Accommodations for Individual Differences without Classroom Ability Groups: An Experiment in School Restructuring

This study examined an alternative approach for organizing reading and language arts instruction to accommodate individual differences in reading ability. The approach featured Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC), conducted without ability groups, with cross-age and peer tutoring, supplementary phonics instruction for some students, and classroom-based instruction from compensatory and special education teachers. Students in regular, remedial, and special education were included in an experimental and a control school. We found significant effects on reading vocabulary, total reading, and language scores in favor of the experimental school; but on several other measures, including behavior ratings, we did not detect treatment effects.

[1]  R. Allington,et al.  The Congruence of Classroom and Remedial Reading Instruction , 1985, The Elementary School Journal.

[2]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[3]  C. Juel.  Effects of Reading Group Assignment on Reading Development in First and Second Grade , 1990 .

[4]  M. Will.  Educating Students with Learning Problems--A Shared Responsibility. A Report to the Secretary. , 1986 .

[5]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Success for All: First-Year Outcomes of a Comprehensive Plan for Reforming Urban Education , 1990 .

[6]  R. Slavin,et al.  Mainstreaming Students with Mild Handicaps: Academic and Social Outcomes , 1983 .

[7]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Elementary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 1986 .

[8]  R. Allington.  Teacher interruption behaviors during primary-grade oral reading. , 1980 .

[9]  P. Shields,et al.  Reconceiving Academic Instruction for the Children of Poverty. , 1990 .

[10]  Richard I. Parker,et al.  Progress Monitoring with Objective Measures of Writing Performance for Students with Mild Disabilities , 1991, Exceptional children.

[11]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  The effects of cooperative learning and direct instruction in reading comprehension strategies on main idea identification. , 1991 .

[12]  Elfrieda H. Hiebert,et al.  An Examination of Ability Grouping for Reading Instruction. , 1983 .

[13]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition: Two Field Experiments. , 1987 .

[14]  Rebecca Barr,et al.  How Schools Work , 1991 .

[15]  J. Guthrie.  The Maze Technique to Assess, Monitor Reading Comprehension. , 1974 .

[16]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-monitoring activities , 1983 .

[17]  J. R. Jenkins,et al.  An Examination of the Concurrent Validity of the Basic Academic Skills Samples (BASS) , 1992 .

[18]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Interdependence and Interpersonal Attraction Among Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Individuals: A Theoretical Formulation and a Meta-analysis of the Research , 1983 .

[19]  Richard L. Allington,et al.  Content Coverage and Contextual Reading in Reading Groups , 1984 .

[20]  Linda M. Jenkins,et al.  Peer Tutoring in Elementary and Secondary Programs. , 1985 .

[21]  Joseph R. Jenkins,et al.  Reading Instruction in Special Education Resource Rooms , 1986 .

[22]  P. Harrison,et al.  Walker-McConnell Scale of Social Competence and School Adjustment , 1989, Diagnostique.

[23]  R. Allington,et al.  COMPREHENSION AND COHERENCE: NEGLECTED ELEMENTS OF LITERACY INSTRUCTION IN REMEDIAL AND RESOURCE ROOM SERVICES , 1990 .