Time, space, place, and the Bonn Challenge global forest restoration target

The Bonn Challenge, a global effort to begin restoring 350 million hectares of degraded forest landscapes by 2030, was launched in 2011. To date countries have committed to restore more than 60 million hectares as part of the Bonn Challenge. As global decision‐makers, governments, and communities join the effort to restore degraded land, new questions about the economics of restoration have emerged. Critics argue that restoration takes too long, costs too much, and produces too few benefits to justify public or private expenditures. This paper addresses these concerns by presenting a methodology for valuing the net benefits of large‐scale ecosystem restoration initiatives by estimating the net benefit of achieving the Bonn Challenge. This paper also estimates the net benefit of achieving the Bonn Challenge restoration target under different social discounting regimes, different valuations of public goods, and different time horizons to see how they affect the argument for investing society's scarce resources in restoration. The results suggest that achieving the Bonn Challenge would generate a net benefit of between U.S.$0.7 and U.S.$9 trillion. The results show that restoration can create benefits that exceed its costs and that the value of these benefits might differ depending on the discount rate. The results show that lower social discount rates correspond to higher restoration rates. This suggests that the Bonn Challenge target is more likely to be met when a low social discount rate is used to discount the benefits and costs of restoration.

[1]  G. Daily,et al.  Restoring Value to the World's Degraded Lands , 1995, Science.

[2]  QK Ahmad,et al.  Climate change 1995. Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change , 1997 .

[3]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[4]  R. Lind,et al.  Intertemporal Equity, Discounting, and Economic Efficiency in Water Policy Evaluation , 1997 .

[5]  Scott Barrett,et al.  Intergenerational Equity, Social Discount Rates and Global Warming , 2000 .

[6]  C. Tucker,et al.  A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of Northern forests , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  T. Quinn Public Lands and Private Recreation Enterprise: Policy Issues from a Historical Perspective , 2002 .

[8]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality , 2007 .

[9]  H. Ouyang,et al.  Evaluation of the economic and environmental impact of converting cropland to forest: a case study in Dunhua county, China. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  E. Barbier Valuing Ecosystem Services as Productive Inputs , 2007 .

[11]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Proxy global assessment of land degradation , 2008 .

[12]  J. Broome The ethics of climate change. , 2008, Scientific American.

[13]  Gretchen C. Daily,et al.  Using return‐on‐investment to guide restoration: a case study from Hawaii , 2008 .

[14]  J. Blignaut,et al.  Getting serious about maintaining biodiversity , 2008 .

[15]  A. Newton,et al.  Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Science.

[16]  S. Pagiola,et al.  Estimating the costs of REDD at the country level , 2009 .

[17]  K. Esler,et al.  Are Socioeconomic Benefits of Restoration Adequately Quantified? A Meta‐analysis of Recent Papers (2000–2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 Other Scientific Journals , 2010 .

[18]  Thomas Kitzberger,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of dryland forest restoration evaluated by spatial analysis of ecosystem services , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  A. Markandya,et al.  Economic Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services Losses: Cost of Policy Inaction , 2011 .

[20]  J. Aronson,et al.  Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  Valerie Graw,et al.  The Economics of Desertification, Land Degradation, and Drought Toward an Integrated Global Assessment , 2011 .

[22]  Laura Nahuelhual,et al.  Assessing the benefits and costs of dryland forest restoration in central Chile. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  Minjuan Zhao,et al.  Ecological restoration programs and payments for ecosystem services as integrated biophysical and socioeconomic processes—China's experience as an example , 2012 .

[24]  Michael James Howes,et al.  Evaluating Ecological Restoration Success: A Review of the Literature , 2013 .

[25]  Thomas Elmqvist,et al.  Benefits of Investing in Ecosystem Restoration , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[26]  Jeffery R. Scott,et al.  Integrated economic and climate projections for impact assessment , 2013, Climatic Change.

[27]  J. Blignaut,et al.  The economics of restoration: looking back and leaping forward , 2014, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  W. Nordhaus Estimates of the Social Cost of Carbon: Concepts and Results from the DICE-2013R Model and Alternative Approaches , 2014, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

[29]  P. Sutton,et al.  Changes in the global value of ecosystem services , 2014 .