CROSSROADS - Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments

Our purpose is to clarify the microfoundations of performance in dynamic environments. A key premise is that the microfoundational link from organization, strategy, and dynamic capabilities to performance centers on how leaders manage the fundamental tension between efficiency and flexibility. We develop several insights. First, regarding structure, we highlight that organizations often drift toward efficiency, and so balancing efficiency and flexibility comes, counterintuitively, through unbalancing to favor flexibility. Second, we argue that environmental dynamism, rather than being simply stable or dynamic, is a multidimensional construct with dimensions that uniquely influence the importance and ease of balancing efficiency and flexibility. Third, we outline how executives balance efficiency and flexibility through cognitively sophisticated, single solutions rather than by simply holding contradictions. Overall, we go beyond the caricature of new organizational forms as obsessed with fluidity and the simplistic view of routines as the microfoundation of performance. Rather, we contribute a more accurate view of how leaders effectively balance between efficiency and flexibility by emphasizing heuristics-based “strategies of simple rules,” multiple environmental realities, and higher-order “expert” cognition. Together, these insights seek to add needed precision to the microfoundations of performance in dynamic environments.

[1]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[2]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[3]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[4]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[5]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Strategy-organization configurations in corporate venture units: Impact on performance and survival , 2008 .

[6]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[7]  Paul J. Barber Applied Cognitive Psychology: An Information Processing Approach , 1988 .

[8]  S. Kauffman At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[9]  C. Ciborra The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structures, and Surprises , 1996 .

[10]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[11]  B. Adelson Problem solving and the development of abstract categories in programming languages , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[12]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[13]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Surviving task interruptions: Investigating the implications of long-term working memory theory , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms , 2001 .

[15]  P. Barr,et al.  Cognitive change, strategic action and organizational renewal , 1993 .

[16]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[17]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Constructing Markets and Shaping Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Power in Nascent Fields , 2009 .

[18]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[19]  Alessandro Narduzzo,et al.  Talking about routines in the field: the emergence of organizational capabilities in a new cellular phone network company , 1997 .

[20]  H. Rao The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry: 1895–1912 , 1994 .

[21]  Clark G. Gilbert,et al.  Change in the Presence of Residual Fit: Can Competing Frames Coexist? , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[23]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[24]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[25]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[26]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[27]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[28]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[29]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[30]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[31]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .

[32]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[33]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Executive Succession, Strategic Reorientation and Performance Growth: A Longitudinal Study in the U.S. Cement Industry in Stable Environments , 1996 .

[34]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[35]  J. Lachman,et al.  Cognitive Psychology and Information Processing: An Introduction , 1979 .

[36]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[37]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[38]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[39]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Lloyd A. Jobe,et al.  Balancing vertical integration and strategic outsourcing: effects on product portfolio, product success, and firm performance , 2006 .

[41]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[42]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[43]  Robert J. Jensen,et al.  Presumptive Adaptation and the Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer , 2006 .

[44]  S. Ian Robertson,et al.  Problem-solving , 2001, Human Thinking.

[45]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[46]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[47]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[48]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[49]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Building Micro-foundations for the Routines, Capabilities, and Performance Links , 2007 .

[50]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[51]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[52]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[53]  D. Herrmann,et al.  Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. , 1982 .

[54]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Rewiring: Cross-Business-Unit Collaborations in Multibusiness Organizations , 2010 .

[55]  W. Boeker Executive Migration and Strategic Change: The Effect of Top Manager Movement on Product-Market Entry , 1997 .

[56]  S. Karim Modularity in Organizational Structure: The Reconfiguration of Internally Developed and Acquired Business Units , 2006 .

[57]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[58]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[59]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[60]  Suresh Kotha,et al.  Continuous “Morphing”: Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and Function , 2001 .

[61]  Alfred D. Chandler Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise , 1962 .

[62]  Teppo Felin,et al.  Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks and Systems Strategic Organization: a Field in Search of Micro- Foundations Strategic Organization: a Field in Search of Micro-foundations , 2022 .

[63]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[64]  Timothy W. Ruefli,et al.  Schumpeter's ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? , 2005 .

[65]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules , 2009 .

[66]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[67]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Organization Design and Effectiveness over the Innovation Life Cycle , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[68]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Origin of Alliance Portfolios: Entrepreneurs, Network Strategies, and Firm Performance , 2009 .

[69]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Change in the Presence of Fit: the Rise, the Fall, and the Renaissance of Liz Claiborne , 2001 .

[70]  Nathan Furr Cognitive flexibility: The adaptive reality of concrete organization change , 2009 .

[71]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Cognition and Hierarchy: Rethinking the Microfoundations of Capabilities' Development , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[72]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[73]  S. Hall,et al.  Surviving Radical Technological Change through Dynamic Capability : Evidence from the Typesetter Industry , 2005 .

[74]  B. Schwartz Psychology of Learning and Behavior , 1978 .

[75]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Learning: A Field Study , 2001 .

[76]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. , 2002, Psychological review.

[77]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[78]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function , 2002 .

[79]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[80]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[81]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[82]  Stewart H. Hulse Psychology of Learning , 1980 .

[83]  M. Scheerer,et al.  Problem Solving , 1967, Nature.

[84]  Irem Demirkan,et al.  The Performance Consequences of Ambidexterity in Strategic Alliance Formations: Empirical Investigation and Computational Theorizing , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[85]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path , 2009 .

[86]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[87]  C. Gilbert Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity , 2005 .

[88]  Christopher B. Bingham,et al.  What makes a process a capability? Heuristics, strategy, and effective capture of opportunities , 2007 .

[89]  K. Duncker A Qualitative (Experimental and Theoretical) Study of Productive Thinking (Solving of Comprehensible Problems) , 1926 .

[90]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  The Influence of Organizational Acquisition Experience on Acquisition Performance: A Behavioral Learning Perspective , 1999 .

[91]  Charles Williams,et al.  Focusing Firm Evolution: The Impact of Information Infrastructure on Market Entry by U.S. Telecommunications Companies, 1984 - 1998 , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[92]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[93]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Strategy as simple rules. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[94]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[95]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .