Six degrees of cultural diversity and R&D output efficiency

This paper seeks to highlight the efficiency of R&D output as a function of a cultural treatment (i.e. exposure) effect. The focus of our research is on the percolation of new R&D ideas from the immaterial world of creative ideas through the cultural lattice of the locality into the documented world of knowledge. Our conceptual model is illustrated with a novel numerical operationalization of the cultural percolation of ideas hypothesis, based on the six degrees of separation literature and using a dataset compiled from EUROSTAT and the European Social Survey. The estimation strategy for the current work relies on a difference-in-differences method from a network percolation approach, with a series of alternative controls and region-fixed effects. The results show a positive significant role of the stability (‘no change’) of the six degrees of cultural diversity (i.e., the likelihood to have six people in a row in a locality originating from a culturally different origin) as a treatment effect for R&D output efficiency (the latter being measured as the number of new ideas over a millions of euros of R&D investments). The main value added of the paper is that it offers a theoretical justification and numerical illustration on how the six degrees of separation paradigm can be used to approximate the tipping point of the percolation of new ideas through the local social network from the pool of ideas to efficient R&D investment decisions.

[1]  Joan Miquel Verd,et al.  Homophily and heterophily in personal networks. From mutual acquaintance to relationship intensity , 2014 .

[2]  Steven Klepper,et al.  A Reprise of Size and R & D , 1996 .

[3]  H. Uzawa,et al.  Preference, production, and capital: Optimum technical change in an aggregative model of economic growth , 1965 .

[4]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Biodiversity Prospecting Over Time and Under Uncertainty: A Theory of Sorts , 2013 .

[5]  D. Watts,et al.  An Experimental Study of Search in Global Social Networks , 2003, Science.

[6]  Paul M. Romer,et al.  The Origins of Endogenous Growth , 1994 .

[7]  J. Hammersley,et al.  Percolation processes , 1957, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[8]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Economics and Identity , 2000 .

[9]  R. Axelrod The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[10]  M. Fischer,et al.  The impact of human capital on regional labor productivity in Europe , 2008 .

[11]  M E J Newman,et al.  Identity and Search in Social Networks , 2002, Science.

[12]  Scott E. Page,et al.  Problem Solving by Heterogeneous Agents , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[13]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  Innovation Prone and Innovation Averse Societies: Economic Performance in Europe , 1999 .

[14]  A. Pakes,et al.  Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work , 1995 .

[15]  Giovanni Prarolo,et al.  HWWI Research Paper , 2008 .

[16]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  INDUSTRIAL INNOVATION AND SPATIAL SYSTEMS: THE IMPACT OF PRODUCER SERVICES , 1989 .

[17]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  Approximate zero-one laws and sharpness of the percolation transition in a class of models including two-dimensional Ising percolation , 2008, 0809.4184.

[19]  G. Peri,et al.  Cities and Cultures , 2004, World Scientific Studies in International Economics.

[20]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Empirical Patterns of Firm Growth and R&D Investment: A Quality Ladder Model Interpretation , 1997 .

[21]  H. Bethe Statistical Theory of Superlattices , 1935 .

[22]  N. Harabi,et al.  Appropriability of technical innovations an empirical analysis , 1995 .

[23]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  Induced Adoption and Externalities in the Regional Diffusion of Information Technology , 1990 .

[24]  D. Watts The “New” Science of Networks , 2004 .

[25]  Y. Zenou Networks in Economics , 2012 .

[26]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[27]  Annie Tubadji Culture‐based development: empirical evidence for Germany , 2012 .

[28]  P. Romer Capital, Labor, and Productivity , 1991 .

[29]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD , 1995 .

[30]  J. M. Villa Simplifying the estimation of difference in differences treatment effects with Stata , 2012 .

[31]  Giovanni Peri,et al.  The Economic Value of Cultural Diversity: Evidence from Us Cities , 2004 .

[32]  Franz Tödtling,et al.  Technological Change at the Regional Level: The Role of Location, Firm Structure, and Strategy , 1992 .

[33]  Annie Tubadji Culture-based development - culture and institutions: economic development in the regions of Europe , 2013 .

[34]  H. Kesten Percolation theory for mathematicians , 1982 .

[35]  H. Broadman,et al.  Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Right , 1993 .

[36]  Michael Storper,et al.  Regional technology coalitions an essential dimension of national technology policy , 1995 .

[37]  U. Blien,et al.  Cultural Diversity and Local Labour Markets , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[38]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[39]  S. Rebelo,et al.  Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[40]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  R&D Investment and International Productivity Differences , 1992 .

[41]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[43]  Stanley Milgram,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem , 1969 .

[44]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D , 1996 .

[45]  R. Lucas On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[46]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[47]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Reallocating Innovative Resources Around Growth Bottlenecks , 2010 .