Visualizing the Impact of Art: An Update and Comparison of Current Psychological Models of Art Experience

The last decade has witnessed a renaissance of empirical and psychological approaches to art study, especially regarding cognitive models of art processing experience. This new emphasis on modeling has often become the basis for our theoretical understanding of human interaction with art. Models also often define areas of focus and hypotheses for new empirical research, and are increasingly important for connecting psychological theory to discussions of the brain. However, models are often made by different researchers, with quite different emphases or visual styles. Inputs and psychological outcomes may be differently considered, or can be under-reported with regards to key functional components. Thus, we may lose the major theoretical improvements and ability for comparison that can be had with models. To begin addressing this, this paper presents a theoretical assessment, comparison, and new articulation of a selection of key contemporary cognitive or information-processing-based approaches detailing the mechanisms underlying the viewing of art. We review six major models in contemporary psychological aesthetics. We in turn present redesigns of these models using a unified visual form, in some cases making additions or creating new models where none had previously existed. We also frame these approaches in respect to their targeted outputs (e.g., emotion, appraisal, physiological reaction) and their strengths within a more general framework of early, intermediate, and later processing stages. This is used as a basis for general comparison and discussion of implications and future directions for modeling, and for theoretically understanding our engagement with visual art.

[1]  A. Clark Radical predictive processing , 2015 .

[2]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  The Appeal of Challenge in the Perception of Art: How Ambiguity, Solvability of Ambiguity, and the Opportunity for Insight Affect Appreciation , 2015 .

[3]  Peer F. Bundgaard,et al.  Investigations into the phenomenology and the ontology of the work of art : what are artworks and how do we experience them? , 2015 .

[4]  Matthew Pelowski Tears and transformation: feeling like crying as an indicator of insightful or “aesthetic” experience with art , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[5]  H. Leder,et al.  Aesthetic emotions to art - What they are and what makes them special: Comment on "The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model" by S. Koelsch et al. , 2015, Physics of life reviews.

[6]  Jan R. Landwehr,et al.  A Dual-Process Perspective on Fluency-Based Aesthetics , 2015, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[7]  D. Berlyne Conflict, arousal, and curiosity , 2014 .

[8]  H. Leder,et al.  Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments : The aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. , 2014, British journal of psychology.

[9]  Fuminori Akiba,et al.  When a Body Meets a Body: An Exploration of the Negative Impact of Social Interactions on Museum Experiences of Art. , 2014 .

[10]  Pablo P. L. Tinio From artistic creation to aesthetic reception: The mirror model of art , 2013 .

[11]  C. Mirasso,et al.  Dynamics of brain networks in the aesthetic appreciation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  A. Clark Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[13]  E. Wildt,et al.  Long-term Effect of Aesthetic Education on Visual Awareness , 2013 .

[14]  Nicolas J. Bullot,et al.  The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  D. Zaidel,et al.  An evolutionary approach to art and aesthetic experience. , 2013 .

[16]  Helmut Leder,et al.  Next steps in neuroaesthetics: Which processes and processing stages to study? , 2013 .

[17]  Fuminori Akiba,et al.  Satori, koan and aesthetic experience: Exploring the “realization of emptiness” in Buddhist enlightenment via an empirical study of modern art , 2012, Psyke & Logos.

[18]  Andrea Schankin,et al.  Assessing aesthetic appreciation of visual artworks—The construction of the Art Reception Survey (ARS). , 2012 .

[19]  W. Mansell,et al.  Exploring the Role of Art-Making in Recovery, Change, and Self-Understanding---An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Interviews with Everyday Creative People , 2012 .

[20]  W. Tschacher,et al.  Physiological Correlates of Aesthetic Perception of Artworks in a Museum , 2012 .

[21]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Putting reward in art: A tentative prediction error account of visual art , 2011, i-Perception.

[22]  Gerald C. Cupchik,et al.  The digitized self in the Internet age. , 2011 .

[23]  C. Carbon Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation , 2011, i-Perception.

[24]  Fuminori Akiba,et al.  A model of art perception, evaluation and emotion in transformative aesthetic experience , 2011 .

[25]  P. Silvia,et al.  On personality and piloerection: Individual differences in aesthetic chills and other unusual aesthetic experiences. , 2011 .

[26]  Joseph P. Huston,et al.  The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation , 2011, Progress in Neurobiology.

[27]  S. Krokstad,et al.  Patterns of receptive and creative cultural activities and their association with perceived health, anxiety, depression and satisfaction with life among adults: the HUNT study, Norway , 2011, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[28]  H. Leder,et al.  Cognitive Fluency: High-Level Processing Dynamics in Art Appreciation , 2010 .

[29]  Stephan Wensveen,et al.  Aesthetic Interaction: A Framework , 2010, Design Issues.

[30]  H. Leder,et al.  Finding meaning in art: Preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  A. Crawley,et al.  Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[32]  P. Silvia Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. , 2009 .

[33]  P. Silvia,et al.  Opposing Art: Rejection as an Action Tendency of Hostile Aesthetic Emotions , 2009 .

[34]  Brian Detweiler-Bedell,et al.  Beauty as an Emotion: The Exhilarating Prospect of Mastering a Challenging World , 2008 .

[35]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience. , 2007 .

[36]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Artistic Training and Interest in Visual Art: Applying the Appraisal Model of Aesthetic Emotions , 2006 .

[37]  T. Jacobsen Bridging the Arts and Sciences: A Framework for the Psychology of Aesthetics , 2006, Leonardo.

[38]  K. Scherer,et al.  What determines a feeling's position in affective space? A case for appraisal , 2006 .

[39]  P. Silvia Emotional Responses to Art: From Collation and Arousal to Cognition and Emotion , 2005 .

[40]  P. Silvia Cognitive Appraisals and Interest in Visual Art: Exploring an Appraisal Theory of Aesthetic Emotions , 2005 .

[41]  M. Barris Vision and Art: The Biology of Seeing , 2005 .

[42]  H. Leder,et al.  A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. , 2004, British journal of psychology.

[43]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[44]  Christof Koch,et al.  Recognizing the gist of a visual scene: possible perceptual and neural mechanisms , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[45]  Michael C. Barris,et al.  Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain. , 2000 .

[46]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience , 1999 .

[47]  Paul J. Locher,et al.  The Contribution of Eye-Movement Research to an Understanding of the Nature of Pictorial Balance Perception: A Review of the Literature , 1996 .

[48]  Gerald C. Cupchik,et al.  Component and relational processing in aesthetics , 1993 .

[49]  D. Freedberg The power of images : studies in the history and theory of response , 1990 .

[50]  C. Martindale,et al.  Relationship of Preference Judgments to Typicality, Novelty, and Mere Exposure , 1988 .

[51]  R. Weale Vision. A Computational Investigation Into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. David Marr , 1983 .

[52]  T. Bever,et al.  The Cognitive Basis of Aesthetic Experience , 1983 .

[53]  Richard J. Colwell Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward An Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation , 1975 .

[54]  D. Berlyne Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, , 1974 .

[55]  S. Kreitler,et al.  THE MODEL OF COGNITIVE ORIENTATION: TOWARDS A THEORY OF HUMAN BEHAVIOUR , 1972 .

[56]  Rudolf Arnheim,et al.  Toward a Psychology of Art , 1967 .

[57]  J. M. Kittross The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[58]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[59]  Gerald C. Cupchik,et al.  The Emotionally Evocative Effects of Paintings , 2016 .

[60]  Juliane Hahn,et al.  Cognition And The Visual Arts , 2016 .

[61]  P. Locher The Aesthetic Experience with Visual Art “At First Glance” , 2015 .

[62]  William J. Doan,et al.  When a Body Meets a Body: An Exploration of the Negative Impact of Social Interactions on Museum Experiences of Art , 2014 .

[63]  B. S. Funch The beauty of life in art , 2013 .

[64]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Neuroaesthetics: A Coming of Age Story , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  Volker Boehme-Neßler,et al.  The Power of Images , 2011 .

[66]  J. Gottfried,et al.  Comprar Neurobiology of sensation and reward (frontiers in neuroscience) | J. Gottfried | 9781420067262 | CRC PRESS , 2011 .

[67]  Fuminori Akiba,et al.  Failure and success in the perception of art , 2009 .

[68]  Ellen Dissanayake THE ARTS AFTER DARWIN: DOES ART HAVE AN ORIGIN AND ADAPTIVE FUNCTION? , 2008 .

[69]  Marcos Nadal,et al.  Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference. , 2008, Spatial vision.

[70]  M. Nadal,et al.  A biological approach to a model of aesthetic experience , 2007 .

[71]  Claudia Mello-Thoms,et al.  Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. , 2007, Spatial vision.

[72]  G. Cupchik,et al.  Layering in art and in aesthetic experience , 2007 .

[73]  A. Baddeley Working Memory, Thought, and Action , 2007 .

[74]  Helmut Leder,et al.  Art expertise: a study of concepts and conceptual spaces , 2006 .

[75]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Positive and Negative Affect: Bridging States and Traits. , 2006 .

[76]  Mariëlle E. H. Creusen,et al.  The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice , 2005 .

[77]  B. S. Funch A psychological theory of the aesthetic experience , 2005 .

[78]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics , 2003 .

[79]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. , 2000 .

[80]  G. Cupchik,et al.  Loneliness as a Theme in Painting. , 1998 .

[81]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  Cognitive interference and the structure of behavior. , 1996 .

[82]  Gerald C. Cupchik,et al.  Emotion in aesthetics: Reactive and reflective models , 1995 .

[83]  P. Locher,et al.  SYMMETRY CATCHES THE EYE , 1987 .