Effective Human-Robot Collaboration in near symmetry collision scenarios

Recent works in the domain of Human-Robot Motion (HRM) attempted to plan collision avoidance behavior that accounts for cooperation between agents. Cooperative collision avoidance between humans and robots should be conducted under several factors such as speed, heading and also human attention and intention. Based on some of these factors, people decide their crossing order during collision avoidance. However, whenever situations arise in which the choice crossing order is not consistent for people, the robot is forced to account for the possibility that both agents will assume the same role i.e. a decision detrimental to collision avoidance. In our work we evaluate the boundary that separates the decision to avoid collision as first or last crosser. Approximating the uncertainty around this boundary allows our collision avoidance strategy to address this problem based on the insight that the robot should plan its collision avoidance motion in such a way that, even if agents, at first, incorrectly choose the same crossing order, they would be able to unambiguously perceive their crossing order on their following collision avoidance action.

[1]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Anticipatory robot path planning in human environments , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[2]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Realtime Multilevel Crowd Tracking Using Reciprocal Velocity Obstacles , 2014, 2014 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[3]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[4]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Reciprocal n-Body Collision Avoidance , 2011, ISRR.

[5]  B. Steffen,et al.  A Modification of the Social Force Model by Foresight , 2009, 0912.0634.

[6]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Influence of person- and situation-specific characteristics on collision avoidance behavior in human locomotion. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Dieter Kraft,et al.  Algorithm 733: TOMP–Fortran modules for optimal control calculations , 1994, TOMS.

[8]  Julien Pettré,et al.  Collision avoidance between two walkers: role-dependent strategies. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[9]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  Review article Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion , 1997 .

[10]  J. Pettré,et al.  Minimal predicted distance: a common metric for collision avoidance during pairwise interactions between walkers. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[11]  P. Molnár Social Force Model for Pedestrian Dynamics Typeset Using Revt E X 1 , 1995 .

[12]  Dirk Wollherr,et al.  Measuring the Effectiveness of Readability for Mobile Robot Locomotion , 2016, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[13]  Julien Pettré,et al.  Human Inspired Effort Distribution During Collision Avoidance in Human-Robot Motion , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[14]  Gonzalo Ferrer,et al.  Proactive kinodynamic planning using the Extended Social Force Model and human motion prediction in urban environments , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  Paul A. Braren,et al.  How We Avoid Collisions With Stationary and Moving Obstacles , 2004 .

[16]  Nicholas Roy,et al.  Feature-Based Prediction of Trajectories for Socially Compliant Navigation , 2013 .

[17]  Olivier Stasse,et al.  How do walkers behave when crossing the way of a mobile robot that replicates human interaction rules? , 2018, Gait & posture.

[18]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Teaching mobile robots to cooperatively navigate in populated environments , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[20]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Socially compliant mobile robot navigation via inverse reinforcement learning , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..