Race, baseline characteristics, and clinical outcomes after coronary intervention: The New Approaches in Coronary Interventions (NACI) registry.

BACKGROUND The impact of race and sex on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions remains incompletely understood. Specific data on patient demographics, lesion characteristics, and outcomes of black versus white patients are poorly described. To further evaluate these issues, we analyzed the New Approaches in Coronary Interventions (NACI) registry. METHODS Patients (200 black, 4279 white) undergoing coronary interventions in the NACI trial were compared. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine which baseline demographics were independent risk factors for the combined end point of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and coronary artery bypass grafting at 1 year. RESULTS Black patients were significantly younger (age 59 +/- 11 vs 63 +/- 11 years; P <.001), more often obese (29.6 +/- 6 vs 27.5 +/- 4.8 kg/m(2); P <.001), female (50% vs 34%; P <.001), diabetic (34% vs 21%; P <.001), and hypertensive (71% vs 52%; P <.001). Black patients were significantly more likely to have single-vessel disease (48% vs 40%; P <.05) and less likely to have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (26% vs 34%; P <.05). Blacks were significantly more likely to have a discrete lesion (85% vs 62%; P <. 001) with less thrombus (7% vs 12%; P <.05), tortuosity (17% vs 25%; P <.05), and an ulcerated appearance (5% vs 10%; P <.05). Despite these significant baseline differences, no significant difference was seen in the procedural success (80% vs 82%) or major adverse events (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, any revascularization) at 1 year (39% vs 34%). Predictors of adverse events for white patients included diabetes (relative risk [RR] = 1.24; confidence intervals [CI], 1.0-1.5) and high-risk status (RR = 1.58; CI, 1.26-1. 91). Predictive characteristics of adverse events for black patients included only sex (RR = 3.45; CI, 1.27-9.35; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS There are significant differences in baseline characteristics of black patients compared with white patients. Despite these differences in traditional risk factors, they do not affect procedural success or 1-year outcome. In black patients, only sex predicted adverse events. Additional investigation is required to understand the mechanisms for this difference.

[1]  W. Rogers,et al.  Management and outcomes for black patients with acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era , 1998 .

[2]  A. Folsom,et al.  Trends in the incidence of myocardial infarction and in mortality due to coronary heart disease, 1987 to 1994. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  D. Baim,et al.  New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) registry: history and methods. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  R. Califf,et al.  Racial variation in the use of coronary-revascularization procedures. Are the differences real? Do they matter? , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  D. Reda,et al.  Comparison of plasma lipid and lipoprotein profiles in hypertensive black versus white men. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  B. Phillips,et al.  Racial and gender differences in endothelin-1. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  A. Sherwood,et al.  Ethnic differences in forearm vasodilator capacity. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Racial differences in the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy among chronic cocaine abusers. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  J. Gardin,et al.  Relationship of cardiovascular risk factors to echocardiographic left ventricular mass in healthy young black and white adult men and women. The CARDIA study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults. , 1995, Circulation.

[10]  Daniel L. McGee,et al.  The relative effects of left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary artery disease, and ventricular dysfunction on survival among black adults. , 1995, JAMA.

[11]  S. Kelsey,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in African-American patients (the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 1985-1986 Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry). , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  J. Laragh,et al.  Comparison of left ventricular mass and geometry in black and white patients with essential hypertension. , 1993, American journal of hypertension.

[13]  R. Cooper,et al.  Survival rates with coronary artery disease for black women compared with black men. , 1992, JAMA.

[14]  D. Levy,et al.  Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  B. Simmons,et al.  Survival determinants in black patients with angiographically defined coronary artery disease. , 1990, American heart journal.

[16]  F. Dunn,et al.  Racial differences in cardiac adaptation to essential hypertension determined by echocardiography indexes , 1983 .