The risk game.

Abstract In the context of health, safety, and environmental decisions, the concept of risk involves value judgments that reflect much more than just the probability and consequences of the occurrence of an event. This article conceptualizes the act of defining and assessing risk as a game, in which the rules must be socially negotiated within the context of a specific problem. This contextualist view of risk provides insight into why technical approaches to risk management often fail with problems such as those involving radiation and chemicals, where scientific experts and the public disagree on the nature of the risks. It also highlights the need for allowing the interested and affected parties to define and play the game, thus emphasizing the importance of institutional, procedural, and societal processes in risk-management decisions.

[1]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  H. Kunreuther Mitigating disaster losses through insurance , 1996 .

[4]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation , 1995 .

[5]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science , 1992 .

[6]  R. Gregory,et al.  The Role of Past States in Determining Reference Points for Policy Decisions , 1993 .

[7]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[8]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[9]  Siting low-level radioactive waste disposal facilities , 1993 .

[10]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Siting noxious facilities: A test of the Facility Siting Credo , 1993 .

[11]  Joseph V. Rodricks,et al.  The Analysis of Actual Versus Perceived Risks , 1983, Advances in Risk Analysis.

[12]  K. Shrader-Frechette Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms , 1991 .

[13]  Bernard L. Cohen,et al.  Criteria for Technology Acceptability1 , 1985 .

[14]  W. Dean,et al.  Competing Conceptions of Risk , 1996 .

[15]  S. Breyer Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation , 1993 .

[16]  Natural Hazards: An Integrative Framework for Research and Planning , 1991 .

[17]  S. Krimsky,et al.  Social Theories of Risk , 1992 .

[18]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm , 1992 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.