Environmental effects of agri-environmental schemes in Western Europe

Agri-environmental schemes (AES) have been introduced as part of European Union’s (EU) Common Agricultural Policy and are now an important part of this. A methodological approach to analyse the policy effects of AES is outlined, in which we distinguish between performance effects (on agricultural practices) and outcome effects (environmental impact). The performance effects are further approached including measurement of improvement and protection effects based on 12 indicators on changes/maintenance of land use and agricultural management. Data from personal interviews of participating and non-participating farmers in AES measures in nine EU Member States and Switzerland were used to analyse policy effects, including single indicator effects on agricultural practices as well as combined effects at the agreement level. Significant effects were found for mineral N-fertiliser use, stocking density reduction, maintenance of a minimum livestock density and pesticides. For AES agreements regulating grassland management, fertiliser use and pesticides, clear indications of combined improvement and protection effects were found. In addition clear improvement effects of agreements regulating fertiliser and pesticides use on mainly arable lands were revealed. It is concluded that the approach presented including the 12 selected indicators has proven to be operational. q 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Restoring a sustainable countryside , 2002 .

[2]  J. Sumpsi,et al.  Agri-environmental indicators for extensive land-use systems in the Iberian Peninsula. , 1999 .

[3]  G. Huylenbroeck,et al.  Countryside stewardship : farmers, policies, and markets , 1999 .

[4]  M. Whitby,et al.  Comparative evaluation of environmental policies: ESAs in a policy context , 1994 .

[5]  Henry Buller.  Regulation 2078: patterns of implementation. , 2000 .

[6]  S. Wirén-Lehr,et al.  Sustainability in agriculture — an evaluation of principal goal-oriented concepts to close the gap between theory and practice , 2001 .

[7]  Jørgen Primdahl,et al.  Agri-environmental schemes and the European agricultural landscapes: the role of indicators as valuing tools for evaluation , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  M. Andreolia,et al.  Farm sustainability evaluation : methodology and practice , 1999 .

[9]  M. Whitby,et al.  The agri-environmental measures in the context of the CAP reform. , 1996 .

[10]  Mairi Jay.  Against the Grain: Agri-Environmental Reform in the United States and the European Union , 2000 .

[11]  S. Wotton,et al.  Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus) in Devon, UK , 2001 .

[12]  David Kleijn,et al.  Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes , 2001, Nature.

[13]  P. Carey.  Schemes are monitored and effective in the UK , 2001, Nature.

[14]  M. Whitby.  The European Environment and CAP Reform: Policies and Prospects for Conservation , 1996 .

[15]  Samuel R. Aldrich,et al.  Agriculture and Environment , 1973 .