Innovation and Design: Computational Simulations

This paper explores the role that social evaluation has in the definition of design as a source of innovation. The question of interest is how differences between the evaluative processes of group members can potentially determine the success or the failure of novel ideas in design. Computational simulations are presented of a simple design task in a social system where the effects of different types of group evaluation are analysed in relation to the diffusion of ideas, their differentiation, and the quality ascribed to them by evaluator groups. These results serve to formulate a series of qualitative hypotheses about group evaluation in design as well as practical guidelines for group brainstorming. The current contribution of these in silico studies is to assist in reasoning about innovation and design in a way that conventional research does not support.

[1]  Sharon Bailin.  CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT , 2002 .

[2]  Martin Stacey,et al.  Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes , 1988 .

[3]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Psychology of Group Influence , 1981 .

[4]  Howard Gardner,et al.  The creators' patterns. , 1994 .

[5]  Margaret Bruce,et al.  WINNING BY DESIGN , 1992 .

[6]  Frank Rubin,et al.  A Search Procedure for Hamilton Paths and Circuits , 1974, JACM.

[7]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  The domain of creativity. , 1990 .

[8]  Tore Kristensen,et al.  Winning by Design: Technology, Product Design and International Competitiveness , 1994 .

[9]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Sociology and Social Theory in Agent Based Social Simulation: A Symposium , 2001, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[10]  R. Hegselmann,et al.  Simulating Social Phenomena , 1997 .

[11]  J. Gero,et al.  A Computational Framework for the Study of Creativity and Innovation in Design: Effects of Social Ties , 2004 .

[12]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Leonardo's laptop: human needs and the new computing technologies , 2005, CIKM '05.

[13]  D. Sallach,et al.  Proceedings of the Agent 2002 Conference on Social Agents : Ecology, Exchange, and Evolution , 2003 .

[14]  Stephen Potter,et al.  Winning by Design: Technology, Product Design and International Competitiveness , 1992 .

[15]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[16]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Changing the World: A Framework for the Study of Creativity , 1994 .

[17]  Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Varieties of emergence , 2002 .

[18]  Vinod Goel,et al.  A comparison of design and nondesign problem spaces , 1994, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[19]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .