Different orientations of males and females in computer-mediated negotiations

This paper examines the existence of gender differences in computer mediated (CM) negotiations where ''gender differences'' refers to the differential patterns of behavior of males and females proposed by Rubin and Brown (Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. R. (1975). Bargainers as individuals. In The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation (pp. 157-196). New York: Academic Press). Namely, males are more profit oriented and females are more relationship oriented. External manipulations encouraging cooperativeness with other negotiators either by profitable or social incentives were inserted in the negotiations performed within the Colored Trails (CT) game framework. The negotiators included 27 females and 33 males who negotiated in foursomes via computers. In the first study we focused on independent negotiators whose success was not crucially dependent on the other party. In the second study negotiators were dependent upon one another, encouraging integrative solutions. The findings reveal that the social incentive (team factor) positively affected the females' cooperativeness in contrast to males who were slightly less cooperative. On the other hand, profitable incentive influenced the males' cooperativeness level, while no change was shown by females, which is consistent with Rubin and Brown's distinction. These tendencies were reduced when playing with a non-reciprocal simulated agent. The causes for gender differences in CM as well as in face-to-face (FTF) negotiations are discussed.

[1]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Media Effects and Communication Bias in Diverse Groups , 1997 .

[2]  William P. Smith,et al.  INTEGRATIVE BARGAINING: DOES GENDER MAKE A DIFFERENCE? , 1999 .

[3]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. , 2002 .

[4]  Jeffrey Z. Rubin.  7 – Bargainers as Individuals , 1975 .

[5]  J. Rubin,et al.  The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation , 1975 .

[6]  Maryalice Citera,et al.  HOSTILE BEHAVIOR AND PROFIT IN VIRTUAL NEGOTIATION , 2005 .

[7]  David Gefen,et al.  If you spoke as she does, sir, instead of the way you do: a sociolinguistics perspective of gender differences in virtual communities , 2005, DATB.

[8]  C. Insko,et al.  Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: categorization, reciprocation, or fear? , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Chimpanzee Politics : Sex and Power among Apes , 2022 .

[10]  B. Danet.  Text as mask: gender, play, and performance on the Internet , 1998 .

[11]  Ştefan Boncu,et al.  E. Tory Higgins si Arie Kruglanski (coord.), Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles, Guilford, New York, 1997 , 1998 .

[12]  Paul H. Delfabbro,et al.  Predictors of Irrational Thinking in Regular Slot Machine Gamblers , 2000, The Journal of psychology.

[13]  Barbara B. Smuts,et al.  Chimpanzee Politics: Sex and power among Apes: By Frans B.M. de Waal. New York: Harper and Row, 1982, 223 pp., $16.50 , 1985 .

[14]  Amira Galin,et al.  E-negotiation versus face-to-face negotiation what has changed - if anything? , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Ya'akov Gal,et al.  Social Preferences in Relational Contexts , 2004 .

[16]  Steven G. Jones.  Cybersociety 2.0: revisiting computer-mediated communication and community , 1998 .

[17]  Michal Pechoucek,et al.  Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems , 2005, AAMAS 2005.

[18]  P. Bordia.  Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature , 1997 .

[19]  Martin Euwema,et al.  Conflict and gender , 1994 .

[20]  Doron Sonsino,et al.  Strategic pattern recognition - experimental evidence , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[21]  D. Buss,et al.  The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. , 1996 .

[22]  M. Brewer,et al.  Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics , 1978 .

[23]  Alice F. Stuhlmacher,et al.  Gender and Negotiator Competitiveness: A Meta-analysis. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[24]  A. Eagly,et al.  The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles , 1987 .

[25]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[26]  Jim Sheffield,et al.  The effects of bargaining orientation and communication medium on negotiations in the bilateral monopoly task: a comparison of decision room and computer conferencing communication media , 1989, CHI '89.

[27]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour , 1973 .

[28]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[29]  Ya'akov Gal,et al.  Learning Social Preferences in Games , 2004, AAAI.

[30]  Steven A. Lewis,et al.  Effects of visual access and orientation on the discovery of integrative bargaining alternatives , 1977 .

[31]  A. Eagly.  Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation , 1987 .

[32]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[33]  A. Isen,et al.  The Influence of Positive Affect and Visual Access on the Discovery of Integrative Solutions in Bilateral Negotiation , 1986 .

[34]  E. Vance Wilson,et al.  Persuasive Effects of System Features in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2005, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[35]  Steven D. Seilheimer,et al.  Looking and Competing: Accountability and Visual Access in Integrative Bargaining , 1981 .

[36]  Alan Durndell,et al.  'I totally agree with you': gender interactions in educational online discussion groups , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[37]  Carol Watson,et al.  Gender versus Power as a Predictor of Negotiation Behavior and Outcomes , 1994 .

[38]  W. Hippel.  A Social Psychological Perspective , 1994 .

[39]  L. Thompson,et al.  Battle of the sexes: gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  H. Tajfel.  Experiments in intergroup discrimination. , 1970 .

[41]  Rosanna E. Guadagno,et al.  Persuade him by email, but see her in person: Online persuasion revisited , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Terry Nardin.  Negotiations: Social-Psychological Perspectives . Edited by Druckman Daniel. (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1977. Pp. 416. $25.00.) The Negotiation Process: Theories and Applications . Edited by Zartman I. William. (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1978. Pp. 240. $16.95, cloth; $6.95, paper.) , 1979 .

[43]  Ya'akov Gal,et al.  Adapting to agents' personalities in negotiation , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[44]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  The influence of social dependencies on decision-making: initial investigations with a new game , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..