine seedlings of the desired ideotype as feasible. This or band), and time of planting (fall, winter, or spring). Chapter reviews some of the practices nursery Discussions should include decisions on genotype. major managers use to modify roots and shoots so the see­ management practices. and lifting schedules, all of which dlings produced will match the desired ideotype. Major can affect seed efficiency. ideotype, and field performance . considerations necessary to produce quality seedlings After evaluating the economic trade offs, the regeneration , - include seed stratification, sowing density, sowing date, forester chooses the ideotype best for each situation. fertilization, and pruning. Emphasis is placed on the Various nursery-management practices affect the time of seedling emergence,' which greatly affects production of the desired ideotype. This chapter reviews mortality, development, and uniformity of the seedling some of the more important practices that affect seedling crop. production and performance.

[1]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Interaction Between Weed Control and Loblolly Pine, Pinus taeda, Seedling Quality , 1988, Weed Technology.

[2]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  New-Ground Syndrome: An Ectomycorrhizal Deficiency in Pine Nurseries , 1988 .

[3]  I. Gibson Sowing Density and Damping-off in Pine Seedlings , 1956 .

[4]  D. S. Kenney,et al.  Commercial Vegetative Inoculum of Pisolithus tinctorius and Inoculation Techniques for Development of Ectomycorrhizae on Container-grown Tree Seedlings , 1982 .

[5]  B. Benzian,et al.  Effect of Late-season Top-dressings of N (and K) applied to Conifer Transplants in the Nursery on their Survival and Growth on British Forest Sites , 1974 .

[6]  H. Williams,et al.  Effects of Fall Irrigation on Morphology and Root Growth Potential of Loblolly Pine Seedlings Growing in Sand , 1988 .

[7]  J. B. White The Influence of Seedling Size and Length of Storage on Longleaf Pine Survival , 1981 .

[8]  R. Driessche Relationship between spacing and nitrogen fertilization of seedlings in the nursery, seedling size, and outplanting performance , 1982 .

[9]  R. Sutton Planting stock quality and grading , 1979 .

[10]  S. A. Ekwebelam,et al.  Effect of light, nitrogen fertilization, and mycorrhizal fungi on growth and photosynthesis of lodgepole pine seedlings , 1983 .

[11]  W. C. Carlson Effects of natural chilling and cold storage on budbreak and root growth potential of loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.) , 1985 .

[12]  H. Williams,et al.  Effect of bud status and seedling biomass on root growth potential of loblolly pine , 1988 .

[13]  D. South,et al.  Survival and growth of loblolly pine as influenced by seedling grade: 13-year results , 1985 .

[14]  Gregory A. Lang,et al.  Endo-, Para-, and Ecodormancy: Physiological Terminology and Classification for Dormancy Research , 1987, HortScience.

[15]  F. Bormann,et al.  The Distribution of Dry Matter Growth between Shoot and Roots in Loblolly Pine , 1970, Botanical Gazette.

[16]  J. Mexal Aspects of mycorrhizal inoculation in relation to reforestation. , 1980 .

[17]  J. Mexal,et al.  Root system modification of container stock for arid land plantings , 1986 .

[18]  M. Greenwood,et al.  Growth of loblolly pine rooted cuttings compared with seedlings , 1987 .

[19]  D. S. Kenney,et al.  Commercial vegetative inoculum of Pisolithus tinctorius and inoculation techniques for development of ectomycorrhizae on bare-root tree seedlings. , 1984 .

[20]  Sasan H. Ardalan,et al.  Automatic Feeding and Sorting of Bare Root Seedlings , 1982 .

[21]  R. Driessche Importance of current photosynthate to new root growth in planted conifer seedlings , 1987 .

[22]  W. C. Carlson Root System Considerations in the Quality of Loblolly Pine Seedlings , 1986 .

[23]  L. E. Hinesley,et al.  Fall Fertilization Helps Longleaf Pine Nursery Stock , 1980 .

[24]  J. N. Boyer,et al.  Seasonal changes in intensity of bud dormancy in loblolly pine seedlings. , 1989, Tree physiology.

[25]  G. E. Hatchell,et al.  Response of Longleaf, Sand, and Loblolly Pines to Pisolithus Ectomycorrhizae and Fertilizer on a Sandhills Site in South Carolina , 1987 .

[26]  J. Mexal,et al.  Growing the "Best" Seedling for Reforestation Success , 1984 .

[27]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[28]  J. J. Stransky,et al.  Terminal Elongation of Loblolly and Shortleaf Pine Seedlings under Soil Moisture Stress , 1964 .

[29]  R. Sands,et al.  Root Regeneration and Plant Water Status of Pinus radiata D. Don Seedlings Transplanted to Different Soil Temperatures , 1979 .

[30]  D. South,et al.  Relationship Between Initial Seedling Height and Survival and Growth of Loblolly Pine Seedlings Planted During a Droughty Year , 1987 .

[31]  P. J. Hawkins,et al.  Morphological Grading Studies with 1-0 Slash Pine Seedlings , 1977 .

[32]  D. South Herbicides for Southern Pine Seedbeds , 1986 .

[33]  P. C. Wakeley Planting southern pines , 1938 .

[34]  J. Mexal,et al.  Inoculation of Nursery Seedbeds with Pisolithus Tinctorius Spores Mixed with Hydromulch Increases Ectomycorrhizae and Growth of Loblolly Pines , 1979 .

[35]  D. South,et al.  Excessive Seedling Height, High Shoot-to-Root Ratio, and Benomyl Root Dip Reduce Survival of Stored Loblolly Pine Seedlings , 1987 .

[36]  T. Maki,et al.  Effects of Soaking with Indolebutyric Acid on Root Development and Survival of Tree Seedlings , 1945, Botanical Gazette.

[37]  J. Isebrands,et al.  The Plastochron Index as Applied to Developmental Studies of Cottonwood , 1971 .

[38]  D. South,et al.  Forest Nursery Practices in the South , 1984 .

[39]  D. South A Re-evaluation of Wakeley's “Critical Tests” of Morphological Grades of Southern Pine Nursery Stock , 1987 .

[40]  C. Cordell,et al.  Control of Charcoal Root Rot with Methyl Bromide in Forest Nurseries , 1979 .

[41]  G. E. Hatchell,et al.  Root stripping of ectomycorrhizae decreases field performance of loblolly and longleaf pine seedlings. , 1986 .

[42]  M. Duryea,et al.  Seedling physiology and reforestation success , 1984, Forestry Sciences.

[43]  D. Marx,et al.  Field performance of Pinus caribaea var. Hondurensis seedlings with specific ectomycorrhizae and fertilizer after three years on a savanna site in Liberia , 1985 .

[44]  J. P. Barnett,et al.  Influence of seed size on germination and early development of loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.) germinants , 1983 .

[45]  D. Donald South African Nursery Practice—The State of the Art , 1986 .

[46]  J. P. Barnett,et al.  Manipulating Loblolly Pine (Pinus Taeda L.) Seed Germination with Simulated Moisture and Temperature Stress , 1984 .

[47]  E. Shoulders Effect of Nursery Bed Density on Loblolly and Slash Pine Seedlings , 1961 .

[48]  D. South,et al.  Root growth potential, seedling morphology and bud dormancy correlate with survival of loblolly pine seedlings planted in December in Alabama. , 1986, Tree physiology.

[49]  D. Marx,et al.  Survival and Growth of Pine Seedlings with Pisolithus Ectomycorrhizae after Two Years on Reforestation Sites in North Carolina and Florida , 1977 .

[50]  D. South Economic Aspects of Nursery Seed Efficiency , 1987 .

[51]  P. Kramer,et al.  The Effects of Nitrogen and Drought on Loblolly Pine Seedlings , 1964 .

[52]  J. Mexal,et al.  Nutrition Management: A Physiological Basis for Yield Improvement , 1984 .

[53]  D. Donald,et al.  The Growth of Pine Seedlings in South African Forest Nurseries , 1982 .

[54]  D. South,et al.  Initial Pinustaeda seedling height relationships with early survival and growth , 1988 .

[55]  R. Warington Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture, 1900 , 1901, Nature.

[56]  J. P. Barnett,et al.  Survival and Growth of Container-Grown and Bare-Root Shortleaf Pine Seedlings with Pisolithus and Thelephora Ectomycorrhizae , 1981 .

[57]  R. Kreh,et al.  Effects of Air Drying on Survival, Height, and Root Growth Potential of Loblolly Pine Seedlings , 1985 .

[58]  J. Walstad,et al.  The effect of wrenching on morphology and field performance of Douglas fir and loblolly pine seedlings , 1976 .

[59]  Thomas G. Daniels The effects of winter plant moisture stress on survival and growth of 2+0 Douglas-fir seedlings , 1978 .

[60]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  A morphological index of Quercus seedling ontogeny for use in studies of physiology and growth. , 1986, Tree physiology.

[61]  J. R. Dunlap,et al.  Root growth potential: its development and expression in forest tree seedlings. , 1980 .

[62]  D. South,et al.  Foliar Nitrogen Content at Lifting Correlates with Early Growth of Loblolly Pine Seedlings from 20 Nurseries , 1988 .

[63]  Walter G Chapman,et al.  Speed of Germination Affects Diameter at Lifting of Nursery-Grown Loblolly Pine Seedlings , 1985 .

[64]  C. Glerum,et al.  The Practicality of Top-root Ratio in Nursery Stock Characterization , 1983 .

[65]  L. E. Nelson,et al.  Effects of Nursery Fertility and Density on Seedling Characteristics, Yield, and Field Performance of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) 1 , 1963 .