Distance: A critical aspect for environmental impact assessment of hydraulic fracking

Abstract Public concerns about hydraulic fracking are growing and scientists continue to analyze and evaluate its associated environmental impacts. However, a rigorous spatial analysis of environmental impacts is necessary to provide a perspective on risk based on proximity to fracking wells. This comment describes the environmental impacts of fracking within a spatial context. It emphasizes five key points: (1) the closer to a hydraulic fracking well, the higher the risk of groundwater and drinking water well contamination; (2) residents living nearest to a fracking well experience a higher human health risk due to exposure to gas emissions during the fracking process; (3) huge and high density gas emissions are detected and recorded close to fracking wells; (4) fracking induces seismicity and small earthquakes are recorded close to fracking wells; and (5) hydraulic fracking directly changes local environment and landscape characteristics. Spatial impact assessments are critical for improving understanding of the impacts of hydraulic fracking on the environment and society.

[1]  Gabrielle Pétron,et al.  Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range: A pilot study , 2012 .

[2]  Qingmin Meng,et al.  Modeling and prediction of natural gas fracking pad landscapes in the Marcellus Shale region, USA , 2014 .

[3]  A. Ingraffea,et al.  Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations , 2011 .

[4]  R. Kerr.  Energy. Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene. , 2010, Science.

[5]  D A V I,et al.  Natural Gas Plays in the Marcellus Shale : Challenges and Potential Opportunities , 2010 .

[6]  R. Jackson,et al.  Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Increased stray gas abundance in a subset of drinking water wells near Marcellus shale gas extraction , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  T. Engelder,et al.  Natural gas: Should fracking stop? , 2011, Nature.

[9]  W. M. Griffin,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Marcellus shale gas , 2011 .

[10]  Lisa M McKenzie,et al.  Human health risk assessment of air emissions from development of unconventional natural gas resources. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Charles W. Schmidt,et al.  Blind Rush? Shale Gas Boom Proceeds Amid Human Health Questions , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  Robert W Howarth,et al.  Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Won-Young Kim,et al.  Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection into a deep well in Youngstown, Ohio , 2013 .

[14]  K. Révész,et al.  Carbon and hydrogen isotopic evidence for the origin of combustible gases in water-supply wells in north-central Pennsylvania , 2010 .

[15]  J. Abad,et al.  Impact of Shale Gas Development on Regional Water Quality , 2013, Science.